On Jun 11, 6:48*am, "Eric Gisin" wrote:
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p...5570198/spiked


* * * If you write something, as I have done with Chill, which is a rational, critical appraisal of
the whole situation, you would at least expect to have some dialogue. But there has been nothing. I
haven't had a single invitation to speak to any of these groups. Even universities have been
reticent. I have been invited to speak at Leeds University, which has quite a strong climate
community, and the Energy Institute. But the environmental community has been absolutely silent
towards me. I would challenge them to bring all of their experts to the table and hammer it out.

* * * We're seeing the dangerous development here of a very intolerant political ideology. It is a
very strange political and scientific situation, in which vast sums of money are underwriting a
bureaucracy of climate accountants and auditors, and in which academic funding is easier to obtain
if you put man-made climate change at the top of your research proposal. I have never seen anything
like it in the 40 years of my scientific and environmental career.

* * * Peter Taylor was talking to Tim Black.

* * * Peter Taylor is author of Chill: A Reassessment of Global Warming Theory. (Buy this book from
Amazon(UK).)

It was established some time ago that the thing AGW advocates fear
most is conceptual clarity.

"Claudius Denk" wrote in message
...
On Jun 11, 6:48 am, "Eric Gisin" wrote:
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p...5570198/spiked


If you write something, as I have done with Chill, which is a rational,
critical appraisal of
the whole situation, you would at least expect to have some dialogue. But
there has been nothing. I
haven't had a single invitation to speak to any of these groups. Even
universities have been
reticent. I have been invited to speak at Leeds University, which has
quite a strong climate
community, and the Energy Institute. But the environmental community has
been absolutely silent
towards me. I would challenge them to bring all of their experts to the
table and hammer it out.

We're seeing the dangerous development here of a very intolerant political
ideology. It is a
very strange political and scientific situation, in which vast sums of
money are underwriting a
bureaucracy of climate accountants and auditors, and in which academic
funding is easier to obtain
if you put man-made climate change at the top of your research proposal. I
have never seen anything
like it in the 40 years of my scientific and environmental career.

Peter Taylor was talking to Tim Black.

Peter Taylor is author of Chill: A Reassessment of Global Warming Theory.
(Buy this book from
Amazon(UK).)

It was established some time ago that the thing AGW advocates fear
most is conceptual clarity.

------------------
Noisy people fear being ignored.