Newsgroup list corrected.

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:44:34 +0930, Surfer wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:27:54 +1000, "B-O-N-Z-O" wrote:
"Ray Fischer" wrote in message
...
Brian wrote:

Even if it is an eventual problem, global warming is not an immediate
problem.

It is a current problem in Alaska, Siberia, Ukraine, Tonga, Bali,
and ecosystems at high elevations throughout the world.

"We're still _yards_ from driving over the cliff. Let's keep going
100MPH until it's a real problem."

With no evidence of any catastrophic man made climate change so far....

Permafrost melting, which drained nearly 300 lakes and ponds,
which destroyed nearly 300 ecosystems, which forced many species
(including humans) to relocate or die---- all that has already
happened.

Sea walls on coastal regions all along the Pacific Rim islands,
and parts of California, are being raised due to man-
made global warming, and plans are in place to move coastal
infrastructures in-land within a few decades in California, Bali,
Tonga, and much of French Polynesia

Changes have already been catastrophic for the people and other
forms of life so far effected.

The Destruction of New Orleans
http://www.networkideas.org/news/sep...ne_Katrina.htm


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz

On Jun 29, 7:59*am, Desertphile
wrote:

Sea walls on coastal regions all along the Pacific Rim islands,
and parts of California, are being raised due to man-
made global warming,

Wrong.
We saw just how good the levees were built in Southern USA.
No wonder they want to build better defences.
Is this claim of seawalls in the Pacific to replace the claim that the
islanders had to move from their home islands ?
Any rise in the sea level hasn't shown up on the tide guages

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:21:02 -0700 (PDT), George
wrote:

On Jun 29, 7:59*am, Desertphile
wrote:

Sea walls on coastal regions all along the Pacific Rim islands,
and parts of California, are being raised due to man-
made global warming,

Wrong.

LOL! That's right---- just wish the problem away. ROTFL!


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz

On Jun 29, 1:29*pm, Desertphile
wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:21:02 -0700 (PDT), George
wrote:

On Jun 29, 7:59*am, Desertphile
wrote:

Sea walls on coastal regions all along the Pacific Rim islands,
and parts of California, are being raised due to man-
made global warming,
Wrong.

LOL! That's right---- just wish the problem away. ROTFL!

So where are these sealevels rising so fast that sea walls have to be
erected?

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:02:12 -0700 (PDT), George
wrote:

On Jun 29, 1:29*pm, Desertphile
wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:21:02 -0700 (PDT), George
wrote:

On Jun 29, 7:59*am, Desertphile
wrote:

Sea walls on coastal regions all along the Pacific Rim islands,
and parts of California, are being raised due to man-
made global warming,

Wrong.

LOL! That's right---- just wish the problem away. ROTFL!

So where are these sealevels rising so fast that sea walls have to be
erected?

No. Try reading for comprehension. For one example, California has
had to raise the height of retaining walls to protect some of its
coastal highways because the Pacific Ocean is 15.9 centimeters
higher--- there is a six-to-one ratio in ocean surge, which means
not just highway is threatened but also residences. California
also plans on moving some of its infrastructure inland due to
rising ocean height.

Bali is doing the same thing.

You're welcome.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz

On Jun 30, 12:24*am, Desertphile
wrote:

No. Try reading for comprehension. For one example, California has
had to raise the height of retaining walls to protect some of its
coastal highways because the Pacific Ocean is 15.9 centimeters
higher--- there is a six-to-one ratio in ocean surge, which means
not just highway is threatened but also residences. California
also plans on moving some of its infrastructure inland due to
rising ocean height.

Up to where you mentioned ocean surge in the Pacific (largest ocean-
largest storms) your bull**** looked partway convincing.
Erosion is and always has been a real problem especially when people
have been building infrastructure on the coast.
The 'rise' in the ocean levels has occured before as has the 'fall'
Check the benching you see at the coast both above and below the
current ocean levels



Bali is doing the same thing.

Again.
Coastal protection against erosion!
Good idea

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:38:52 -0700 (PDT), George
wrote:

On Jun 30, 12:24*am, Desertphile
wrote:

No. Try reading for comprehension. For one example, California has
had to raise the height of retaining walls to protect some of its
coastal highways because the Pacific Ocean is 15.9 centimeters
higher--- there is a six-to-one ratio in ocean surge, which means
not just highway is threatened but also residences. California
also plans on moving some of its infrastructure inland due to
rising ocean height.

Up to where you mentioned ocean surge in the Pacific (largest ocean-
largest storms) your bull**** looked partway convincing.

You mean the truth is convincing. Well, of course it does.
Meanwhile, California is planning on spending over one hundred
billion dollars just to fight the effrects of global warming over
the next 90 years; they have already spent three billion to combat
the 15.9 cm rise.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz

Desertphile wrote:
You mean the truth is convincing. Well, of course it does.
Meanwhile, California is planning on spending over one hundred
billion dollars just to fight the effrects of global warming over
the next 90 years; they have already spent three billion to combat
the 15.9 cm rise.






Lets see here...

The state is 19 billion in debt, and they are spending money on global
warming ?? Seriously ??

They better not come to the rest of the states to pay for it !

This is ridiculous !

The country is in dire economic straights and they live in a fairy tale
land...


--
AM

On Jun 30, 11:08*am, AM wrote:

Lets see here...

The state is 19 billion in debt, and they are spending money on global
warming ?? Seriously ??

There's an old saying about fools born every minute...

The politicians are what is driving this nonsense...

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:08:39 -0400, AM
wrote:

Desertphile wrote:

You mean the truth is convincing. Well, of course it does.
Meanwhile, California is planning on spending over one hundred
billion dollars just to fight the effrects of global warming over
the next 90 years; they have already spent three billion to combat
the 15.9 cm rise.

Lets see here...

The state is 19 billion in debt, and they are spending money on global
warming ?? Seriously ??

No, California is not spending money on global warming.
California, and many other places throughout the world, is
spending money countering the effects of global warming.

--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz