Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/11/2010 12:58, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 12/11/2010 11:43 PM, Martin Brown wrote: On 12/11/2010 12:14, Sylvia Else wrote: The market determines where the price lies between cost and value, but the price still has to lie between them. If it doesn't then either sellers are losing money on the sales, or purchasers are paying more than they believe the thing is worth. Neither scenario is going to occur in the normal way of things. People sometimes make mistakes, and sometimes things are sold below cost or bought above value for ulterior motives, but in the main stream the price cannot lie outside the limits of cost and value, because people are not that stupid. They are *exactly* that stupid. I take it that you have never heard of any of the "Designer" Brandname products that are priced way beyond their intrinsic value or cost to manufacture. People will pay insane amounts of money for a trendy "Name" on their clothes, perfume etc. What you're saying is that people have different notions from you as to value, and I'm inclined to agree that the values people attach to some products beggars belief. But people people don't pay above the value they perceive. Agreed. They are tricked into perceiving a higher value by clever brand management, coupled with sophsticated advertising and slick marketing. The most recent insanely overpriced "green" thing I saw was a hedgehog home at £50. It must have cost all of £1 in materials and labour to make. Some people have "sucker" stamped prominently on their foreheads. A person may buy a rainwater tank because it makes them feel green (and they like that feeling). If they do that, then that feeling is what makes the value higher for them. At least in the UK small ones are cheap and the rainwater is much better for lime hating plants like my orchids. I also have two plastic dustbins I scavenged for nothing. When I lived in Belgium the house had built in rainwater collection from the roof to bulk underground storage 3x3x2m and also for the greenhouse with a 2x2m open sump 1m deep. Basic reinforced concrete construction with an additive to make it waterproof. Yes it costs money to dig a hole and line it with concrete for water storage but compared to building a desalination plant it is peanuts. Using potable water for watering plants is utter madness. I thought Australia was actually ahead of the game in using recycled grey water irrigation in its gardens - at least in the parts I have visited. But if they're simply trying to obtain their water for the lowest possible expenditure, which is the situation we're discussing, then the value is the lowest price they can get, and desalinators will win over rainwater tanks because it is not possible for rainwater tank makers to offer a price that competes with desalination. Any price that would compete would be below the cost. You can get rainwater tanks in the UK for about 17p/L of storage if you shop around for several hundred litres of capacity. Desalination is a relatively expensive energy intensive process unless you can harness the sun to do it for nothing. How much does your desalinated water cost? Regards, Martin Brown |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oh The Irony! Desal Plant Construction Delayed By Heavy Rain!! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes,Will Cripple Us | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Six Letters That Spell "Insanity" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Emissions Trading Schemes Are Immoral | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Hurricane Insanity... Big Brother has Lost "his" Marbles | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |