Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 23, 6:42Â*pm, Last Post wrote:
Another Top International Scientist Jumps off Global Warming ‘Titanic’ By John O'Sullivan Monday, November 22, 2010 A top East European climatologist, who shared the Nobel Peace Prize with UN global warming colleagues, jumps a sinking ship as ocean data signals a cooler climate. Dr. Lucka Kajfež Bogataj left cold clear water between herself and her former UN shipmates by declaring that rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide probably don’t cause global temperatures to rise. The news scuppers hope for a change in fortune for the beleagured UN climate agency. Their doomed ‘ship,’ the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been sailing on an ill wind ever since it was struck by that Climategate ‘torpedo’ last year. The Slovenian climate professor made the chilling announcement last month in an obscure foreign language journal that has only now been translated into English. The lambast came in the publication Delo Polet (18/11/2010), translated into English as, “Inconvenient Truth.†Inside Bogataj publishes a paper entitled, “The more we know, the better. “ Rises in Levels of Carbon Dioxide follow Rises in Temperatures Buried in an otherwise drab study on paleo - and proxy methods, Dr. Bogataj admitted to what skeptics have long been saying and what the ice core proxy data shows: that rises in atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) are proven to mostly, if not always, occur AFTER rises in temperature. The eminent Slovenian expert is also key climate change adviser to her nation’s president, Danilo Turk. Bogataj’s article, translated into English by her countryman, Miso Alkalaj, makes a startling admission: Â* Â* “A detailed comparison of temperature data and the quantity of carbon dioxide captured in the ice shows, that sometimes it warmed up first and then the concentration of carbon dioxide increased, and sometimes vice versa, but on average the temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.†A startling admission? A statement of the bleeding obvious - it's been known for years that this is what the paleo record shows. After the temperature rises, the oceans warm and release CO2. Nowadays humans release CO2, the oceans don't warm because of their huge heat capacity, the oceans absorb some of that CO2 and acidify. snip References: Dr. Bogataj, K. L., ‘The more we know, the better,’ (18/11/2010), Delo Polet What skulduggery by O'Sullivan - there is no quote from the article to the effect that Ms. Bogataj has taken a contrary position to the world's scientific community on the matter of CO2 causing GW, and my guess is that she did nothing of the sort. I hope she sues him for misrepresentation if this is the case. That's what bottom-feeding ambulance-chasers deserve. John O’Sullivan is a legal analyst and writer who for several years has litigated in government corruption and conspiracy cases in both the US and Britain I see the OP hasn't bothered to list his source. Is it a blog, or what? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Titanic iceberg | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: Therehas been no global warming since 1995 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: Therehas been no global warming since 1995 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
"No man-made global warming says scientist"! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
UN Blowback: 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |