Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Peter Webb
writes If the stream changes course, or ice melt forces it deeper, its effective heat-carrying capacity will change. And that could be a problem for some parts of Europe. Yeah. Cooling apparently. AGW can't lose. If temperatures go up, its due to CO2 increases. If they go down, its due to ocean currents changing as a result of CO2. If they stay the same, its proof that the heating from CO2 is exactly offset by ocean current changes due to CO2. The GLOBAL average temperature is going up, but some parts of the planet will get warmer and some get colder. For example if the Gulf stream stops then the UK will lose the warming that it gets from it. That is a known LOCAL effect, but even if it happens it will not affect GLOBAL temperatures because the warmth that the UK would have got from Gulf stream will simply remain somewhere else e.g. the Caribbean. The current cold weather in the UK is nothing to do with the Gulf stream though, it's to do with the location of the jet stream. This is well understood: http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/featur...ry.aspx?id=146 So where is the warmth that the UK should have got in December 2010? It turns out that it's stuck over Greenland, this was predicted: http://www.sikunews.com/News/Denmark...and,-warm-8208 So let's have a look at how that turned out. From here you can that the average temperature for Godthaab, Greenland in December is between -10c and -5c: http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/world/c...ml?tt=TT000990 Now have a look at the actual min and max Godthaab temperature for the last 4 weeks i.e. end of November, start of December 2010: http://tinyurl.com/3a8u7uj You can see that the average temperature is well above 0c for the period that matches the western Europe's cold snap. Greenland has our usual warmth, neatly matching the prediction. Note that to disprove AGW you have to find observations that disprove real scientific predictions, not fake strawman predictions that you make up yourself. snip -- ICQ #17887309 * Save the net * Grok: http://spam.abuse.net http://www.cauce.org * nuke a spammer * Find: http://www.samspade.org http://www.netdemon.net * today * Kill: http://mail-abuse.com http://au.sorbs.net http://spamhaus.org |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[OT] New Scientist and Climate Change | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Climate Scientist Issues Climate Change Warning | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
U.S. Issues Update on Climate Change Indicators | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
GPS 'thermometer' could flag up climate change - New Scientist | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
NWS issues Hoax Tornado Warning for Los Angeles! | ne.weather.moderated (US North East Weather) |