Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:23:01 -0800 (PST),
David Jonsson , in wrote: I hope weather services reprogram their computers in order to improve weather forecasting. Those 0.19% could be the difference between rain or no rain. Dude, the inaccuracy of our measurements is bigger than that. Here, read: http://www.eol.ucar.edu/instrumentat...specifications Accuracy: pressure .5 mb, temperature .25C, relative humdity 1.5% And that's likely to be state-of-the-art. I don't know how many operational radiosondes are using that sensor package. Frankly, you shouldn't lose too much sleep over 0.19% -- Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either. I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The adiabatic temperature gradient (lapse rate) is temperature dependent | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
The adiabatic temperature gradient (lapse rate) is temperature dependent | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
The adiabatic temperature gradient (lapse rate) is temperature dependent | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
The adiabatic temperature gradient (lapse rate) is temperature dependent | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Adiabatic Lapse Rates | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |