On Feb 25, 10:28*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
What the Ice Cores Tell Us, and How Deniers Distort it

Please see:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c90nab5i-TQ

There's a lot of basic information on ice cores here.

ø Ho! Ho! Ho! that's rich!
Roger the Dodger gets his science from youtube

—*—
ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
No sense
No brains
No nothing at all

Responding to :

On Feb 25, 10:28Â*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
What the Ice Cores Tell Us, and How Deniers Distort it

Please see:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c90nab5i-TQ

There's a lot of basic information on ice cores here.

ø Ho! Ho! Ho! that's rich!
Roger the Dodger gets his science from youtube

—Â*—
ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
No sense
No brains
No nothing at all



So write up your analysis of the provided data.

Show us where it's wrong, and why.

Use as much space as you need.

--
*=( http://www.churchofreality.org/

On Feb 26, 2:34*am, Mike Jones wrote:
Responding to :

On Feb 25, 10:28*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
What the Ice Cores Tell Us, and How Deniers Distort it

Please see:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c90nab5i-TQ

There's a lot of basic information on ice cores here.

ø Ho! Ho! Ho! that's rich!
* *Roger the Dodger gets his science from youtube

—*—
ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
* * * * * No sense
* * * * * * * * No brains
* * * * * * * * * * * No nothing at all

So write up your analysis of the provided data.

Show us where it's wrong, and why.

Use as much space as you need.

--
*=(http://www.churchofreality.org/

Mike, your asking too way much from Leonard, or any denier. Deniers
don't do write-ups, nor do they use data to support logical
explanations.

that's like hunt&peck typing. personally, I hate mice, but
I have to deal with them at public terminals. if you've actually read
a thing that you've linked for us, then you'd say some thing
that seemed particularly important. otherwise, forget it & thank
*you*.

:Scrolling ye god-am palimpsesT:
very true, especially considering erosion, although
skads of tiny island nations are lobbied,
to lobby the UN on this subject, on what they should know, better
than anyone about. (similar to the banning of whaling, a-hem .-)

I am no cynic, no skeptic, no peripatetic etc. ad vomitoirum;
no Denierist, no Believerist; just someone that
you may not know is really not a typing dog -- and may or may not
be.... well,
something of a pythagorean & platonist, I'll cop to it.

as it is there is a huge wall of money in carbon derivatives, and
this was launched with Shrub2's 2003 invasion2 of Iraq -- and
the cut-off of a tenth of our supply of oil, AKA fossilizedFuelTM.
all,
while the climate seems rapidly to be changing, no matter,
the accuracy of the terminology of "global" warming.

Responding to Roger Coppock:

On Feb 26, 2:34Â*am, Mike Jones wrote:
Responding to :

On Feb 25, 10:28Â*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
What the Ice Cores Tell Us, and How Deniers Distort it

Please see:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c90nab5i-TQ

There's a lot of basic information on ice cores here.

ø Ho! Ho! Ho! that's rich!
Â* Â*Roger the Dodger gets his science from youtube

—Â*—
ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* No sense
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* No brains
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* No nothing at all

So write up your analysis of the provided data.

Show us where it's wrong, and why.

Use as much space as you need.

--
*=(http://www.churchofreality.org/

Mike, your asking too way much from Leonard, or any denier. Deniers
don't do write-ups, nor do they use data to support logical
explanations.


I'm not so much "asking a denier" anything, as simply asking /all/ those
who make claims and big fat hairy statements like "This is so!" or "That
isn't so!" to support them with some resource that can be examined, or at
least the basics of their reasons for making their claims.

So far I'm seeing stuff that ranges from the insane to the interesting,
all with related material and explanations (again, not all sane), but
absolutely bugger all from those who spend their time cackling in corners
and high-fiving each other for making a cheap and predictable wise-crack.

IOW, even the "kooks" come out ahead compared to the noise-generators.

--
*=( http://www.churchofreality.org/

On Feb 26, 9:24*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Feb 26, 2:34*am, Mike Jones wrote
On Feb 25, 10:28*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c90nab5i-TQ

There's a lot of basic information on ice cores here.

ø Ho! Ho! Ho! that's rich!
* *Roger the Dodger gets his science from youtube

—*—
ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
* * * * * No sense
* * * * * * * * No brains
* * * * * * * * * * * No nothing at all

So write up your analysis of the provided data.

ø Why should we?? There is nothing
peer reviewed in the picture. Until you come up
with some valid proof with 95% confidence we]
have nothing to discuss

Show us where it's wrong, and why.

ø So far you have provided nothing to discuss.
Oh! We could discuss Rogers' and perhaps
your ignorance but that is boring.

Mike, your asking too way much from Leonard, or any denier. *Deniers
don't do write-ups, nor do they use data to support logical
explanations.

ø HO! HO! HO! That's rich.

—**—
ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
No sense
No brains
No nothing at all

Responding to :

On Feb 26, 9:24Â*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Feb 26, 2:34Â*am, Mike Jones wrote
On Feb 25, 10:28Â*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c90nab5i-TQ

There's a lot of basic information on ice cores here.

ø Ho! Ho! Ho! that's rich!
Â* Â*Roger the Dodger gets his science from youtube

—Â*—
ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* No sense
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* No brains
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* No nothing at all

So write up your analysis of the provided data.

ø Why should we?? There is nothing
peer reviewed in the picture. Until you come up with some valid proof
with 95% confidence we] have nothing to discuss

Show us where it's wrong, and why.

ø So far you have provided nothing to discuss.
Oh! We could discuss Rogers' and perhaps your ignorance but that is
boring.

Mike, your asking too way much from Leonard, or any denier. Â*Deniers
don't do write-ups, nor do they use data to support logical
explanations.

ø HO! HO! HO! That's rich.

—Â*Â*—
ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
No sense
No brains
No nothing at all



Looks like Roger has you pegged Leonard.

--
*=( http://www.churchofreality.org/

On Feb 27, 5:53*am, Mike Jones wrote:
Responding to :



On Feb 26, 9:24*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Feb 26, 2:34*am, Mike Jones wrote
On Feb 25, 10:28*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c90nab5i-TQ

There's a lot of basic information on ice cores here.

ø Ho! Ho! Ho! that's rich!
* *Roger the Dodger gets his science from youtube

—*—
ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
* * * * * No sense
* * * * * * * * No brains
* * * * * * * * * * * No nothing at all

So write up your analysis of the provided data.

ø Why should we?? There is nothing
* *peer reviewed in the picture. Until you come up with some valid proof
* *with 95% confidence we] have nothing to discuss

Show us where it's wrong, and why.

ø So far you have provided nothing to discuss.
* *Oh! We could discuss Rogers' and perhaps your ignorance but that is
* *boring.

Mike, your asking too way much from Leonard, or any denier. *Deniers
don't do write-ups, nor do they use data to support logical
explanations.

ø HO! HO! HO! That's rich.

—**—
*ø Roger the Dodger has lost it.
* * * * * *No sense
* * * * * * * * *No brains
* * * * * * * * * * * *No nothing at all

Looks like Roger has you pegged Leonard.

--
*=(http://www.churchofreality.org/