On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:25:23 -0700 (PDT), matt_sykes
wrote:

On Apr 13, 12:49*am, Desertphile
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:45:48 -0700 (PDT), matt_sykes

wrote:
On Apr 12, 1:39*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS...
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg
Roger, its not 'continued warming'.

Why does =ALL= of the evidence say otherwise?

Warming stopped.

Why does =ALL= of the evidence say otherwise?

Sticking a red line on a scatter plot does not mean its still warming.

Nutter.

Its clear fro the graph that its currently as warm as 1980. *How is
that continued?

Nutter.

It is NOT warming!

Why does =ALL= of the evidence say Earth is still warming?

It DID warm, then it stayed AS warm for 13 years.

No.

I must also note yet again that if global warming were to just
suddenly stop, humanity would be royally ****ed.

There is no RATE OF CHANGE currently, thus it is not WARMING.

Huh? What the ****? If the rate of warming stays the same, Earth
is still warming! Sheeeish.

You really need to work on your definitions of terms.

I refuse to define words to mean what I wish them to: it isn't my
job.

Constant velocity is NOT aceleration. Constant temperature is NOT
warming!

Nutter.