Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter Franks
wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. Here, I've pointed it out so that you can hopefully see the light. Not holding my breath though... http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg Lurkers -- decide for yourself. Does the data really show "continued warming", or is Roger just another GW apologist/propagandist? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/13/2011 5:43 PM, ShyDavid wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg How does it show the earth is still warming? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Peter Franks wrote:
On 4/13/2011 5:43 PM, ShyDavid wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg How does it show the earth is still warming? You can get a reasonably accurate fit of the temperature anomaly since 1979 by fitting a linear plus sinusoidal function to the data. You get a linear trend of 0.14/decade plus a sinusoidal with a cycle of 3.73 years and half amplitude of about 0.13°c. http://tinypic.com/r/10e4iac/7 Right now we are on the downward swing of the sinusoidal but it will return to a maximum in 2013-2014. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 15, 10:20*am, Tom P wrote:
On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Peter Franks wrote: On 4/13/2011 5:43 PM, ShyDavid wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS.... The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg How does it show the earth is still warming? You can get a reasonably accurate fit of the temperature anomaly since 1979 by fitting a linear plus sinusoidal function to the data. You get a linear trend of 0.14/decade plus a sinusoidal with a cycle of 3.73 years and half amplitude of about 0.13 c.http://tinypic.com/r/10e4iac/7 Right now we are on the downward swing of the sinusoidal but it will return to a maximum in 2013-2014.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, thanks John. What we are seeing there is mainly ENSO noise around a warming signal. The troughs, with the most recent, as you say, at present, generally represent the La Ninas. If you look at the temperature trend, joining all the troughs, there is a clear message and it's one which has allowed me to ask a difficult question of the climate deniers as a result. La Ninas are effectively getting warmer. The question is; "why", when other forcings, during previous La Ninas have not been all negative, as they afre at present. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/15/2011 02:03 PM, Dawlish wrote:
On Apr 15, 10:20 am, Tom wrote: On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Peter Franks wrote: On 4/13/2011 5:43 PM, ShyDavid wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS.... The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg How does it show the earth is still warming? You can get a reasonably accurate fit of the temperature anomaly since 1979 by fitting a linear plus sinusoidal function to the data. You get a linear trend of 0.14/decade plus a sinusoidal with a cycle of 3.73 years and half amplitude of about 0.13 c.http://tinypic.com/r/10e4iac/7 Right now we are on the downward swing of the sinusoidal but it will return to a maximum in 2013-2014.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, thanks John. What we are seeing there is mainly ENSO noise around a warming signal. The troughs, with the most recent, as you say, at present, generally represent the La Ninas. If you look at the temperature trend, joining all the troughs, there is a clear message and it's one which has allowed me to ask a difficult question of the climate deniers as a result. La Ninas are effectively getting warmer. The question is; "why", when other forcings, during previous La Ninas have not been all negative, as they afre at present. Here's another fit - http://tinypic.com/r/28qzyp3/7 The periodic function is a sawtooth with a base period of 3.47 years in 1979 which exponentially declines (factor 3 = -0,002) to 3.9 years at 2012. The correlation is 73%. The linear component remains 0.135/decade. The curve fit was implemented in OpenOffice using the Sun Microsystems Solver For Non-linear Programming 0.9. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 15, 8:47*pm, Tom P wrote:
On 04/15/2011 02:03 PM, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 15, 10:20 am, Tom *wrote: On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Peter Franks wrote: On 4/13/2011 5:43 PM, ShyDavid wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS.... The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg How does it show the earth is still warming? You can get a reasonably accurate fit of the temperature anomaly since 1979 by fitting a linear plus sinusoidal function to the data. You get a linear trend of 0.14/decade plus a sinusoidal with a cycle of 3.73 years and half amplitude of about 0.13 c.http://tinypic.com/r/10e4iac/7 Right now we are on the downward swing of the sinusoidal but it will return to a maximum in 2013-2014.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, thanks John. What we are seeing there is mainly ENSO noise around a warming signal. The troughs, with the most recent, as you say, at present, generally represent the La Ninas. If you look at the temperature trend, joining all the troughs, there is a clear message and it's one which has allowed me to ask a difficult question of the climate deniers as a result. La Ninas are effectively getting warmer. The question is; "why", when other forcings, during previous La Ninas have not been all negative, as they afre at present. Here's another fit -http://tinypic.com/r/28qzyp3/7 The periodic function is a sawtooth with a base period of 3.47 years in 1979 which exponentially declines (factor 3 = -0,002) to 3.9 years at 2012. The correlation is 73%. The linear component remains 0.135/decade. The curve fit was implemented in OpenOffice using the Sun Microsystems Solver For Non-linear Programming 0.9.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - yes. it shows the same warming, if you take the troughs of the la Ninas. Same question to deniers. Why do La Ninas cause less cooling now than they did 30 years ago? I'll take answers on Monday. Off to the Big Smoke to watch the marathon. *)) Be good. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/15/2011 12:47 PM, Tom P wrote:
On 04/15/2011 02:03 PM, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 15, 10:20 am, Tom wrote: On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Peter Franks wrote: On 4/13/2011 5:43 PM, ShyDavid wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS.... The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg How does it show the earth is still warming? You can get a reasonably accurate fit of the temperature anomaly since 1979 by fitting a linear plus sinusoidal function to the data. You get a linear trend of 0.14/decade plus a sinusoidal with a cycle of 3.73 years and half amplitude of about 0.13 c.http://tinypic.com/r/10e4iac/7 Right now we are on the downward swing of the sinusoidal but it will return to a maximum in 2013-2014.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, thanks John. What we are seeing there is mainly ENSO noise around a warming signal. The troughs, with the most recent, as you say, at present, generally represent the La Ninas. If you look at the temperature trend, joining all the troughs, there is a clear message and it's one which has allowed me to ask a difficult question of the climate deniers as a result. La Ninas are effectively getting warmer. The question is; "why", when other forcings, during previous La Ninas have not been all negative, as they afre at present. Here's another fit - http://tinypic.com/r/28qzyp3/7 The periodic function is a sawtooth with a base period of 3.47 years in 1979 which exponentially declines (factor 3 = -0,002) to 3.9 years at 2012. The correlation is 73%. The linear component remains 0.135/decade. The curve fit was implemented in OpenOffice using the Sun Microsystems Solver For Non-linear Programming 0.9. Yes, that is fine, it is also a model. Roger's subject/post isn't about the model, it is about the data. It DOESN'T show continued warming. If you want to pal up w/ Roger and have him revise his subject to say "Modeled MSU Data Show Continued Warming", have at it, and you won't hear from me. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/15/2011 11:15 PM, Peter Franks wrote:
On 4/15/2011 12:47 PM, Tom P wrote: On 04/15/2011 02:03 PM, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 15, 10:20 am, Tom wrote: On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Peter Franks wrote: On 4/13/2011 5:43 PM, ShyDavid wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS.... The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg How does it show the earth is still warming? You can get a reasonably accurate fit of the temperature anomaly since 1979 by fitting a linear plus sinusoidal function to the data. You get a linear trend of 0.14/decade plus a sinusoidal with a cycle of 3.73 years and half amplitude of about 0.13 c.http://tinypic.com/r/10e4iac/7 Right now we are on the downward swing of the sinusoidal but it will return to a maximum in 2013-2014.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, thanks John. What we are seeing there is mainly ENSO noise around a warming signal. The troughs, with the most recent, as you say, at present, generally represent the La Ninas. If you look at the temperature trend, joining all the troughs, there is a clear message and it's one which has allowed me to ask a difficult question of the climate deniers as a result. La Ninas are effectively getting warmer. The question is; "why", when other forcings, during previous La Ninas have not been all negative, as they afre at present. Here's another fit - http://tinypic.com/r/28qzyp3/7 The periodic function is a sawtooth with a base period of 3.47 years in 1979 which exponentially declines (factor 3 = -0,002) to 3.9 years at 2012. The correlation is 73%. The linear component remains 0.135/decade. The curve fit was implemented in OpenOffice using the Sun Microsystems Solver For Non-linear Programming 0.9. Yes, that is fine, it is also a model. Roger's subject/post isn't about the model, it is about the data. It DOESN'T show continued warming. If you want to pal up w/ Roger and have him revise his subject to say "Modeled MSU Data Show Continued Warming", have at it, and you won't hear from me. Peter, it's very simple. Tell us why the temperatures have dropped in 2011. And while you're at it, tell us why they - rose in 1979, 1983, 1986, 1990, 1994, 1997, 2001, 2005, and 2009, and why they fell in 1981, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996, 1999, 2003, and 2007. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:03:11 -0700 (PDT), Dawlish
wrote: On Apr 15, 10:20*am, Tom P wrote: On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Peter Franks wrote: On 4/13/2011 5:43 PM, ShyDavid wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS... The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg How does it show the earth is still warming? You can get a reasonably accurate fit of the temperature anomaly since 1979 by fitting a linear plus sinusoidal function to the data. You get a linear trend of 0.14/decade plus a sinusoidal with a cycle of 3.73 years and half amplitude of about 0.13 c.http://tinypic.com/r/10e4iac/7 Right now we are on the downward swing of the sinusoidal but it will return to a maximum in 2013-2014.- Hide quoted text - Yes, thanks John. What we are seeing there is mainly ENSO noise around a warming signal. The troughs, with the most recent, as you say, at present, generally represent the La Ninas. If you look at the temperature trend, joining all the troughs, there is a clear message and it's one which has allowed me to ask a difficult question of the climate deniers as a result. La Ninas are effectively getting warmer. The question is; "why", when other forcings, during previous La Ninas have not been all negative, as they afre at present. That's a great point; but are the El Ninos also getting warmer? -- http://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/15/2011 2:20 AM, Tom P wrote:
On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Peter Franks wrote: On 4/13/2011 5:43 PM, ShyDavid wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:29:28 -0700, Peter wrote: On 4/11/2011 4:39 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University of Alabama at Huntsville. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea. http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg The data do NOT show a continued warming. THEY SHOW INCREASING COOLING, WITH THE MOST RECENT DATA POINTS BEING BELOW NORMAL!!! No. And since your graphs (below) show Earth is still warming, one has got to wonder what the bloody hell you could possibly be lying for. http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/UAH-MSU.jpg http://members.cox.net/peter.franks/RSS-MSU.jpg How does it show the earth is still warming? You can get a reasonably accurate fit of the temperature anomaly since 1979 by fitting a linear plus sinusoidal function to the data. You get a linear trend of 0.14/decade plus a sinusoidal with a cycle of 3.73 years and half amplitude of about 0.13°c. http://tinypic.com/r/10e4iac/7 Right now we are on the downward swing of the sinusoidal but it will return to a maximum in 2013-2014. That's your linear model. The data itself shows something different, and definitely NOT continued warming. It may warm again, in the future, or it may not, but in the meantime, "Latest Satellite MSU Data Show Continued Warming" is patently false. Notice how Roger can't even defend his own post. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Latest Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Latest Satellite Data Show Continued Warming. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Latest Satellite Data Show Continued Warming | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Latest Satellite Data Show Continued Warming. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |