The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed he
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_3.txt
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

On Apr 11, 7:39*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.http://www..remss.com/data/msu/month...onthly_MSU_AMS...
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Why would one need a 500 million billion dollar satellite, to know the
temperature of the Earth, at or near the surface of the Earth?
Wouldn't a 99 cent thermometer do the trick?

More billion dollar lies............................that's why

Chow

On Apr 11, 6:53*pm, GABRIELLE-GIFFORDS-FOR-PRESIDENT
wrote:
On Apr 11, 7:39*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS...
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Why would one need a 500 million billion dollar satellite, to know the
temperature of the Earth, at or near the surface of the Earth?
Wouldn't a 99 cent thermometer do the trick?

More billion dollar lies............................that's why

Chow

YOU ARE A FUKKIN IDIOT

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:53:49 -0700 (PDT),
GABRIELLE-GIFFORDS-FOR-PRESIDENT
wrote:

On Apr 11, 7:39*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed he
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_3.txt
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Why would one need a 500 million billion dollar satellite, to know the
temperature of the Earth, at or near the surface of the Earth?
Wouldn't a 99 cent thermometer do the trick?

All of the missing ice certainly tells us Earth has been warming
at an astonishing rate; but the satellites give us very good
actual numbers. Note also that the satellites doing the
temperature measurements also do many other things.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz

In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005
@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data
are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...hly_MSU_AMSU_C
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious. If ever a headline was designed to fuel public
scepticism about climate hysteria, it's that one. "MSU Data show continued
warming", my arse.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)

On Apr 12, 8:18*am, Falcon wrote:
In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005





@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m...tglhmam_5.4The global data
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...hly_MSU_AMSU_C
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious. If ever a headline was designed to fuel public
scepticism about climate hysteria, it's that one. "MSU Data show continued
warming", my arse.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So spinner says it doesn't...............but the trend shows it
clearly does.

I think spinner has just defined climate denial.

I also love the way that, just *one day* later, spinner uses exactly
the same phrase that was used by someone he both detests and is trying
to hide from, to decry climate science. The phrase, to my knowledge
has not been used for 12 months on here.

Killfile; *my arse*. laughing out loud as he heads out into the
sunshine

On Apr 12, 4:17*am, Dawlish wrote:
On Apr 12, 8:18*am, Falcon wrote:





In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005

@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m...m_5.4Theglobal data
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...hly_MSU_AMSU_C
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious. If ever a headline was designed to fuel public
scepticism about climate hysteria, it's that one. "MSU Data show continued
warming", my arse.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So spinner says it doesn't...............but the trend shows it
clearly does.

I think spinner has just defined climate denial.

I also love the way that, just *one day* later, spinner uses exactly
the same phrase that was used by someone he both detests and is trying
to hide from, to decry climate science. The phrase, to my knowledge
has not been used for 12 months on here.

Killfile; *my arse*. laughing out loud as he heads out into the
sunshine- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dawlish, how is your acne situation.?

On Apr 12, 11:21*am, GABRIELLE-GIFFORDS-FOR-PRESIDENT
wrote:
On Apr 12, 4:17*am, Dawlish wrote:





On Apr 12, 8:18*am, Falcon wrote:

In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005

@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m...4Theglobaldata
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...hly_MSU_AMSU_C
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious. If ever a headline was designed to fuel public
scepticism about climate hysteria, it's that one. "MSU Data show continued
warming", my arse.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So spinner says it doesn't...............but the trend shows it
clearly does.

I think spinner has just defined climate denial.

I also love the way that, just *one day* later, spinner uses exactly
the same phrase that was used by someone he both detests and is trying
to hide from, to decry climate science. The phrase, to my knowledge
has not been used for 12 months on here.

Killfile; *my arse*. laughing out loud as he heads out into the
sunshine- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dawlish, how is your acne situation.?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

O love stalkers. Especially the really foul name-changing racist ones.
When a stalker starts; you know you've got to him properly. This one
is a racist and a creationist and thinks he can comment on science.
he's never criticised by his own - the climate deniers - which says an
awful lot about them, en mass.

Just call him what he is and apart from doinmg that; ignore every
single post he ever makes.................

On Apr 12, 6:21*am, GABRIELLE-GIFFORDS-FOR-PRESIDENT
wrote:
On Apr 12, 4:17*am, Dawlish wrote:



On Apr 12, 8:18*am, Falcon wrote:

In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005

@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m...4Theglobaldata
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...hly_MSU_AMSU_C
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious. If ever a headline was designed to fuel public
scepticism about climate hysteria, it's that one. "MSU Data show continued
warming", my arse.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So spinner says it doesn't...............but the trend shows it
clearly does.

I think spinner has just defined climate denial.

I also love the way that, just *one day* later, spinner uses exactly
the same phrase that was used by someone he both detests and is trying
to hide from, to decry climate science. The phrase, to my knowledge
has not been used for 12 months on here.

Killfile; *my arse*. laughing out loud as he heads out into the
sunshine- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dawlish, how is your acne situation.?

I wonder how his teeth are? One thing I notice about the British....
many of them do not seem to know what a toothbrush is, and avoid
dentists like the plague.
I have British and Scottish ancestry myself....I assume my
ancestor's teeth were pretty bad....what teeth they had.

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:18:02 +0100, Falcon
wrote:

In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005
@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data
are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_3.txt
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious.

Huh?

If ever a headline was designed to fuel public scepticism about
climate hysteria

Huh? What "hysteria?" What the ****?

it's that one. "MSU Data show continued warming", my arse.

You mean Earth hasn't really been warming?

Dude, you have become quite the comical figure here.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz