Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am an amateur astronomer living near the Washington, DC area, but I have a
question about reading weather IR satellite maps. First of all, here is the IR map for my area: http://weather.unisys.com/satellite/...=cur®ion=at Here's my question: The above map shows IR colors corresponding to the highest cloud tops. Obviously, as in the description below the map, and what I've always thought, is that from the light blue color to the yellow would indicate precipitation, and especially thunderstorms in the dark blue to yellow color. However, there have been times when the map was still fully updated (which occurs hourly) that there was a thunderstorm in my area when not even the lightest blue showed up on the map, only the gray. It's caught me by surprise several times in the past. Why is this the case? Other times, I have seen one of the colored areas (other than gray) over my area and we weren't getting any precipitation at all (and yes the map was the latest update). If someone can explain why these anomalies -if it is one- occur, I would greatly appreciate it. Is there another map or website I can use that shows precipitation more accurately? Thanks |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 11:34:23 -0400,
Goldman Candy , in wrote: I am an amateur astronomer living near the Washington, DC area, but I have a question about reading weather IR satellite maps. First of all, here is the IR map for my area: http://weather.unisys.com/satellite/...=cur®ion=at Here's my question: The above map shows IR colors corresponding to the highest cloud tops. Obviously, as in the description below the map, and what I've always thought, is that from the light blue color to the yellow would indicate precipitation, and especially thunderstorms in the dark blue to yellow color. However, there have been times when the map was still fully updated (which occurs hourly) that there was a thunderstorm in my area when not even the lightest blue showed up on the map, only the gray. It's caught me by surprise several times in the past. Why is this the case? Well, there are a couple of possibilities. The classic life cycle of a standard thunderstorm (Byers and Braham, 1948) is on the order of an hour. So a storm could be brewing but not particularly tall and cold during the first satellite image, but then dump its rain on your head and be finished by the second pass comes along and again be neither particularly tall or cold. The thunderstorm is so small that the IR imager can not detect the presence of the thunderstorm. It looks like the resolutions are in the 4 and 8 kilometer categories, and Unisys doesn't say which is being presented. It looks like an 8 KM resolution, not real defined. And an isolated thunderstorm could slip under the radar. See what I did there? ;-) I'd go with the first explanation, as I'm reasonably confident that's what's happening. Other times, I have seen one of the colored areas (other than gray) over my area and we weren't getting any precipitation at all (and yes the map was the latest update). While all thunderstorms have cold cloud tops, not all cold cloud tops are thunderstorms. This is why one should overlay the satellite imagery with the radar imagery - even if you're just doing it in your head. Clouds associated with the jet stream/streaks, for instance are cold, but don't produce rain. But they do have a distinctive shape and are long and fairly thin, along the axis of the jet. If you look at today's (9 August 2011, 18 UTC) GEOS West enhanced IR image, there is a nice little jet streak over southern Arizona/northern Mexico. If someone can explain why these anomalies -if it is one- occur, I would greatly appreciate it. Is there another map or website I can use that shows precipitation more accurately? I'd go with doppler radar: http://radar.srh.noaa.gov/ It has a different set of problems, but those are typically less deceiving. -- Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either. I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
baffling question about reading weather enhanced IR satellite | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
The Most Important Single Question Before Us! — No Question At All | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Baffling question | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
SERIOUS question about CO2 ( Sincere Question. Please Help if you can) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Question about intellicast satellite images | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |