DELUSORY*CONcENSUS* wrote:

http://www.merrittnews.net/article/2...global-warming

Climategate 2.0: time to audit Big Global Warming

December 8, 2011

Using a "nature trick" to "hide the decline" in global temperatures is
anything but objective and honest science.

But those are some of the expressions most remembered from the first
batch of hacked emails revealing the alleged scheming of a climate
research team at East Anglia University in 2009.

The release of these emails


After the first release of emails, the said climate frauds were
'cleared'. But they were less than dishonest and didn't
know about the second set of emails that showed them to be
even more dishonest that the first batch of emails.

These fraudsters could have fessed up to everything but didn't.

Where does that leave all those idiots who cleared them
first time around? They were a bunch of weasels that
couldn't do their job and now has egg on their face.
Could they be trusted to do their jobs again
to make sure Climategate 3.0 doesn't reveal any
new information?

Probably not.

Every time a climate troll writes a letter to
ANY news organisation or academic institution
or IPCC or any affiliates, we need copies of
their official communications to be uploaded
somewhere as part of their employment condition.

Save the world from global warming fraudsters.