"Ray Fischer" wrote in message
...
Marvin the Martian wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:53:22 -0800, Transition Zone wrote:

On Dec 25, 2:42Â am, George152 wrote:

Your lying does little for your 'global warming is the fault of man
cult'

No. AGWFacts doesn't lie. You do.

Got examples or are you using circular logic?

Thousands of researcher in dozens of nations who have compiled a vast
body of evidence.

The sea levels are not rising.

The Jet Propulsion Lab website says they are rising 3mm per year. We
believe them. Not you.

Even if, that doesn't prove warming

Kook.

--
Ray Fischer | None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who
falsely believe they are free.
| Goethe


Oh yes, and namecalling is supposed to discredit the fact that 3mm in sea
level is well within margin of measurment error?

Please...
You are the proof that acolytes of AGW are fanatical cultists.
You pic stupid causes that cannot be proved then
use them to attack your fellow citizens.
That... is the definition of a Whackjob like you.
Your "appeal to authority" is a well established logical fallacy.

You might as well say that all the blind researchers only studing the trunk
of the elephant have compiled a vast body of evidence. Clearly a reference
to the old allegorical Indian story
http://www.jainworld.com/literature/story25.htm. when clearly they do not
have all the relevant facts and they are inserting factors that are not
relevant; including ones they make up to "make" their fallacies appear real.

Funny [odd] that those scientists who do Not agree with YOUR scientists are
refused publication in the Journals of science unless they spend their own
money to publish outside the "official" paths [though a few do get through].
One of the tenets of science is it takes only ONE fact from even a single
individual to destroy a theory; they don't even need to be scientists.
So talking to AGW cultists is akin to shouting to a deaf person. No real
data exchange takes place other than a lot of rude gesticulation as with
Ray-Ray here.

As to hows of the BS;
Most of the students matriculating through the educational system, that can
or do show data to refute "accepted" assertions that are used to manipulate
1st world populations,
are repeatedly ostracized and sabotaged by their thesis teams
in spite of the fact of real observational data analysis, personal biases
the profs & TAs have or the red flag of when a given student shows true
Socratic scientific method of study.
Professorial thesis teams are biased in ways that have nothing to do with a
students ability. Professional educators generally are very very petty; eg.
picking favorites that have demonstrated very bad technical judgement in the
conduct of their lab exercises.
It is rare, possible in 1979, to find a smart Prof who used the Socratic
method wisely.
Sadly they rarely had enough pull to overcome the biased professors who were
the type that were only 1 chapter ahead of the classes they were teaching. A
very poor testament for a tenured professor... but then in the news lately
there are several "professors" that have publicly proved themselves the
flakes that they really are. Think of all the students that have suffered
under them either by abuse, ostracism or by social promotion.
But those outside swallow their 'research' as if it were gospel.
Do that across the world in the global educational monopoly and it is little
wonder what is being spewed out now.

--
"Whatever Crushes Individuality is Despotism, by whatever name it may be
called" - John Stewart Mill


--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ---