Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/26/12 2:18 AM, oriel36 wrote:
The Earth's orbital speed varies and with it the orbital component,as the planet unevenly turns to the Sun effects the total length of the noon cycle... The earth's orbit is elliptical, as a result sunrise, solar noon and sunset get ahead and behind. The eccentricity of the earth orbit and the obliquity of the ecliptic are the largest factors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 2:30*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 1/26/12 2:18 AM, oriel36 wrote: The Earth's orbital speed varies and with it the orbital component,as the planet unevenly turns to the Sun effects the total length of the noon cycle... * *The earth's orbit is elliptical, as a result sunrise, solar noon and * *sunset get ahead and behind. The eccentricity of the earth orbit and * *the obliquity of the ecliptic are the largest factors. * * *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time I guess you live on a hemispherical Earth as below the equator the variations in declination are reversed hence the Equation of Time has nothing whatsoever to do with the height of the Sun,it has to do with the two rotations to the central Sun although I am willing to consider the orbital component as a quasi-rotation insofar as it manifests itself as a trait of the orbital behavior of the planet and easily recognizable in the East to West rotation of Uranus to the central Sun - http://www.daviddarling.info/images/...gs_changes.jpg I have no doubt that these combined motions have already been interpreted correctly as the cause of natural noon variations however it has a greater significance for explaining the difference between seasonal weather patterns within the encompassing structure of global climate but unfortunately readers have to join me in the 21st century by cross referencing planetary systems to arrive at a workable solution. You believe in 1465 rotations in 1461 days and have no business trying to discuss the Equation of Time for there are 1461 natural noon cycles across 4 orbital periods with Feb 29th as the 1461st day/ rotation closing out those 4 orbital circuits so whatever madness is driving you to assume 4 extra rotations that the Earth doesn't have,students should not have to hear it.This is completely unacceptable,the option to deal with the issue is contingent on structures being in place and there is not a single one that I could called organized to handle an issue which surpasses the Gregorian correction by many magnitudes in importance. Do you really want to believe in 1465 rotations in 1461 days ?,I would suffer severe nausea just thinking about what is being forced on students for no good reason other than there is no authority who can sort the issues out and despite astronomy being an individual and very personal endeavor,its insights are not subject to the mishandling by anyone and especially the basic planetary facts. Tell me Sam,the Equatorial circumference is 24901 miles and 15 degrees of geographical separation at the equator is 1037.5 miles and also 1 hour's time difference for each 15 degrees.What is the equatorial speed per hour as the Earth turns through the circle of illumination ?.The very fact that I have to ask that question and you won't answer it is a self inflicted tragedy that you share with everyone else here. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 1:09*am, Davoud wrote:
palsing to oriel: No, not even close. You have been told umpteen times that sidereal rotation and sidereal time have nothing whatsoever to do with the Sun..... You know that he's been told umpteen times (closer to sixty-leben, probably) and /you/ still don't get it? The daily temperature goes up and down on Feb 29th in response to the rotation of the Earth within that final 24 hour period covering 4 years and 4 orbital circuits of the Earth that began Mar1st 2008.If a person manages to count those 1461 days,common sense would dictate that there are a proportion of 1461 rotations to 4 orbital circuits which reduces to a proportion of 365 1/4 rotations to 1 orbital circuit. Any doubts then look at a rotating Earth in a 24 hour period and if you can find room for 1465 rotations in 1461 days then you lack common sense or common decency - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxrIMHKobk0 Appealing to the indoctrinated is not my agenda,if you can find a way to fit 367 rotations of the Earth into the 366 days covering Mar 1st 2011 to Feb 29th 2012 and still account for the daily temperature rises and falls for each 24 hour rotation then good for you. The sensible view is that there are 1461 rotations of the Earth covering 4 circuits of the Earth around the Sun and science doesn't exist if this fact is not affirmed and affirmed aggressively until your cult mentality is no more. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 1:09*am, Davoud wrote:
palsing to oriel: No, not even close. You have been told umpteen times that sidereal rotation and sidereal time have nothing whatsoever to do with the Sun..... You know that he's been told umpteen times (closer to sixty-leben, probably) and /you/ still don't get it? -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm No wonder you keep your website off saa,I had a ball as you denounce the American public on their lack of knowledge that the Earth doesn't turn once in a day - "The lack of even a basic understanding of science among the American people is appalling. Most people can’t answer the most basic questions about the world around them. How long does it take for the Earth to complete one rotation on its axis? (Hint: it’s not 24 hours.) Why do we have seasons? What are the equinoxes? The solstices? (Hint: they're tied to the reason we have seasons.)" Davoud http://www.primordial-light.com/scienceis.html Don't worry about theories,try your own eyes for a change - ww/watch?v=JxrIMHKobk0w.youtube.com On May 29th 2008 when that video was taken,the Earth turned once and the day after that and the next one until in a number of weeks,the Earth will turn the full 1461 rotations in proportion to the separate 4 orbital circuits of the Earth around the Sun.The meteorology guys who watch the temperature go up and down daily normally would concur but so far have shown themselves to be no better or worse than you are. Disappear back into your box where you can discuss the carpet on your observatory floor or something of that nature. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/26/12 12:45 PM, oriel36 wrote:
On Jan 26, 2:30 pm, Sam wrote: On 1/26/12 2:18 AM, oriel36 wrote: The Earth's orbital speed varies and with it the orbital component,as the planet unevenly turns to the Sun effects the total length of the noon cycle... The earth's orbit is elliptical, as a result sunrise, solar noon and sunset get ahead and behind. The eccentricity of the earth orbit and the obliquity of the ecliptic are the largest factors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time I guess you live on a hemispherical Earth as below the equator the variations in declination are reversed hence the Equation of Time has nothing whatsoever to do with the height of the Sun,it has to do with the two rotations to the central Sun although I am willing to consider the orbital component as a quasi-rotation insofar as it manifests itself as a trait of the orbital behavior of the planet and easily recognizable in the East to West rotation of Uranus to the central Sun - http://www.daviddarling.info/images/...gs_changes.jpg I have no doubt that these combined motions have already been interpreted correctly as the cause of natural noon variations however it has a greater significance for explaining the difference between seasonal weather patterns within the encompassing structure of global climate but unfortunately readers have to join me in the 21st century by cross referencing planetary systems to arrive at a workable solution. You believe in 1465 rotations in 1461 days and have no business trying to discuss the Equation of Time for there are 1461 natural noon cycles across 4 orbital periods with Feb 29th as the 1461st day/ rotation closing out those 4 orbital circuits so whatever madness is driving you to assume 4 extra rotations that the Earth doesn't have,students should not have to hear it.This is completely unacceptable,the option to deal with the issue is contingent on structures being in place and there is not a single one that I could called organized to handle an issue which surpasses the Gregorian correction by many magnitudes in importance. Do you really want to believe in 1465 rotations in 1461 days ?,I would suffer severe nausea just thinking about what is being forced on students for no good reason other than there is no authority who can sort the issues out and despite astronomy being an individual and very personal endeavor,its insights are not subject to the mishandling by anyone and especially the basic planetary facts. Tell me Sam,the Equatorial circumference is 24901 miles and 15 degrees of geographical separation at the equator is 1037.5 miles and also 1 hour's time difference for each 15 degrees.What is the equatorial speed per hour as the Earth turns through the circle of illumination ?.The very fact that I have to ask that question and you won't answer it is a self inflicted tragedy that you share with everyone else here. Gerald lives for his nonsensical replies! Apparently no other "pleasures" in his life. The earth's orbit is elliptical, as a result sunrise, solar noon and sunset get ahead and behind. The eccentricity of the earth orbit and the obliquity of the ecliptic are the largest factors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 9:13*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 1/26/12 12:45 PM, oriel36 wrote: On Jan 26, 2:30 pm, Sam *wrote: On 1/26/12 2:18 AM, oriel36 wrote: The Earth's orbital speed varies and with it the orbital component,as the planet unevenly turns to the Sun effects the total length of the noon cycle... * * The earth's orbit is elliptical, as a result sunrise, solar noon and * * sunset get ahead and behind. The eccentricity of the earth orbit and * * the obliquity of the ecliptic are the largest factors. * * *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time I guess you live on a hemispherical Earth as below the equator the variations in declination are reversed hence the Equation of Time has nothing whatsoever to do with the height of the Sun,it has to do with the two rotations to the central Sun although I am willing to consider the orbital component as a quasi-rotation insofar as it manifests itself as a trait of the orbital behavior of the planet and easily recognizable in the East to West rotation of Uranus to the central Sun - http://www.daviddarling.info/images/...gs_changes.jpg I have no doubt that these combined motions have already been interpreted correctly *as the cause of natural noon variations however it has a greater significance for explaining the difference between seasonal weather patterns within the encompassing structure of global climate but unfortunately readers have to join me in the 21st century by cross referencing planetary systems to arrive at a workable solution. You believe in 1465 rotations in 1461 days and have no business trying to discuss the Equation of Time *for there are 1461 natural noon cycles across 4 orbital periods with Feb 29th as the 1461st day/ rotation closing out those 4 orbital circuits so whatever madness is driving you to assume 4 extra rotations that the Earth doesn't have,students should not have to hear it.This is completely unacceptable,the option to deal with the issue is contingent on structures being in place and there is not a single one that I could called organized to handle an issue which surpasses the Gregorian correction by many magnitudes in importance. Do you really want to believe in 1465 rotations in 1461 days ?,I would suffer severe nausea just thinking about what is being forced on students for no good reason other than there is no authority who can sort the issues out and despite astronomy being an individual and very personal endeavor,its insights are not subject to the mishandling by anyone and especially the basic planetary facts. Tell me Sam,the Equatorial circumference is 24901 miles and 15 degrees of geographical separation at the equator is 1037.5 miles and also 1 hour's time difference for each 15 degrees.What is the equatorial speed per hour *as the Earth turns through the circle of illumination ?.The very fact that I have to ask that question and you won't answer it is a self inflicted tragedy that you share with everyone else here. * *Gerald lives for his nonsensical replies! Apparently no other * *"pleasures" in his life. In the worst possible situation of a type the world hasn't seen before, the normal response is simply to begin with the known experiences within a 24 hour period and infer that one 24 hour rotation of the Earth such as daily temperature fluctuations in tandem with day turning to night and keep in step way throughout the 4 orbital circuits of the Earth around the Sun.In short there are 1461 rotations enclosed in the period that began Mar 1st 2008 and will end Feb 29th as the 1461 st rotation. I can't say what this is,it is not betrayal as there is no known reason why anyone,astronomer or not,could imagine 1465 rotations in the 1461 noon cycles in proportion to 4 orbital circuits and yet almost every single day for a decade I have fought to keep this fact front and center until somebody with common sense had the wits about them to understand the consequences.I can talk about fundamental rights of students, the hacket job done on astronomy by empiricists attempting to bridge astronomy with experimental sciences,the sheer mess of the present situation but I cannot account for why people could knowingly suffer something as awful and an imbalance between days and rotations as you have it at 1465 rotations for 1461 days. You have no idea what sacrifices I have made so that no student will ever have to sit before a teacher and be indoctrinated into what is essentially a right ascension cult which tries to justify stellar circumpolar motion without the physical considerations on using an average 24 hour day in the 365/366 day format.By the grace of God I will not fail and this is no revenge talk but that goodness in humanity that none of you can ever extinguish no matter how dominant you appear to be and be that it may that I stand alone with the three known facts which are central to all astronomy,I will not permit a dismal and faith hating bunch to dictate to the wider population and alternative and ridiculous set of values. Here are the 3 core principles that do not take a holiday even if men choose to - 1 - The equatorial Earth turns at a rate of 15 degrees/1037.5 miles per hour and a full 24901 mile circumference in 24 hours 2- The Earth turns 1461 times in 1461 days to the nearest rotation in proportion to 4 orbital circuits of the Sun 3 The are 365 1/4 rotations enclosed on 1 orbital circuit. The refinements haven't even begun yet and there is no entity in existence presently with the motivation to secure those basic facts let alone refine them. You won't argue with those facts,that much I know but they are the foundations on which astronomy is built,either timekeeping or structural/dynamical astronomy.The people in the late 17th and 18th century are not to blame,they made a bad mistake but it is our generation,with all its technology,that cannot support their error nor the people who promote it. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 25, 4:14*am, Science Fan wrote:
What's the name of the phenomenon that causes the sun to continue to rise later, even though the winter solstice has passed? *TIA. I don't know what it's *called*, but as others have said, it is related to the Equation of Time. However, the declination of the Sun is also involved. One interesting way to think about it (at least, I've found it interesting) is to think not about the Sun itself rising and setting, but about the *analemma* rising and setting. The analemma is that elongated figure-eight that we often see on your pricier globes, and it is essentially a parametric plot of the Equation of Time (x-axis) and the declination of the Sun (y-axis). The analemma is aligned along a north-south line, more or less. (It's not exact, but close enough for this discussion.) As such, in the northern hemisphere, where the north celestial pole (NCP) is above the horizon and the south celestial pole (SCP) is below the horizon, the analemma is tilted over to the left when it rises, and over to the right when it sets. For instance, face east, and the NCP is to your left and above the horizon and the SCP is to your right and below the horizon. So, the line connecting them through the horizon is tilted to the left. OK so far? Now let's consider sunrise. Since the analemma is tilted to the left at sunrise, the top of it rises before the bottom does. The top of the analemma represents the summer solstice, and the bottom of it the winter solstice. So, in other words, the Sun rises earlier in summer than it does in winter. Big deal! But actually, it is a bit of a deal. Because the analemma is not a stick, but is a figure-eight with definite width, the latest rising of the analemma does not exactly correspond to its very bottom. If you draw a figure-eight tilted to the left, you'll see that the latest rising corresponds to a point on the lower left of the analemma. The Sun rounds both the upper and lower bowls of the analemma moving to the left, so that's why the latest rising comes *after* the winter solstice. And interestingly, that's true in both hemispheres. What's more, the exact point of the latest sunrise depends on the latitude. The closer to the equator, the more tipped over the analemma at sunrise and sunset, and the more extreme the delay between solstice and latest sunrise. Right at the equator, the time of sunrise doesn't depend at all (directly) on the declination of the Sun, but is a function solely of the Equation of Time. An interesting exercise is to figure out what happens in the Arctic and Antarctic regions. -- Brian Tung (posting from Google Groups) The Astronomy Corner at http://www.astronomycorner.net/ Unofficial C5+ Page at http://www.astronomycorner.net/c5plus/ My PleiadAtlas Page at http://www.astronomycorner.net/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ at http://www.astronomycorner.net/reference/faq.html |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I (Brian Tung) wrote:
One interesting way to think about it (at least, I've found it interesting) is to think not about the Sun itself rising and setting, but about the *analemma* rising and setting. [big ol' snip] I forgot to say: The reason to think of the analemma rising and setting is that the analemma is tied to the *mean Sun*, which advances at a constant rate. That is to say, the analemma as a whole rises exactly every 24 hours. So any day-to-day variation in the rising and setting times of the Sun are due solely to where the Sun happens to be on the analemma. -- Brian Tung (posting from Google Groups) The Astronomy Corner at http://www.astronomycorner.net/ Unofficial C5+ Page at http://www.astronomycorner.net/c5plus/ My PleiadAtlas Page at http://www.astronomycorner.net/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ at http://www.astronomycorner.net/reference/faq.html |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I (Brian Tung) wrote:
The Sun rounds both the upper and lower bowls of the analemma moving to the left, so that's why the latest rising comes *after* the winter solstice. *And interestingly, that's true in both hemispheres. As a post-postscript... After I wrote this, it occurred to me that something interesting happens in the southern hemisphere, as a consequence of the southern bowl of the analemma being wider than the northern bowl. -- Brian Tung (posting from Google Groups) The Astronomy Corner at http://www.astronomycorner.net/ Unofficial C5+ Page at http://www.astronomycorner.net/c5plus/ My PleiadAtlas Page at http://www.astronomycorner.net/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ at http://www.astronomycorner.net/reference/faq.html |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:38:23 -0800 (PST), Brian Tung
wrote: An interesting exercise is to figure out what happens in the Arctic and Antarctic regions. Right at the poles there is no "latest sunrise" etc, instead we have one sunrise and one sunset per year. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sunrise 2 - Gull Lake sunrise-2005.jpg | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
Sunrise 1 - Sunrise on Gull Lake.jpg | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
Volcanic sunrise - Susquehanna sunrise 05-19-11.jpg | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
Sunrise/Sunrise times etc | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Sunrise/Sunrise times etc | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |