On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:27:13 +1100, "AGWFibbery" swin dle@Sswin dle
wrote:


http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01/glo...ict-4-9c-fall/


Quoting from Archbald at the above link

"I showed that Friis-Christensen and Lassen theory could be used as a
predictive tool in 2007. My methodology was copied by Professor
Solheim in an article for a Norwegian astronomical magazine. "

End quote

But the following suggests Friis-Christensen and Lassen theory is
wrong.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/solar-cycle-length.htm



Don't you have any reliable cites?
Leftist/warmist propaganda sites should be strictly avoided!


Well, here is Lassen's 1999 paper that finds that new data
contradicts his earlier hypothesis.

Solar forcing of the Northern hemisphere land
air temperatu New data
P. Thejll and K. Lassen
http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/sr99-9.pdf

Abstract: It has previously been demonstrated that the mean land air
temperature of the Northern hemisphere could adequately be associated
with a long-term variation of solar activity as given by the length of
the approximately 11-year solar cycle. Adding new temperature data for
the 1990’s and expected values for the next sunspot extrema we test
whether the solar cycle length model is still adequate. We find that
the residuals are now inconsistent with the pure solar model. We
conclude that since around 1990 the type of Solar forcing that is
described by the solar cycle length model no longer dominates
the long-term variation of the Northern hemisphere land air
temperature.