"Dawlish" wrote in message
On Feb 14, 7:29 pm, Tunderbar wrote:
On Feb 14, 12:17 pm, "Regnad Kcin" wrote:

"Speedbump" wrote in message

...
On Feb 13, 2:31 pm, Tunderbar wrote:

On Feb 13, 4:04 pm, enigma wrote:

Arctic warms to highest level yet as researchers fear tipping points

Jeremy Hance
mongabay.com

February 13, 2012

http://news.mongabay.com/2012/0213-h...ingpoints.html

oops....

http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/...&fd=10&fy=1979...

It's still there....

Hey ****er it is still winter you jackass. Try looking at this in
september moron

Ok idiot. Just as soon as you explain why that makes a difference and
why a snap shot thirty years apart in February shows little or no ice
loss.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

How many times do you have to make an idiot of yourself over this? A
snapshot of February ice in 2100 will not show an immense amount of
difference to 1979, never mind February 2012. February in the Arctic
is bloody cold. It was in 1979, it is now and it will be at the end of
this century. The sea will be frozen in February 2100, as it is frozen
now. It always been frozen in human history in February and it very
probably probably always will be. The fact that you don't understand
why that happens is a problem of yours; no-one else's.

[There is a logical fallacy to your statements then. If, as you say, "It
always been frozen in human history in February and it very probably
probably always will be", then there is absolutely NO possibility of a
runaway greenhouse effect which is exactly what the start of this AGW BS is
ALL about. Now you are changing that assertion!
The only thing reasonable people can derive from such a bogus argument is
that you are wrong. Plain and simple. Using Occams razor, plain & simple is
the most likely. Like it or not you have less proof and data on your side.
You are trying to predict something that has never happened on Earth
throughout its history and you are supposed to be the demi-god superior
beings that say it is and then say to all of us "You damn well WILL OBEY us
or we will KILL YOU".
Well **** off! Punk!]

September, however, is a very different time of year and there is
*highly likely* to be no ice in the Arctic in September 2100 and there
won't have been for at least 50 years. The reason will have been
global warming and the cause of that will, very probably, have been
anthropomorphic CO2.

[Your "probably" is a surmise that has no basis in fact. The reasons for any
global warming are not yet known other than it is believe to be Solar Cycle
derived. Proof? Simple. Look at the planetary probe data and you see the
same effect on other planets. You can't blame CO2 for that. You are NO KIND
of Scientist.]


--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ---

On 2/15/2012 10:11 AM, Regnad Kcin wrote:

[Your "probably" is a surmise that has no basis in fact. The reasons
for any global warming are not yet known other than it is believe to
be Solar Cycle derived. Proof? Simple. Look at the planetary probe
data and you see the same effect on other planets. You can't blame CO2
for that. You are NO KIND of Scientist.]

Dawlish is a little old funny man in a cardigan and carpet slippers.
Retarded from teaching I'd guess

"George152" wrote in message
On 2/15/2012 10:11 AM, Regnad Kcin wrote:

[Your "probably" is a surmise that has no basis in fact. The reasons
for any global warming are not yet known other than it is believe to
be Solar Cycle derived. Proof? Simple. Look at the planetary probe
data and you see the same effect on other planets. You can't blame CO2
for that. You are NO KIND of Scientist.]

Dawlish is a little old funny man in a cardigan and carpet slippers.
Retarded from teaching I'd guess

hehe... OK. =])

--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ---

On Feb 15, 9:31*am, George152 wrote:
....
Dawlish is a little old funny man in a cardigan and carpet slippers.
Retarded from teaching I'd guess

Guess?

Project much?

--
[Thanking backers of a $16 bn gas project for deciding to go ahead:]
The millions of dollars in state royalties this project will generate
will
help bolster the state's economic recovery after the devastating
floods. At
times like this we need to be able to look to the future with hope and
optimism and the LNG industry will play an important part in our
State's
recovery from this flood crisis.
-- Qld Prem Bligh, 13 Jan 2011