Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/21/12 2:24 PM, Leonard wrote:
There is NO RAPID WARMING and there will be no rapid warming in perhaps 100,000 years. Leonard, I'm sorry that you are not informed about what climatologists are finding. Not only is the earth warming, but it is doing so faster than major warming events in the earth's past history. Sorry, Deniers, Study of True Global Warming Signal Finds Remarkably Steady Rate of Manmade Warming since 1979 http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/1...nmade-warming/ The Last Great Global Warming http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...global-warming Rob Dunbar: The threat of ocean acidification http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evfgbVjb688 Ocean acidification on track to be among the worst of the last 300 million years http://arstechnica.com/science/news/...lion-years.ars IPCC Fourth Assessment Report http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg1.htm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:06:31 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/21/12 2:24 PM, Leonard wrote: There is NO RAPID WARMING and there will be no rapid warming in perhaps 100,000 years. Leonard, I'm sorry that you are not informed about what climatologists are finding. Not only is the earth warming, but it is doing so faster than major warming events in the earth's past history. Isn't Jones one of your favorite Climatologist? "He (Jones) also agreed that there had been two periods which experienced similar warming, from 1910 to 1940 and from 1975 to 1998, but said these could be explained by natural phenomena whereas more recent warming could not. "He further admitted that in the last 15 years there had been no ‘statistically significant’ warming, although he argued this was a blip rather than the long-term trend." Read mo http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...Climategate-U- turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data- organised.html#ixzz1pntbo2Y9 So, the question becomes, why are you lying? You lied about what "Climatologist are finding". You lied about "faster than major warming events in the earth's past history". Or are you claiming Jones a liar? But we know you're right because you have an AIP article that says Galileo was right and he was ridiculed as a denier by the establishment, so the AGW establishment is right to ridicule deniers. You even have Hansen who wants to kill deniers as the Church which burned Bruno. Oh... wait... Not only does that "logic" suck, it's entirely backwards. But, the AIP published it, so it MUST be science, right? HAHAHAHAHA!! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Don't Ask Alarmist "Scientists" Why Trees Are Growing Much Faster | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Alarmist Censors Failed To Stop This Best-Seller | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Time to Retire Alarmist Buzz Words Such As "Denier" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Time to Retire Alarmist Buzz Words Such As "Denier" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Time to Retire Alarmist Buzz Words Such As "Denier" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |