http://www.venganza.org/ (scroll down to the graph)

May be junk, but it still sort of illustrates some of the problems in actually
proving GW.

Adrian

--
Adrian Shaw ais@
Adran Cyfrifiadureg, Prifysgol Cymru, aber.
Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Cymru ac.
http://users.aber.ac.uk/ais uk

In article , (Adrian D. Shaw) writes:

http://www.venganza.org/ (scroll down to the graph)

May be junk, but it still sort of illustrates some of the problems in actually
proving GW.


It illustrates a coincidence, not a "relationship": to do that he would need
to demomstrate the cause-and-effect between the population of Pirates and
atmospheric temperature. Besides which, his Pirate numbers are all wrong,
since they moved into Administration.

People fall for coincidences all the time because they do not understand the
fundamental difference between dependent and independent actions.

Gordon Brown is a Good Chancellor, is an example.



Cheers,


keith








---
Iraq: 6.5 thousand million pounds, 90 UK lives, and counting...
100,000+ civilian casualties, largely of coalition bombing...
London?...

Keith Dancey wrote:
In article , (Adrian D. Shaw) writes:

http://www.venganza.org/ (scroll down to the graph)

May be junk, but it still sort of illustrates some of the problems in actually
proving GW.


It illustrates a coincidence, not a "relationship": to do that he would need
to demomstrate the cause-and-effect between the population of Pirates and
atmospheric temperature. Besides which, his Pirate numbers are all wrong,
since they moved into Administration.

People fall for coincidences all the time because they do not understand the
fundamental difference between dependent and independent actions.

Gordon Brown is a Good Chancellor, is an example.



Cheers,


keith








---
Iraq: 6.5 thousand million pounds, 90 UK lives, and counting...
100,000+ civilian casualties, largely of coalition bombing...
London?...

Keith,

You are missing the point.

You do not need to prove a cause and effect between pirate numbers and
global temperatures. You just need to have faith! Isn't that what
religion and ID is all about.

You obviously haven't, yet, been touched by His Noodly Appendage!

Steve Richards

hehe
wrote in message
oups.com...

Keith Dancey wrote:
In article , (Adrian D. Shaw)
writes:

http://www.venganza.org/ (scroll down to the graph)

May be junk, but it still sort of illustrates some of the problems in
actually
proving GW.


It illustrates a coincidence, not a "relationship": to do that he would
need
to demomstrate the cause-and-effect between the population of Pirates
and
atmospheric temperature. Besides which, his Pirate numbers are all
wrong,
since they moved into Administration.

People fall for coincidences all the time because they do not understand
the
fundamental difference between dependent and independent actions.

Gordon Brown is a Good Chancellor, is an example.



Cheers,


keith








---
Iraq: 6.5 thousand million pounds, 90 UK lives, and counting...
100,000+ civilian casualties, largely of coalition bombing...
London?...

Keith,

You are missing the point.

You do not need to prove a cause and effect between pirate numbers and
global temperatures. You just need to have faith! Isn't that what
religion and ID is all about.

You obviously haven't, yet, been touched by His Noodly Appendage!

Steve Richards

Adrian D. Shaw ha scritto:
http://www.venganza.org/ (scroll down to the graph)

May be junk, but it still sort of illustrates some of the problems in actually
proving GW.

Adrian


It certainly proves that since the 1800s, law and order (and bigger
guns) have virtually eradicated piracy.

While temperature may have increased over the same period, so has the
cost of a postage stamp, thus 'proving' that increased postage cost is
putting pirates out of business.

I am given to understand that GW is a well recognised fact ... it is
(merely) the cause which remains open to debate. Happily the cure is
automatic.

--
Gianna Stefani


www.buchan-meteo.org.uk
www.buchan-nature.org.uk

In article , writes:

Keith Dancey wrote:
In article , (Adrian D. Shaw) writes:

http://www.venganza.org/ (scroll down to the graph)

May be junk, but it still sort of illustrates some of the problems in actually
proving GW.
^^^^^^^




It illustrates a coincidence, not a "relationship": to do that he would need
to demomstrate the cause-and-effect between the population of Pirates and
atmospheric temperature. Besides which, his Pirate numbers are all wrong,
since they moved into Administration.

People fall for coincidences all the time because they do not understand the
fundamental difference between dependent and independent actions.

Gordon Brown is a Good Chancellor, is an example.


Keith,

You are missing the point.

You do not need to prove a cause and effect between pirate numbers and
^^^^^
global temperatures. You just need to have faith!


You have misread the posting. It was about how difficult it was to PROVE GW.

Isn't that what religion and ID is all about.


No. Religion and ID are about deluding yourself.



You obviously haven't, yet, been touched by His Noodly Appendage!


But I have. And I have the stains to prove it.


(Pirate numbers are up)


Cheers,

keith




---
Iraq: 6.5 thousand million pounds, 90 UK lives, and counting...
100,000+ civilian casualties, largely of coalition bombing...
London?...

In article , Gianna writes:
Adrian D. Shaw ha scritto:
http://www.venganza.org/ (scroll down to the graph)

May be junk, but it still sort of illustrates some of the problems in actually
proving GW.


It certainly proves that since the 1800s, law and order (and bigger
guns) have virtually eradicated piracy.


You haven't seen a Microsoft EULA then?


I am given to understand that GW is a well recognised fact ... it is
(merely) the cause which remains open to debate.


Only between the under-informed.


Cheers,

keith



---
Iraq: 6.5 thousand million pounds, 90 UK lives, and counting...
100,000+ civilian casualties, largely of coalition bombing...
London?...

Keith Dancey ha scritto:

You haven't seen a Microsoft EULA then?


Yes, lots, along with licences from many other software vendors. But
none of them were sailing around the Caribbean while brandishing cutlasses.

I am given to understand that GW is a well recognised fact ... it is
(merely) the cause which remains open to debate.


Only between the under-informed.


I am sure the under-informed leading scientific minds of the world
recognise you as a superior authority. Just as I am sure that the rain
outside is falling upwards.


Cin cin
--
Gianna Stefani

www.buchan-meteo.org.uk
www.buchan-nature.org.uk

In article , Gianna writes:
Keith Dancey ha scritto:


I am given to understand that GW is a well recognised fact ... it is
(merely) the cause which remains open to debate.


Only between the under-informed.


I am sure the under-informed leading scientific minds of the world
recognise you as a superior authority.


They take my data. What do you make of that, then?



Just as I am sure that the rain outside is falling upwards.

Just because you are ignorant, does not make everyone so.



No Cheers,

keith



---
Iraq: 6.5 thousand million pounds, 90 UK lives, and counting...
100,000+ civilian casualties, largely of coalition bombing...
London?...