Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Norman Lynagh writes: As I have said a couple of times recently a single probability forecast cannot be judged to be either accurate or inaccurate. Accuracy, or perhaps better described as reliability, can only be judged by evaluating a representative sample of probability forecasts. I would think that a minimum of something like 20 forecasts would be needed. If an event occurred, on average, on 3 occasions out of every 4 in which it was forecast to have a 75 percent probability of occurrence then that probability forecasting would have been spot on. The Met Office forecast of a 2-1 probability of a colder than average winter cannot, on its own, be evaluated as being either accurate or inaccurate. I can't really add anything to that except to say that I agree 100%. -- John Hall "Honest criticism is hard to take, particularly from a relative, a friend, an acquaintance, or a stranger." Franklin P Jones |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Precipitation probability forecasts | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
#5 Probability definition of Reals and AP-adics-- can Earth have rain everywhere simultaneously; Monograph-book: "Foundation of Physics as Atomic theory and Math as Set theory" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Probability forecasts | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Hurrican Charley Shows Progress, Pitfalls in Forecasting | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |