What was the weather like for you in August and September 2004?

AUG. 16 01 24 = wet
AUG. 23 10 12 = wet
AUG. 30 02 22 = x
SEPT. 6 15 11 = x
SEPT. 14 14 29 = x
SEPT. 21 15 54 = wet
SEPT. 28 13 09 = wet

I believe the spells for the phases preceding the Hollister quake went
like this:

An extremely wet spell followed by a wet and windy spell was followed
by a spell which though ostensibly a fine one was very unstable. This
was followed by another unstable spell due to its thundery nature
followed by a spell unstable due to falling between fine and thundery
in the code. This was followed by a wet spell and finally on the day of
the 5.7 on the 28th Sept
http://www.quake.ca.gov/cisn-edc/IQR...4/iqr_dist.htm

All the above were in reference to the weather in the UK of course. I
have no idea what they would have been like in reality.

Weatherlawyer wrote:
What was the weather like for you in August and September 2004?

AUG. 16 01 24 = wet
AUG. 23 10 12 = wet
AUG. 30 02 22 = x
SEPT. 6 15 11 = x
SEPT. 14 14 29 = x
SEPT. 21 15 54 = wet
SEPT. 28 13 09 = wet

....

All the above were in reference to the weather in the UK of course. I
have no idea what they would have been like in reality.


Michael,
The following data may be of interest:
(format = Date - Temp. Min/Max - Pressure at 0900 - Precip. mm - Wind at 0900)

16.8 - 13/19 - 1002f - 0.0 - NE2
23.8 - 12/19 - 1017f - 0.25 - E3
30.8 - 9/16 - 1005r - 1.0 - NE5
06.9 - 11/20 - 1038r - 0.0 - N2
14.9 - 10/14 - 988r - 6.0 - SE3
21.9 - 9/15 - 1002r - 0.25 - W4
28.9 - 10/12 - 1015r - 3.0 - E3

Of those, Sep. 14 could reasonably be described as wet.


--
Gianna

Gianna wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote:
What was the weather like for you in August and September 2004?

AUG. 16 01 24 = wet
AUG. 23 10 12 = wet
AUG. 30 02 22 = x
SEPT. 6 15 11 = x
SEPT. 14 14 29 = x
SEPT. 21 15 54 = wet
SEPT. 28 13 09 = wet

All the above were in reference to the weather in the UK of course. I
have no idea what they would have been like in reality.

Date - Pressure - Precip. mm

16th - 1002f - 0.0
23rd - 1017f - 0.25
30th - 1005r - 1.0
06th - 1038r - 0.0
14th - 988r - 6.0
21st - 1002r - 0.25
28th - 1015r - 3.0

Of those, Sep. 14 could reasonably be described as wet.

Thanks.

That shows up another annoyance concerning statistics. An observer
might be put off by anomalies thrown up by their station. Look how what
should have been a dry spell brought relief to the SE recently. (MAY
5th 05:13. IIRC, it rained through and although there was talk of
hosepipe bans, one water company backed off at the last moment.)

By the way it isn't just the weather for the day of the phase but for
the whole spell ushered in by it, that I was describing as wet or
whatever. Can you remember what the situation was like for the country
as an whole?