Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/5136316.stm
With all the government's heatwave hyperbole and stories of litigation overriding common sense I thought this was vaguely on topic. Joe |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Joe Hunt wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/5136316.stm With all the government's heatwave hyperbole and stories of litigation overriding common sense I thought this was vaguely on topic. Will might not need one, but I got close to wanting one last week. Now you can all laugh, but an insect bite (horsefly or something like - I always get a ridiculous reaction) became infected and my leg below the knee was very swollen. The size is not yet back to normal but improving. But at least, it doesn't hurt any more. But last week my knee was absolute agony and getting up and down stairs seemed to take fully five minutes each time. First cumulus today popped at around 1240 BST with base 6,400 (calculated). Glider pilots yesterday reported remarkable cumulus bases of 8,000. One chap reported a climb from 2,000 to 7,000 feet in a mere 5 minutes - better than a fully laden Jumbo. Jack |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: First cumulus today popped at around 1240 BST with base 6,400 (calculated). Glider pilots yesterday reported remarkable cumulus bases of 8,000. One chap reported a climb from 2,000 to 7,000 feet in a mere 5 minutes - better than a fully laden Jumbo. Jack, do you ever use the LGC at Dunstable? It's at the foot of 'my' hill, now that I've moved. When I'm fully appointed, recording-wise, up here I'll try to interest them in a little AWS down below ... unless, of course, they already have one. Should make for some interesting contrasts. Philip |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
LGC does have a webcam:
http://www.londonglidingclub.co.uk/webcam640x480.jpg home page http://www.londonglidingclub.co.uk/ The club doesn't have a weather station as such, but looking at that picture, you might want to start by trying to sell them a lens cleaning brush! Your contact is the Manager/Chief Flying Instructor Andy Roch Very approachable splendid chap. I have flown from Dunstable in the past but am now retired from active gliding. But I was on Bison Hill Whipsnade a few weeks ago photographing rare butterflies - now I bet you didn't know what was on your doorstep! Jack |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Joe Egginton wrote: That's 12 mph vertical speed Jack, I thought Jumbos were much quicker than that. Though I suppose it's the horizontal speed I'm thinking about. That's correct. 1,000 feet per minute would be good for a fully laden Jumbo on a hot day. A Jumbo just after take off can be extremely heavy and climb very badly indeed, but of course the weight reduces in flight as fuel is consumed. If an engine failure occurs just after take off, the climb is minimal and if two fail after take off - well. "Windsor Castle. Here we come" That's why they have to dump the "disposables" if a problem occurs when heavy - fuel, baggage, toilet contents (you will have heard of those blue-ice meteorites) in that order. Phil will tell us where the approved dumping grounds are. Jack |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Your contact is the Manager/Chief Flying Instructor Andy Roch Very approachable splendid chap. Thanks for the contact I have flown from Dunstable in the past but am now retired from active gliding. But I was on Bison Hill Whipsnade a few weeks ago photographing rare butterflies - now I bet you didn't know what was on your doorstep! That is, literally, on my doorstep! Next time let us know, and you'd be welcome to pop in for a cuppa. Although a wild-life ignoramus, I love the variety of living things to be seen around here, many of which I've never seen before, and most of which are not human. The only problem is the flotilla of airborne nocturnal beasties which head straight for my office light during the evenings. (Can a 'flotilla' be 'airborne', he wonders?) Philip |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Hunt" wrote in message ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/5136316.stm With all the government's heatwave hyperbole and stories of litigation overriding common sense I thought this was vaguely on topic. Joe Big talking point today in Devon media! Personally having moved to an area which is wild and where one can experience nature "in the raw" the thought of such a development leaves me horror-struck. The person proposing it obviously has no idea what winter conditions are like on the Tor summit. 60 mph winds, horizontal heavy driving rain, and icing at times with heavy snow. I would suggest that any moving strucrure is going to need an awful lot of maintenance. A granite path from the car park would also be very slippery in wet weather, there is an easy grass track up there so I don't even see the point in this. Ah well Dartmoor National Park won't allow it that's for sure as all development is very very carefully scrutinised. And what would happen at the top, will it be fenced to stop people falling off, and why stop there why not make all the Tors more bleedin accessible. I'm now too old to learn to climb Mont Blanc summit but do I ask for a stairlift to take me to the top? Of course not. Yes there but for the grace of God go I but if I was infirm the last thing I would want to do would be spoil other people's enjoyment of nature at her naked best just for my benefit. Will (who actually lives in Haytor) -- |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Jul 2006 09:32:28 -0700, wrote:
A Jumbo just after take off can be extremely heavy and climb very badly indeed, ... I don't like Jumbos for that reason they take what seems an eternity to gain flying speed, the runway just can't be that long... Give me a Trilander, only appears to need about 50yds of runway and climbs really quick. If an engine failure occurs just after take off, the climb is minimal and if two fail after take off - well. "Windsor Castle. Here we come" I've been in one with an engine failure just after take off from Heathrow. Overheat light came on and it was pretty noticeable when they shut that engine down. Overheat light stayed on though even with the engine off for 10 mins... Spent a merry hour or so flying up and down the English Channel dumping fuel before returning to Heathrow, chased down the runway by loads of fire tenders and parked up out of the way before being allowed to taxi into a bay. The other reason that jumbos have to dump weight before landing when heavy is because they can't actually land with that weight on board. I suspect that applies to a lot of long haul planes as well. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |