Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those in the south of Britain who woke to steady (and notable) rainfall
this morning might have been surprised to look at the Exeter analysis http://www.weather.org.uk/charts/UKCpf000.png and find no fronts in association with this rain .... however, inspecting the upper air charts, particularly:- http://www2.wetter3.de/Animation_00_UTC/06_1.gif shows the culprit: a broad 'pool' of cold air aloft (slightly 'bluer' colours on this output) and if you follow it through the sequence, the feature actually intensifies. This indicates potential for instability-based vertical motion and if the atmosphere is moist enough (which it obviously is), then thick cloud and rain can result. These things can result in surprisingly significant icing for aircraft operations, which are not what the surface/mslp pattern might indicate. Surface charts don't always show the whole story, particularly with blocked anticyclonic features. Martin. -- FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:40:59 -0000, Martin Rowley wrote in
huge snip of interesting stuff Surface charts don't always show the whole story, particularly with blocked anticyclonic features. It's interesting to look at the 06Z ASXX, as that now has a "trough" pasted into the northerly flow, just to the north of that band of rain. The inclusion of such a feature is often done to illustrate the effects of an upper feature on surface conditions. -- Mike 55.13°N 6.69°W Coleraine posted to uk.sci.weather 28/01/2005 08:58:28 UTC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Rowley" wrote Those in the south of Britain who woke to steady (and notable) rainfall this morning might have been surprised to look at the Exeter analysis Uni Basel hadn't missed the rain. I have become a great fan on account of their reliability: http://pages.unibas.ch/geo/mcr/3d/meteo/index.htm Jack |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Martin, I was indeed wondering just that as I looked at the fairly
heavy rain outside. Another weather mystery solved - only 2,199 to go. Dave "Martin Rowley" wrote in message ... Those in the south of Britain who woke to steady (and notable) rainfall this morning might have been surprised to look at the Exeter analysis http://www.weather.org.uk/charts/UKCpf000.png and find no fronts in association with this rain .... however, inspecting the upper air charts, particularly:- http://www2.wetter3.de/Animation_00_UTC/06_1.gif shows the culprit: a broad 'pool' of cold air aloft (slightly 'bluer' colours on this output) and if you follow it through the sequence, the feature actually intensifies. This indicates potential for instability-based vertical motion and if the atmosphere is moist enough (which it obviously is), then thick cloud and rain can result. These things can result in surprisingly significant icing for aircraft operations, which are not what the surface/mslp pattern might indicate. Surface charts don't always show the whole story, particularly with blocked anticyclonic features. Martin. -- FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The forecasts I heard stressed the drizzle or LIGHT rain expected. Only
'nuisance value' was mentioned which is not too easy to interpret though I took it to be small amounts! 6 miles to East of Bury St. Edmunds I recorded 7.5mm 24hrs to 0900 Z and note that Brooms Barn Research Station (Bury St. Edmunds) reports 9.5mm same period. This would be their most rain for 09 to 09 24hr period since 8 November. It's disappointing that the forecasts (other than Basel?) miss a significant event after such a long dry spell although of course the hind casts well document the reasons for it . NickS, Woolpit. Suffolk. "Martin Rowley" wrote in message ... Those in the south of Britain who woke to steady (and notable) rainfall this morning might have been surprised to look at the Exeter analysis http://www.weather.org.uk/charts/UKCpf000.png and find no fronts in association with this rain .... however, inspecting the upper air charts, particularly:- http://www2.wetter3.de/Animation_00_UTC/06_1.gif shows the culprit: a broad 'pool' of cold air aloft (slightly 'bluer' colours on this output) and if you follow it through the sequence, the feature actually intensifies. This indicates potential for instability-based vertical motion and if the atmosphere is moist enough (which it obviously is), then thick cloud and rain can result. These things can result in surprisingly significant icing for aircraft operations, which are not what the surface/mslp pattern might indicate. Surface charts don't always show the whole story, particularly with blocked anticyclonic features. Martin. -- FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jennikhbm (Suffolk)" wrote in message ... The forecasts I heard stressed the drizzle or LIGHT rain expected. Only 'nuisance value' was mentioned which is not too easy to interpret though I took it to be small amounts! .... indeed, I was screaming at the telly yesterday when the presenter (can't remember who) was waffling about 'not a lot of rain with a high' nonsense; can't comment further 'cos I don't know what they were basing that on, but you can't *ever* relax with a slow-moving high pressure, particularly one parked with it's c-o-g well to the west as this one. Martin. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Rowley" wrote in message ... "Jennikhbm (Suffolk)" wrote in message ... The forecasts I heard stressed the drizzle or LIGHT rain expected. Only 'nuisance value' was mentioned which is not too easy to interpret though I took it to be small amounts! ... indeed, I was screaming at the telly yesterday when the presenter (can't remember who) was waffling about 'not a lot of rain with a high' nonsense; can't comment further 'cos I don't know what they were basing that on, but you can't *ever* relax with a slow-moving high pressure, particularly one parked with it's c-o-g well to the west as this one. Martin. For most of yesterday the nusiance value staement was correct but in the evening there were some very short heavy bursts of rain. Total fore yesterday was 2.5mm most of which fell over a relatively short period. I did wonder what was the reason and it was good to see the explanation this morning. Alan |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Rowley wrote:
snip Surface charts don't always show the whole story, particularly with blocked anticyclonic features. Or even, as in a notable event in the mid-seventies, in an apparently typical boring warm sector. Steady SW wind, 200ft cloud base, 1500M visibility, steady barometer, then 5 minutes later the barometer had fallen 7mb, the cloud was on the deck, visibility 500M, and the wind had increased about 10kts. After another five minutes the pressure was about a millibar shy of where it had been before the fall and everything else was back to normal. Graham |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Gardiner wrote:
snip For most of yesterday the nusiance value staement was correct but in the evening there were some very short heavy bursts of rain. Total fore yesterday was 2.5mm most of which fell over a relatively short period. I did wonder what was the reason and it was good to see the explanation this morning. I heard Luke Harvey on Radio 5 mention this morning that one racecourse had 11mm overnight. Unfortunately, I didn't catch which one it was. Graham |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Gardiner wrote:
For most of yesterday the nusiance value staement was correct but in the evening there were some very short heavy bursts of rain. Total fore yesterday was 2.5mm most of which fell over a relatively short period. I did wonder what was the reason and it was good to see the explanation this morning. Alan Its been utterly gorgeous up here on the West Coast -- enough cloud to keep the frosts away and make the mountains and vistas astonishingly beautiful with shafts of light bouncing off the contours. Enough sun to cheer us all up and make it warm enough to work easily -- we almost have no surface water where it should not be for the first time since last May. It would be wonderful if this could carry on for as long as it likes. If anyone is comtemplating a walking / photographic break around here --- go for it -- its stunning just now -- regards Jill Bowis [Oban] Pure bred utility chickens and ducks Housing; Equipment, Books, Videos, Gifts Herbaceous; Herb and Alpine nursery Holidays in Scotland and Wales http://www.kintaline.co.uk |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stole this from a post on two | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
A hurricane stole my toupet ! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
New Yorkers Stole Our Weather | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
Cold front without rain in Belgium | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Dry cold front in Brussels | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |