Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sunday, 22 October 2006
BRACKNELL (TAWFIELD) 0900 SSW F2 20km -RA 1/SC 8/AS T132D102 RMK: 1Sc~040, 8As~080 (thickened rapidly past 30 mins). PPN began 0845Z. [ OVERNIGHT DATA (18Z - 09Z): screen min: 11.7 grass min: 09.3 precipitation: tr [24hr total: 00.5 mm] other data: Light rain shower early yesterday evening. ]= -- Bracknell (Wooden Hill/Tawfield), Berkshire, UK NGR: SU 854 667 Elev: 80m Lat: 51° 23' 30'' N: Long: 00° 46' 28'' W |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Rowley wrote:
Sunday, 22 October 2006 BRACKNELL (TAWFIELD) 0900 SSW F2 20km -RA 1/SC 8/AS T132D102 RMK: 1Sc~040, 8As~080 (thickened rapidly past 30 mins). PPN began 0845Z. [ OVERNIGHT DATA (18Z - 09Z): screen min: 11.7 grass min: 09.3 precipitation: tr [24hr total: 00.5 mm] other data: Light rain shower early yesterday evening. ]= Martin, I just bought a new Grass Minimum Thermometer from Fairmount Weather Systems which is graduated in 0.5°c increments, however, you can easily make a judgment of 0.1 - 0.2°c intervals. I was wondering how your grass minimum was recorded as 9.3°c? Synops only report to the nearest whole °c. Just curious. Thanks -- Keith (Southend) http://www.southendweather.net e-mail: kreh at southendweather dot net |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith (Southend)" wrote in message
news:ehfd11$dn1$1 Martin, I just bought a new Grass Minimum Thermometer from Fairmount Weather Systems which is graduated in 0.5°c increments, however, you can easily make a judgment of 0.1 - 0.2°c intervals. I was wondering how your grass minimum was recorded as 9.3°c? Synops only report to the nearest whole °c. .... SYNOP's only allow grass minima to be reported to nearest whole degC, but that's simply a function of the code - saving some space: if you remember, *all* temperatures in SYNOP's used to be reported to the nearest whole degC (and before that, the nearest whole degF). With a classic mercury-in-glass thermometer, it is perfectly possible to read to the nearest degC: see the Observer's Handbook, page 111 (1969 ed.). If you haven't got access to that, let me know by email and I'll send you a copy of the relevant page. All the best, Martin. -- FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm and http://booty.org.uk/booty.weather/metindex.htm |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Rowley wrote:
"Keith (Southend)" wrote in message news:ehfd11$dn1$1 Martin, I just bought a new Grass Minimum Thermometer from Fairmount Weather Systems which is graduated in 0.5°c increments, however, you can easily make a judgment of 0.1 - 0.2°c intervals. I was wondering how your grass minimum was recorded as 9.3°c? Synops only report to the nearest whole °c. ... SYNOP's only allow grass minima to be reported to nearest whole degC, but that's simply a function of the code - saving some space: if you remember, *all* temperatures in SYNOP's used to be reported to the nearest whole degC (and before that, the nearest whole degF). With a classic mercury-in-glass thermometer, it is perfectly possible to read to the nearest degC: see the Observer's Handbook, page 111 (1969 ed.). If you haven't got access to that, let me know by email and I'll send you a copy of the relevant page. All the best, Martin. Thanks Martin, I'm not this old, but I have a copy of the Observer's Handbook M.O.191 (1942) and page 25 states: "(a) the range of ggraduation should be suitable, (b) the scale of graduation should be sufficiently open to permit of estimation to 0.1° F. without difficulty. (c) the bulb should be of standard dimensions." I'll e-mail you as I would be interested in whether the (1969) edition has any changes :-) Regards -- Keith (Southend) http://www.southendweather.net e-mail: kreh at southendweather dot net |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sunday, 22 October 2006
BRACKNELL (TAWFIELD) 0900 SSW F2 20km -RA 1/SC 8/AS T132D102 RMK: 1Sc~040, 8As~080 (thickened rapidly past 30 mins). PPN began 0845Z. [ OVERNIGHT DATA (18Z - 09Z): screen min: 11.7 grass min: 09.3 precipitation: tr [24hr total: 00.5 mm] other data: Light rain shower early yesterday evening. ]= 1300 SSE F2 3500 RA 6/ST 8/NS T136D122 RMK: [RE+RA] - 6St~012/014, 8Ns~020. Rain set in at 'steady' mode around 1100Z, with 4.4 mm recorded so far.= -- Bracknell (Wooden Hill/Tawfield), Berkshire, UK NGR: SU 854 667 Elev: 80m Lat: 51° 23' 30'' N: Long: 00° 46' 28'' W |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith (Southend)" wrote in message ... Martin Rowley wrote: "Keith (Southend)" wrote in message news:ehfd11$dn1$1 Martin, I just bought a new Grass Minimum Thermometer from Fairmount Weather Systems which is graduated in 0.5°c increments, however, you can easily make a judgment of 0.1 - 0.2°c intervals. I was wondering how your grass minimum was recorded as 9.3°c? Synops only report to the nearest whole °c. ... SYNOP's only allow grass minima to be reported to nearest whole degC, but that's simply a function of the code - saving some space: if you remember, *all* temperatures in SYNOP's used to be reported to the nearest whole degC (and before that, the nearest whole degF). With a classic mercury-in-glass thermometer, it is perfectly possible to read to the nearest degC: see the Observer's Handbook, page 111 (1969 ed.). If you haven't got access to that, let me know by email and I'll send you a copy of the relevant page. I'm not this old, but I have a copy of the Observer's Handbook M.O.191 (1942) and page 25 states: "(a) the range of ggraduation should be suitable, (b) the scale of graduation should be sufficiently open to permit of estimation to 0.1° F. without difficulty. (c) the bulb should be of standard dimensions." I'll e-mail you as I would be interested in whether the (1969) edition has any changes :-) When I first started observing officially, in the early-1970s, I was bemused by my co-observers' - mostly elderly gentlemen - habit of reporting temperatures ending in .5 or .0 rather more frequently (in one case, much more frequently) than ought to have been the case. I was green enough and brash enough on one night duty to make histograms of each observer's decimal-point count, thinking that I'd identified a form of incompetence or laziness. Now that I need reading-glasses myself for checking thermometers, especially by torchlight at night, I finally understand why. Philip |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Martin Rowley" wrote snip
With a classic mercury-in-glass thermometer, .... just for the record, I should of course have written 'liquid-in-glass' thermometer, especially as the thermometers referred to (grass minimum) use alcohol, not mercury! Martin. -- FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm and http://booty.org.uk/booty.weather/metindex.htm |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Philip Eden wrote:
When I first started observing officially, in the early-1970s, I was bemused by my co-observers' - mostly elderly gentlemen - habit of reporting temperatures ending in .5 or .0 rather more frequently (in one case, much more frequently) than ought to have been the case. I was green enough and brash enough on one night duty to make histograms of each observer's decimal-point count, thinking that I'd identified a form of incompetence or laziness. Now that I need reading-glasses myself for checking thermometers, especially by torchlight at night, I finally understand why. Philip Ah yes, I failed to add, without glasses it would all be pure guesswork :-) -- Keith (Southend) http://www.southendweather.net e-mail: kreh at southendweather dot net |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sunday, 22 October 2006
BRACKNELL (TAWFIELD) 0900 SSW F2 20km -RA 1/SC 8/AS T132D102 RMK: 1Sc~040, 8As~080 (thickened rapidly past 30 mins). PPN began 0845Z. [ OVERNIGHT DATA (18Z - 09Z): screen min: 11.7 grass min: 09.3 precipitation: tr [24hr total: 00.5 mm] other data: Light rain shower early yesterday evening. ]= 1300 SSE F2 3500 RA 6/ST 8/NS T136D122 RMK: [RE+RA] - 6St~012/014, 8Ns~020. Rain set in at 'steady' mode around 1100Z, with 4.4 mm recorded so far.= 1800 SSW F3 8000 -RADZ BR 2/ST 6/SC 8/SC T152D142 RMK: 2St~014, 6Sc~020, 8Sc~040. [ DAYTIME DATA (09Z - 18Z): screen max: 15.2 precipitation: 9.6 other data: moderate, ocnl heavy rain ceased ~16Z, with intermittent light rain/drizzle thereafter. ]= -- Bracknell (Wooden Hill/Tawfield), Berkshire, UK NGR: SU 854 667 Elev: 80m Lat: 51° 23' 30'' N: Long: 00° 46' 28'' W |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[OBS] Bracknell (Tawfield) Sun 29 Oct 2006 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
[OBS] Bracknell (Tawfield) Sun 15 Oct 2006 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
[OBS] Bracknell (Tawfield) Sun 08 OCT 2006 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
[OBS] Bracknell (Tawfield) Mon 02 Oct 2006 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
[OBS] Bracknell (Tawfield) Sun 01 OCT 2006 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |