Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Weatherlawyer" wrote in message oups.com... Alan LeHun wrote: In article . com, says... This is estimated to be 2.3million light years away (13,491,100,800,000,000,000 miles) Damn. I have been cheated all these years. I could have sworn it is: 13,491,100,800,000,000,001 miles.* *Either way, it is easier to see such distances under a clear blue sky when one is standing deep in an hole in the ground. If the hole is a mile deep, it would account for the differences between my estimation and that of Jack's |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 23, 4:46 pm, "Graham Easterling" wrote: Atmospheric refraction bends the rays of light downwards and effectively increases the radius of the earth by about a fifth. Since the horizon distance is inversely proportional to the square root of the earth's radius all the calculated distances should be increased by about 10%. Don't forget that if you see the sun sitting right on the horizon it is actually just entirely below it on a geometrical basis. If the atmosphere were about five times denser you could see right round the earth. One consequence would be that the sun would never set though it may well look a bit dim and sausage-shaped at "night". Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.So this means that, all other things being equal, the horizon distance is greater with high pressure. So if the horizon distance was say 30 miles at 940mb, what would it be at 1040mb? Graham Penzance The figure I gave of one-fifth for the curvature is a little out; it should be one-sixth, nearly, at 1013 mb, 15°C and lapse rate 6.5 deg/km. So a rise of 100 mb (10% of atmospheric pressure) would put the horizon further away by about one sixtieth, half a mile in your case. The lapse rate makes some difference. The larger it is the smaller the curvature of a ray of light and if it exceeds 34.2 deg/km (easily possible close to a heated surface) the ray actually bends upwards, the density *increasing* with height. On the other hand, a strong inversion bends the light more than normal, giving rise to mirages of a different kind. This all gets a bit complicated to explain without diagrams but I hope that's OK. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Most Important Single Question Before Us! — No Question At All | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
SERIOUS question about CO2 ( Sincere Question. Please Help if you can) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Humidity/Comfort Level Question | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Radar Question? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
question regarding Taf location | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |