 |
|
| uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 24th 07, 07:42 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
jo *******i totally wrong
COLD COLD AND COLDER ,WHAT HAPPENED?
|
|
#2
February 24th 07, 08:00 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
jo *******i totally wrong
In article ,
jim beam writes: COLD COLD AND COLDER ,WHAT HAPPENED? If you'd read the other threads before posting, you'd have found out. -- John Hall Weep not for little Leonie Abducted by a French Marquis! Though loss of honour was a wrench Just think how it's improved her French. Harry Graham (1874-1936) |
|
#3
February 25th 07, 06:47 AM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
jo *******i totally wrong
On Feb 24, 8:00 pm, John Hall wrote:
In article , jim beam writes: COLD COLD AND COLDER ,WHAT HAPPENED? If you'd read the other threads before posting, you'd have found out. LOL. |
|
#4
February 25th 07, 01:54 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
jo *******i totally wrong
He`s still wrong ,no matter ,once stated cant go back .
"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 24, 8:00 pm, John Hall wrote: In article , jim beam writes: COLD COLD AND COLDER ,WHAT HAPPENED? If you'd read the other threads before posting, you'd have found out. LOL. |
|
#5
February 26th 07, 07:34 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
jo *******i totally wrong
On Feb 25, 1:54 pm, "jim beam" sputnick wrote:
He`s still wrong ,no matter ,once stated cant go back . And? |
|
#6
February 26th 07, 08:34 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
jo *******i totally wrong
On 25 Feb, 13:54, "jim beam" sputnick wrote:
He`s still wrong ,no matter ,once stated cant go back . Hear, hear! It just goes to show that for the number of times he is right. He is also (often badly) wrong. But he deserves credit for sticking his neck out and trying to see these trends that us lesser mortals cannot detect. |
|
#7
February 27th 07, 05:52 AM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jo *******i is human. (And honest.)
On Feb 26, 8:34 pm, "Scott W" wrote:
On 25 Feb, 13:54, "jim beam" sputnick wrote: He`s still wrong ,no matter ,once stated cant go back . Hear, hear! It just goes to show that for the number of times he is right. He is also (often badly) wrong. But he deserves credit for sticking his neck out and trying to see these trends that us lesser mortals cannot detect. In other words the title is false. (Therefore I have corrected it.) |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Meteorologists: Forced to Choose Between Wrong and Ridiculously Wrong(Solving Tornadoes) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| Jo Bastardi is wrong | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
| Totally Wrong Forecast London | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
| About Last Night, Totally OT | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
| Totally Remote weather stations | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Linear Mode
