On Mar 18, 9:47?pm, Rodney Blackall
wrote:
I was surprised to read in Saturday's Daily Telegraph a pretty devastating
piece by Sam Leith about the making of TGCCS.

The gist of it was that the programme was based on the "Friis-Christensen"
time series. Apparently Armand Leroi had read the literature on this series
which strongly suggested that it was wrong or faked. When questioned the
programme's producer replied with the classic detailed refutation "You're a
big daft cock".

Makes me wonder whether it is worth making the time to watch the recording,
but I suppose I should else I cannot form my own valid opinion.

Why bother forming an opinion? There are plenty of excellent things
you haven't seen or read that could be seen or read instead but you
have put them off too.

Or not, as the case may be.

As for glowballs; either it is a problem or it isn't. Either we can do
something about it or we can't.

One thing is for sure (or two maybe if one counts the fact that god
will probably step in again if things get too bad) there is nothing we
as individuals can do.

Whether or not it is possibe for governments to do something about
it...

Well we all know what use they are at solving problems don't we?

Weatherlawyer wrote:
[...] god will probably step in again if things get too bad [...]

I can only assume that 'god' is your acronym for 'good old david' (cameron?).

I wouldn't put too much faith in him. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.



--
Gianna

http://www.buchan-meteo.org.uk
* * * * * * *

On Mar 18, 10:13�pm, Gianna wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote:
[...] god will probably step in again if things get too bad [...]

I can only assume that 'god' is your acronym for 'good old david' (cameron?).

I wouldn't put too much faith in him. *Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

You are so far off whatever it is you are aiming for with any of your
replies to mine that I wonder if you are sane.

Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Mar 18, 10:13�pm, Gianna wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote:
[...] god will probably step in again if things get too bad [...]
I can only assume that 'god' is your acronym for 'good old david' (cameron?).

I wouldn't put too much faith in him. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

You are so far off whatever it is you are aiming for with any of your
replies to mine that I wonder if you are sane.


Perhaps if you try not making the assumption that I must be aiming at something
if I reply to a post of yours, it would save you concerning yourself about that.

As for sanity, given the attitudes and behaviour of many of the so-called sane,
that is hardly something to which I would wish to aspire. But I do know the
difference.

May your dog be with you.

--
Gianna

http://www.buchan-meteo.org.uk
* * * * * * *

On Mar 20, 9:43�pm, Rodney Blackall
wrote:
In article .com,
* *Weatherlawyer wrote:

As for glowballs; either it is a problem or it isn't. Either we can do
something about it or we can't.

I know it's a bad thing to ask, but here goes anyway. What are these
"glowballs" that may or may not be a problem?

They are a problem aren't they.

I do hope you have a nice holiday by the way. No doubt you are
wondering if the timing of the present spell ties in with the other
things.

May be Or maybe not