Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I saw some of the posts about drought definitions while I
was away. Can I emphasise that the usage of terms such as "Absolute Drought", "Partial Drought" and "Dry Spell" (and the more rarely-used equivalents at the wet end of the spectrum) were discontinued officially in 1961 when emerging computer power allowed a much more flexible approach to rainfall analysis. Those definitions were useful as a sort of book-keeping exercise in the pre-computer era when all climatological analysis was carried out manually by dozens (at least) of clerks at Dunstable/Bracknell as well as by observing staff at outstations.They helped to highlight periods of rainfall shortfall, but their hydrological, water-supply, and agricultural relevance was very limited. It's OK for people to refer to them, or for u.s.w. to resuscitate them if they/we wish, as long as we bear in mind the history and the limited relevance. With that in mind, however, it may be useful to point out that the original threshold for the rainfall amount for breaking an absolute drought was 0.01 inch (which is as near as dammit 2.5mm). As the categories were dropped at a time when rainfall analysis (at least in the publication "British Rainfall") was still carried out in inches, I don't believe the definition was ever formally changed to a metric equivalent: if it had, it would have been more logical and more precise to change it to "more than 0.2mm" rather than "0.2mm or more". (I have a very vague memory of having seen "more than 0.2mm" in print somewhere, but I may just be remembering a long-forgotten rationalisation of my own from 25 years ago or more). Whatever, for anyone wishing to use these categories in the modern era of tipping-bucket rain-gauges, it is advisable to allow recordings of 0.2mm to pass without, as it were, breaking the drought. A tip of 0.2mm is very often the result of an accumulation of several smaller quantities - indeed tipping-bucket tips may be induced by vibration or by thermal expansion/contraction of the rain-gauge housing or by insect life, when one of the buckets is almost full. Relatively rarely is an isolated 0.2mm tip the result of 0.2mm of rain. Philip |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eddies, waves etc: definitions | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Severe drought-Euphrates-- causes massive drought in Iraq,articlelink | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
definitions of climatology | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
dog-gone another drought, only this is a Spring time drought | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Merseyside drought | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |