Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:30:37 +0100, "Bernard Burton"
wrote: No, I mean the ground temperature. The ground surface temperature reacts quickest to the cloud cover, as there is usually a flux of heat from deeper in the ground towards the surface. The ground surface temperature under clear skies will fall rapidly until the heat loss by radiation is balanced by the heat flux from lower in the ground (ignoring latent heat). The whole ground temperature structure and air temperature structure will eventually reach equilibrium in which the sum of all the heat losses is balanced by the gains, provided that the external conditions (eg cloud cover, wind speed, incoming radiation (from sun)), remain constant. What Paul is talking about is the possibility that the temp rises when the clouds come over. If all that happens is cloud cover, with no other effects present, then the mere presence of cloud cover cannot cause the temperature to rise. -- "Perhaps the meek shall inherit the Earth, but they'll do it in very small plots - about 6' by 3'." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 29, 1:36 pm, (Citizen Bob) wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:30:37 +0100, "Bernard Burton" wrote: No, I mean the ground temperature. The ground surface temperature reacts quickest to the cloud cover, as there is usually a flux of heat from deeper in the ground towards the surface. The ground surface temperature under clear skies will fall rapidly until the heat loss by radiation is balanced by the heat flux from lower in the ground (ignoring latent heat). The whole ground temperature structure and air temperature structure will eventually reach equilibrium in which the sum of all the heat losses is balanced by the gains, provided that the external conditions (eg cloud cover, wind speed, incoming radiation (from sun)), remain constant. What Paul is talking about is the possibility that the temp rises when the clouds come over. If all that happens is cloud cover, with no other effects present, then the mere presence of cloud cover cannot cause the temperature to rise. But it does. That is the whole point of this thread. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Apr 2007 05:42:09 -0700, Tudor Hughes wrote:
What Paul is talking about is the possibility that the temp rises when the clouds come over. If all that happens is cloud cover, with no other effects present, then the mere presence of cloud cover cannot cause the temperature to rise. But it does. That is the whole point of this thread. I thought the purpose of this thread was to confirm or deny that such an effect occurs - and explain why. There is nothing presented thus far which does either of those. -- "Perhaps the meek shall inherit the Earth, but they'll do it in very small plots - about 6' by 3'." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:33:20 GMT, Citizen Bob wrote in
Clouds absorb and re-radiate downwards the upwelling long-wave radiation from the surface. When cloud cover replaces clear sky the surface radiation continues, but can no longer escape to space. The air temperature near the surface rises towards the ground temperature until a new balance is achieved. But how can that cause a temperature rise? Soil heat flux, as explained by Bernard, is still happening and in an upward direction. If there was equilibrium *before* the cloud (i.e. upward soil heat flux approx = net outgoing long wave radiation), the arrival of cloud will reduce the loss of energy from the soil, yet the same heat is arriving from below, so the surface warms, until a new equilibrium temperature is reached. -- Mike Tullett - Coleraine 55.13°N 6.69°W posted 29/04/2007 19:50:55 GMT |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.sci.weather on Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Citizen Bob wrote
: Notice that I specifically referred to nights *without* frontal activity, though... How can "clouds come over" if there is not some kind of frontal activity. Well, fog forms without frontal activity... ![]() -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me) |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 29, 1:33 pm, (Citizen Bob) wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:57:06 +0100, "Bernard Burton" wrote: Clouds absorb and re-radiate downwards the upwelling long-wave radiation from the surface. When cloud cover replaces clear sky the surface radiation continues, but can no longer escape to space. The air temperature near the surface rises towards the ground temperature until a new balance is achieved. But how can that cause a temperature rise? -- "Perhaps the meek shall inherit the Earth, but they'll do it in very small plots - about 6' by 3'." -- Robert A. Heinlein There is another source of heat - the air some distance above the ground. On a radiation night this air will be warmer than that in the lowest layers. If there is any turbulence at all there will be some downward flux of heat to the lower layers which are no longer being cooled by contact with the ground. In the case of a flat calm and a strong inversion this particular mechanism would not work, but there would still be heat flux from just below the ground surface. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Apr 2007 15:48:43 -0700, Tudor Hughes wrote:
There is another source of heat - the air some distance above the ground. On a radiation night this air will be warmer than that in the lowest layers. If there is any turbulence at all there will be some downward flux of heat to the lower layers which are no longer being cooled by contact with the ground. In the case of a flat calm and a strong inversion this particular mechanism would not work, but there would still be heat flux from just below the ground surface. Let's try this experiment. Take a tall jar and put it on a warm surface. Cap it with a transparent top. Let it come to equilibrium and measure the temp at the bottom of the jar. Then cover the transparent top with an opaque lid without otherwise doing anything else. Would you expect the temp at the bottom to rise? In the initial condition, the system is open, and in the latter condition it is closed. Does closing an open system cause the temp to rise? I wonder if this simple experiment would yield meaningful results. Put a pot on the stove with water in it. Bring the bottom water up a some few degrees and put a glass top on the pot. Shut off the stove. When the temp at the bottom stabilizes, cover the glass top with an opaque item. Will the temp at the bottom rise? -- "Perhaps the meek shall inherit the Earth, but they'll do it in very small plots - about 6' by 3'." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Divergence of radiative flux? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
A bit warmer in Brussels: partly cloudy with sunshine | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Sunny morning in Brussels and partly cloudy afternoon | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
What's this 6 inch of partly cloudy on my drive? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Brussels cool and partly cloudy | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |