Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only heard a short news item this morning about this. Researchers have
found that the Atlantic was absorbing far less CO2 than it did x years ago. The reporter asked the 'expert' (well, I suppose he was) and he had no idea why this was happening. Seems reasonable to suggest that it will increase further global warming because of the green house effect. I would have thought the simple answer is that if the ocean temperature is warmer it will dissolve/absorb less CO2 so the result isn't too surprising. Anybody know more about this? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com, Pete
L writes Only heard a short news item this morning about this. Researchers have found that the Atlantic was absorbing far less CO2 than it did x years ago. The reporter asked the 'expert' (well, I suppose he was) and he had no idea why this was happening. Seems reasonable to suggest that it will increase further global warming because of the green house effect. I would have thought the simple answer is that if the ocean temperature is warmer it will dissolve/absorb less CO2 so the result isn't too surprising. Anybody know more about this? The absorption of CO2 by the oceans isn't as simple as the equilibrium between dissolved and atmospheric carbon dioxide. The fixation of CO2 by phytoplankton, the formation of calcite and aragonite skeletal elements, and the export of these to deeper waters by gravity, all have an effect. This is why "fertilising" the oceans is one proposed technique of carbon sequestration. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete L wrote:
Only heard a short news item this morning about this. Researchers have found that the Atlantic was absorbing far less CO2 than it did x years ago. The reporter asked the 'expert' (well, I suppose he was) and he had no idea why this was happening. Seems reasonable to suggest that it will increase further global warming because of the green house effect. I would have thought the simple answer is that if the ocean temperature is warmer it will dissolve/absorb less CO2 so the result isn't too surprising. Anybody know more about this? Here's the BBC story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7053903.stm -- Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail "newsman", not "newsboy". "What use is happiness? It can't buy you money." [Chic Murray, 1919-85] |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Oct, 13:03, Pete L wrote:
Only heard a short news item this morning about this. Researchers have found that the Atlantic was absorbing far less CO2 than it did x years ago. The reporter asked the 'expert' (well, I suppose he was) and he had no idea why this was happening. Seems reasonable to suggest that it will increase further global warming because of the green house effect. I would have thought the simple answer is that if the ocean temperature is warmer it will dissolve/absorb less CO2 so the result isn't too surprising. Anybody know more about this? I suspect that this is the paper they were referring to: Brown, P.J., Schuster, U., and Watson, A. J. "Large variations in anthropogenic carbon accumulation in the North Atlantic Subtropics." Submitted to J Geophys. Res. which can be seen on Andrew Watson's (the expert) web pages at http://lgmacweb.env.uea.ac.uk/ajw/Re..._submitted.pdf If you go to the BBC Radio 4 web pages you can listen again to the Today program. There is a short news item at 1 hour 4 mins and an interview with Dr Andrew Watson FRS at 1 hour 20 minutes. I have just heard it myself now. It is typical of the equivocation you get from the "professional scientist." Basically he is saying that it is caused by a warming ocean but that might not be caused by global warming (when it is pretty obvious that it is.) He points out that if it is due to global warming then it will form a positive feedback (which could lead to a runaway.) He seems unable to suggest anyway to reverse it, and seems to think that the only thing to do is keep measuring for another ten years. If it has stopped by then it means it was due to natural causes. If it has not stopped then, then if the runaway has not already happened by then it is highly unlikely that it will be possible to prevent it! Cheers, Alastair. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Snow less than predicted as Atlantic air spreads across the country? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
More Efficiency ,More Benefit, Less Risk, Less Work! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Plants producing less CO2: what does it mean? article link | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
...Soaking Storms Leave Rivers Swollen in California...Oregon...and Washington.... | Latest News | |||
(CNN) Isabel weakens after soaking U.S. coast | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |