uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 11:21 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2006
Posts: 456
Default temperature conversion ignorance

From "The Times" today ref Formula 1

Article 6.5.5 of the FIA's technical regulations states: "No fuel on
board the car may be more than 10C (50F) below ambient temperature".

(Of course the actual 6.5.5 simply leaves it at 10C with no conversion
so FIA are for once in the clear!)

How did these reporters manage to pass the statutory GCSE in science?
Of course, you might blame Google which simply converts 10C to 50F
without any caveats.

Oh dear!

The Times is dreadful for its ridiculous conversions. I have seen
such nonsense as "the height of the waves probably exceeded 10 metres
(32.808399 feet)"

Jack


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 11:57 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,134
Default temperature conversion ignorance

wrote :

From "The Times" today ref Formula 1


Article 6.5.5 of the FIA's technical regulations states: "No fuel on
board the car may be more than 10C (50F) below ambient temperature".

(Of course the actual 6.5.5 simply leaves it at 10C with no conversion
so FIA are for once in the clear!)

How did these reporters manage to pass the statutory GCSE in science?
Of course, you might blame Google which simply converts 10C to 50F
without any caveats.

Oh dear!

The Times is dreadful for its ridiculous conversions. I have seen
such nonsense as "the height of the waves probably exceeded 10 metres
(32.808399 feet)"

The RMetSoc publication house-style uses °C for actual temperatures
and degC for temperature differences and ranges. When I tried to
introduce this to my newspaper columns, they were hastily converted
to C for actual temperatures and °C for ranges by the subs. They
still are.

Philip


  #3   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 01:14 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
JPG JPG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2005
Posts: 291
Default temperature conversion ignorance

On 23 Oct, 11:57, "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote:
wrote :



From "The Times" today ref Formula 1


Article 6.5.5 of the FIA's technical regulations states: "No fuel on
board the car may be more than 10C (50F) below ambient temperature".


(Of course the actual 6.5.5 simply leaves it at 10C with no conversion
so FIA are for once in the clear!)


How did these reporters manage to pass the statutory GCSE in science?
Of course, you might blame Google which simply converts 10C to 50F
without any caveats.


Oh dear!


The Times is dreadful for its ridiculous conversions. I have seen
such nonsense as "the height of the waves probably exceeded 10 metres
(32.808399 feet)"


The RMetSoc publication house-style uses °C for actual temperatures
and degC for temperature differences and ranges. When I tried to
introduce this to my newspaper columns, they were hastily converted
to C for actual temperatures and °C for ranges by the subs. They
still are.


I was told to say degrees Centigrade for actual temperatures and
Centigrade degrees when referring to differences.

Martin


Philip



  #4   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 03:30 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,594
Default temperature conversion ignorance

On 23 Oct, 13:14, JPG wrote:
On 23 Oct, 11:57, "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote:



wrote :


From "The Times" today ref Formula 1


Article 6.5.5 of the FIA's technical regulations states: "No fuel on
board the car may be more than 10C (50F) below ambient temperature".


(Of course the actual 6.5.5 simply leaves it at 10C with no conversion
so FIA are for once in the clear!)


How did these reporters manage to pass the statutory GCSE in science?
Of course, you might blame Google which simply converts 10C to 50F
without any caveats.


Oh dear!


The Times is dreadful for its ridiculous conversions. I have seen
such nonsense as "the height of the waves probably exceeded 10 metres
(32.808399 feet)"


The RMetSoc publication house-style uses °C for actual temperatures
and degC for temperature differences and ranges. When I tried to
introduce this to my newspaper columns, they were hastily converted
to C for actual temperatures and °C for ranges by the subs. They
still are.


I was told to say degrees Centigrade for actual temperatures and
Centigrade degrees when referring to differences.

Martin



Philip


In case any one is as puzzled as me, I think that I have the answer.
A temperature of 10 C is the same as 50 F, but a temperature
difference of 10 C is only 18 F.

Perhaps the offending teams were using American Fahrenheit
thermometers :-)

  #5   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 03:35 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,152
Default temperature conversion ignorance

On Oct 23, 11:21 am, "Jack )"
wrote:
From "The Times" today ref Formula 1


Article 6.5.5 of the FIA's technical regulations states: "No fuel on
board the car may be more than 10C (50F) below ambient temperature".

(Of course the actual 6.5.5 simply leaves it at 10C with no conversion
so FIA are for once in the clear!)

How did these reporters manage to pass the statutory GCSE in science?
Of course, you might blame Google which simply converts 10C to 50F
without any caveats.

Oh dear!

The Times is dreadful for its ridiculous conversions. I have seen
such nonsense as "the height of the waves probably exceeded 10 metres
(32.808399 feet)"

Jack


You're *assuming* they passed GCSE science, of course. :-)
They probably did, but they have not even an elementary feel for
numbers. I've got an O Level in Economics. God knows how, and you
wouldn't come to me for advice on that subject.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.




  #6   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 04:07 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,236
Default temperature conversion ignorance

Alastair wrote:

In case any one is as puzzled as me, I think that I have the answer.
A temperature of 10 C is the same as 50 F, but a temperature
difference of 10 C is only 18 F.


I wasn't puzzled before, but I am now.

Q: How did these reporters manage to pass the statutory GCSE in science?
A: A temperature of 10 C is the same as 50 F, but a temperature
difference of 10 C is only 18 F.

No, I can't make that fit at all.
--
Steve Loft
Sanday, Orkney. 5m ASL. http://sanday.org.uk/weather
Free weather station softwa http://sandaysoft.com/
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 04:16 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2007
Posts: 142
Default temperature conversion ignorance

On 23 Oct, 16:07, Steve Loft wrote:


I wasn't puzzled before, but I am now.

Q: How did these reporters manage to pass the statutory GCSE in science?
A: A temperature of 10 C is the same as 50 F, but a temperature
difference of 10 C is only 18 F.

No, I can't make that fit at all.



Yes you can, because 0 C is 32 F, and 50 F minus 32 F equals 18 F.

  #8   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 04:41 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,236
Default temperature conversion ignorance

wrote:

Yes you can, because 0 C is 32 F, and 50 F minus 32 F equals 18 F.


Yes, yes, even someone without a GCSE in science should be able to work
that one out, but the question was - oh, never mind.
--
Steve Loft
Sanday, Orkney. 5m ASL.
http://sanday.org.uk/weather
Free weather station softwa http://sandaysoft.com/
  #9   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 07, 06:03 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Aug 2003
Posts: 685
Default temperature conversion ignorance

Jack ) wrote:

From "The Times" today ref Formula 1


Article 6.5.5 of the FIA's technical regulations states: "No fuel on
board the car may be more than 10C (50F) below ambient temperature".



That's almost a offensive as when a weather presenter says that temps will
be double or half what they were yesterday.


--
Brian Wakem


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More of the usual pig ignorance from the Worm Last Post sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 January 1st 10 09:04 PM
Blot, Bonzo and that git Happer display their ignorance, again Fran[_2_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 September 25th 09 02:08 PM
GLOBAL GEOLOGY FRAUD & THE UNDERLYING DOGMAS OF SUCH TERRIBLESCHYZOPHRENIA LEADING THE WORLD TO IGNORANCE & PERDITION Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 July 27th 09 06:54 AM
Pure ignorance, I req educating ! [email protected] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 April 1st 08 05:31 PM
Ignorance, you couldn't make this up [email protected] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 November 26th 06 01:28 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017