 |
|
| uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
October 27th 07, 05:41 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
I don't like talking in cliches -so I'll take them of for now.
GFS: Is it fit for purpose?
|
|
#2
October 27th 07, 08:50 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't like talking in cliches -so I'll take them of for now.
"lawrence jenkins" wrote in message ... GFS: Is it fit for purpose? ---------------------- Well I was over the moon about T+360 but now I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell of there being a cold spell, this side of Christmas. Really, you just have to take it one day at a time and stay focused, but I don't think the man in the street should take any notice after T+96. Finally - at least it will be mild. Dave |
|
#3
October 27th 07, 11:44 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't like talking in cliches -so I'll take them of for now.
On Oct 27, 8:50 pm, "Dave Cornwell"
wrote: "lawrence jenkins" wrote in message ... GFS: Is it fit for purpose? ---------------------- Well I was over the moon about T+360 but now I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell of there being a cold spell, this side of Christmas. Really, you just have to take it one day at a time and stay focused, but I don't think the man in the street should take any notice after T+96. Finally - at least it will be mild. Dave Thanks Dave, it was getting kind of lonely for a while |
|
#4
October 28th 07, 03:51 AM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't like talking in cliches -so I'll take them of for now.
On Oct 27, 7:50 pm, "Dave Cornwell"
wrote: "lawrence jenkins" wrote in message ... GFS: Is it fit for purpose? ---------------------- Well I was over the moon about T+360 but now I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell of there being a cold spell, this side of Christmas. Really, you just have to take it one day at a time and stay focused, but I don't think the man in the street should take any notice after T+96. Finally - at least it will be mild. Dave How on earth can you say there'll be no cold spell between now and Christmas, i.e. in the next 2 months. What evidence is there, either way? This is T + 1368 and GFS is little better than a lottery after about T + 120. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. Tudor Hughes. |
|
#5
October 28th 07, 09:38 AM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't like talking in cliches -so I'll take them of for now.
"Tudor Hughes" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 27, 7:50 pm, "Dave Cornwell" wrote: "lawrence jenkins" wrote in message ... GFS: Is it fit for purpose? ---------------------- Well I was over the moon about T+360 but now I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell of there being a cold spell, this side of Christmas. Really, you just have to take it one day at a time and stay focused, but I don't think the man in the street should take any notice after T+96. Finally - at least it will be mild. Dave How on earth can you say there'll be no cold spell between now and Christmas, i.e. in the next 2 months. What evidence is there, either way? This is T + 1368 and GFS is little better than a lottery after about T + 120. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. Tudor Hughes. -------------------------- Irony? Of course you can't! Read the subject heading and see if you can spot the seven cliches therein! Perhaps I should have highlighted them in red ;-) Dave |
|
#6
October 28th 07, 02:13 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't like talking in cliches -so I'll take them of for now.
On Oct 28, 9:38 am, "Dave Cornwell"
wrote: "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 27, 7:50 pm, "Dave Cornwell" wrote: "lawrence jenkins" wrote in message . .. GFS: Is it fit for purpose? ---------------------- Well I was over the moon about T+360 but now I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell of there being a cold spell, this side of Christmas. Really, you just have to take it one day at a time and stay focused, but I don't think the man in the street should take any notice after T+96. Finally - at least it will be mild. Dave How on earth can you say there'll be no cold spell between now and Christmas, i.e. in the next 2 months. What evidence is there, either way? This is T + 1368 and GFS is little better than a lottery after about T + 120. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. Tudor Hughes. -------------------------- Irony? Of course you can't! Read the subject heading and see if you can spot the seven cliches therein! Perhaps I should have highlighted them in red ;-) Dave- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, Dave, but it wasn't *your* heading. The problem is there are (or have been) a number of people on this group who could put up a posting such as yours in deadly seriousness. Clearly I have underestimated you. Oh, dear. :-) Tudor Hughes. |
|
#7
October 28th 07, 04:19 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't like talking in cliches -so I'll take them of for now.
"Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ps.com... On Oct 28, 9:38 am, "Dave Cornwell" wrote: "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 27, 7:50 pm, "Dave Cornwell" wrote: "lawrence jenkins" wrote in message . .. GFS: Is it fit for purpose? ---------------------- Well I was over the moon about T+360 but now I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell of there being a cold spell, this side of Christmas. Really, you just have to take it one day at a time and stay focused, but I don't think the man in the street should take any notice after T+96. Finally - at least it will be mild. Dave How on earth can you say there'll be no cold spell between now and Christmas, i.e. in the next 2 months. What evidence is there, either way? This is T + 1368 and GFS is little better than a lottery after about T + 120. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. Tudor Hughes. -------------------------- Irony? Of course you can't! Read the subject heading and see if you can spot the seven cliches therein! Perhaps I should have highlighted them in red ;-) Dave- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, Dave, but it wasn't *your* heading. The problem is there are (or have been) a number of people on this group who could put up a posting such as yours in deadly seriousness. Clearly I have underestimated you. Oh, dear. :-) Tudor Hughes. ------------------------- Seriously though, I think most of us have reached the conclusion that there is little evidence that any of the forecasts in advance of about four days can be relied upon, but I have to say most of us still look! Dave |
|
#8
October 28th 07, 07:40 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't like talking in cliches -so I'll take them of for now.
On Oct 28, 2:13 pm, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:38 am, "Dave Cornwell" wrote: "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 27, 7:50 pm, "Dave Cornwell" wrote: "lawrence jenkins" wrote in message . .. GFS: Is it fit for purpose? ---------------------- Well I was over the moon about T+360 but now I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell of there being a cold spell, this side of Christmas. Really, you just have to take it one day at a time and stay focused, but I don't think the man in the street should take any notice after T+96. Finally - at least it will be mild. Dave How on earth can you say there'll be no cold spell between now and Christmas, i.e. in the next 2 months. What evidence is there, either way? This is T + 1368 and GFS is little better than a lottery after about T + 120. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. Tudor Hughes. -------------------------- Irony? Of course you can't! Read the subject heading and see if you can spot the seven cliches therein! Perhaps I should have highlighted them in red ;-) Dave- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, Dave, but it wasn't *your* heading. The problem is there are (or have been) a number of people on this group who could put up a posting such as yours in deadly seriousness. Clearly I have underestimated you. Oh, dear. :-) Tudor Hughes.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Tudor- you took your eye of the ball |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| WARNING - If you don't like Red Sunsets DON'T Look ;-) 4 of 4 | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
| WARNING - If you don't like Red Sunsets DON'T Look ;-) 3 of 4 | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
| WARNING - If you don't like Red Sunsets DON'T Look ;-) 2 of 4 | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
| WARNING - If you don't like Red Sunsets DON'T Look ;-) 1 of 4 | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
| Does Bashir Salamati's internet provider at Adelphia Cable Communications REALLY know whom he is ... you can contact them and let them know about his posts ...HE | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Hybrid Mode
