Went to check the m.o outlook charts here;
http://www.meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm and they haven't been updated
and they weren't yesterday either. Anyone know if there's some problem with
them.

Cheers

Dave

Sorry should be the T+108 and 132 charts haven't been updated, looks like
the rest have.

Dave


"David Ledbury" wrote in message
...
Went to check the m.o outlook charts here;
http://www.meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm and they haven't been updated
and they weren't yesterday either. Anyone know if there's some problem
with them.

Cheers

Dave

On 6 Mar, 14:32, "David Ledbury" wrote:
Sorry should be the T+108 and 132 charts haven't been updated, looks like
the rest have.

They are no longer, so I believe. Jon can probably fill you in with
more info.

Richard

"Richard Dixon" wrote in message
...
On 6 Mar, 14:32, "David Ledbury" wrote:
Sorry should be the T+108 and 132 charts haven't been updated,
looks like
the rest have.


.... the withdrawal of these charts has been on the stocks for some
time - at least three years.

I'm somewhat surprised that an explanatory note wasn't added to the
final charts.

Martin.

--
Martin Rowley
E:
W: booty.org.uk

On 6 Mar, 17:43, "Martin Rowley"
wrote:

... the withdrawal of these charts has been on the stocks for some
time - at least three years.

But why? If confirmed it's a huge loss and not just to we users. UK
MetOffice is in for some very bad publicity I reckon.

Jack

"Richard Dixon" wrote in message
...
On 6 Mar, 14:32, "David Ledbury" wrote:
Sorry should be the T+108 and 132 charts haven't been updated, looks
like
the rest have.

They are no longer, so I believe. Jon can probably fill you in with
more info.

Richard

Production of the T+108 and 132 did indeed cease with effect from Tuesday.

Suggest for further information.

Jon.

Shame that they've gone. Was part of the lunchtime scan and sometimes eagly
looked forward to..

Phil

On 6 Mar, 20:20, "Jack )"
wrote:
On 6 Mar, 17:43, "Martin Rowley"

wrote:
... the withdrawal of these charts has been on the stocks for some
time - at least three years.

But why? *If confirmed it's a huge loss and not just to we users. *UK
MetOffice is in for some very bad publicity I reckon.

Jack

Nothing surprises me about MetO decisions.

Still, there's always Magic Seaweed http://magicseaweed.com/UK-Ireland-M...1/pressure/in/

or http://magicseaweed.com/UK-Ireland-M...ts/1/swell/in/

Graham
Penzance

On 6 Mar, 21:34, Graham Easterling wrote:
On 6 Mar, 20:20, "Jack )"

wrote:
On 6 Mar, 17:43, "Martin Rowley"

wrote:
... the withdrawal of these charts has been on the stocks for some
time - at least three years.

But why? *If confirmed it's a huge loss and not just to we users. *UK
MetOffice is in for some very bad publicity I reckon.

Jack

Nothing surprises me about MetO decisions.

Still, there's always Magic Seaweedhttp://magicseaweed.com/UK-Ireland-MSW-Surf-Charts/1/pressure/in/

orhttp://magicseaweed.com/UK-Ireland-MSW-Surf-Charts/1/swell/in/

Graham
Penzance

Actually, magic seaweed have downgraded Monday's swell forecast
slightly from earlier today.

Hadn't heard of Magic Seaweed, will use that in future if the Met's gone
belly up.

Cheers

Dave


"Graham Easterling" wrote in message
...
On 6 Mar, 20:20, "Jack )"
wrote:
On 6 Mar, 17:43, "Martin Rowley"

wrote:
... the withdrawal of these charts has been on the stocks for some
time - at least three years.

But why? If confirmed it's a huge loss and not just to we users. UK
MetOffice is in for some very bad publicity I reckon.

Jack

Nothing surprises me about MetO decisions.

Still, there's always Magic Seaweed
http://magicseaweed.com/UK-Ireland-M...1/pressure/in/

or http://magicseaweed.com/UK-Ireland-M...ts/1/swell/in/

Graham
Penzance