Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/7299561.stm
Experts have called for "immediate action" to reverse the trend, which is seen as a key climate change indicator. If it was to happen it's all to little to late. -- Keith (Southend) http://www.southendweather.net e-mail: kreh at southendweather dot net |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Sir
It is too and too, not to and to. However ,during my geology Phd in 1975, we were measuring the very same glaciers ,and found the terminal moranic positions exceptionally varied over 5000yrs, Infact glacial terminal positions had receeded 8 times to a more receeded position than at present.(no human co2 then.) Jim "Keith (Southend)" wrote in message ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/7299561.stm Experts have called for "immediate action" to reverse the trend, which is seen as a key climate change indicator. If it was to happen it's all to little to late. -- Keith (Southend) http://www.southendweather.net e-mail: kreh at southendweather dot net |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith (Southend) wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/7299561.stm Experts have called for ***"immediate action" to reverse the trend****, How can humanity stop glaciers from melting? Perhaps build a giant dam at the end of the glacier, and blow very cold air onto it ! which is seen as a key climate change indicator. If it was to happen it's all to little to late. -- Joe Egginton Wolverhampton 175m asl |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Mar, 01:07, Joe Egginton wrote:
Experts have called for ***"immediate action" to reverse the trend****, How can humanity stop glaciers from melting? *Perhaps build a giant dam at the end of the glacier, and blow very cold air onto it ! And then use the glaciers to cool the atmosphere that's been heated up by the CO2 that's been emitted by the generators that produced the cool air that cooled the glaciers ........... No, there are lots more alternatives: 1. Put a giant venetian blind in space to block off a small percentage of the sun's output - 1% should do it - bags I holding onto the chord, though! 2. Temporarily slow down the earth's orbit during the night(!) to make the cooling nights longer and the hot days shorter, 3. Move the earth into a higher orbit (some politicians and pundits are already there), further away from the sun - give me a decent sized lever and I'd be happy to give it a go. 4. Twice a year, at the equinox, park the earth for a few days to allow both hemispheres a bit of a chance to take a breather and cool down 5. Syphon some of the oceans off onto the moon, 6. If that's too ambitious, maybe drill a large plughole through the Pacific into the eath's core and drain off some of the water that way, 7. Make smoking compulsory for everyone so that the increased opacity of the atmosphere will reflect more of the sun's heat (or does that absorb it?) 8. Encourage everyone to drink more fizzy drinks, using atmospheric CO2 during manufacture 9. Grow larger bones 10. Construct huge Limewater fountains to absorb excess atmospheric CO2 11. Take one less breath in every 20 12. Metabolise less by sleeping 50% more 13. Move more slowly, speak less often, do less work - and stop politicians and career "environmentalists" producing so much hot air, in favour of actually doing something constructive. Regards, - Tom. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() * However ,during my geology Phd in 1975, we were measuring the very same glaciers ,and found the terminal moranic positions exceptionally varied over 5000yrs, Infact glacial terminal positions had receeded 8 times to a more receeded position than at present.(no human co2 then.) * Jim I'm not clear how you could have studied a terminal morraine in a more receeded position than at present, as by it's very definition, it would currently be under rather a large chunk of ice. Even if it hadn't been damaged by the subsequent spread of the glacier, and you were able to identify it under the ice, I'd still be interest to know how you dated the deposit. As glaciers are systems which do not all move in synch (some, after all are currently expanding) it is the general trend which is more important than the movement of any particular glacier in any case. You can always find a glacier which is bucking the trend. (Hope my English is OK) Graham (I've also studied terminal morraines) Penzance |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
do you suffer from wind ? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Walruses Suffer Substantial Losses as Sea Ice Erodes | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Day ??G*10^3 - The Sun hibernates - Charities suffer from global financial crisis | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Greens Don't All Suffer from Self-Hate, Tunderbar - Some of ThemJust Hate YOU | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
New England may suffer rolling blackouts due to freeze | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |