"Nick Gardner" wrote in message
...
Paul

The ECM output of 00Z 3rd June shows a wobble for next week. Is it all
going
to fall apart........oh no!
________________
Nick.
Otter Valley, Devon
83 m amsl
http://www.ottervalley.co.uk

Even more a wobble with EC's 12Z operational run which has a very unsettled
look to it. The ensemble signal appeared mixed with any cyclonic
developments seemingly dependant on the handling of a trough disruption to
the west on Monday. Appears it could go either way at this stage.

Jon.

On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:36:29 -0000, "Jim Smith"
wrote:



I'm getting married on July 5th and off to Guernsey afterwards on honeymoon,
so I am desperate for a non-repeat of last year, or another 1988/98!!
Fingers crossed.....

And I am due to get married on July 20th at Bedford, within 25 metres
of the River. Not concerned about floods in the slightest as the area
seems to have considerable flood defences! Honeymoon - Rome in the
autumn
R

Dawlish wrote:

Nah. I'd never wish to filter anyone out. I've always got the choice
as to whether to reply to people who are talking out of their bum, or
completely ignore them because they are talking out of their bum - and
I'm getting much better at the latter! I don't quite see why you
changed the thread title again, Jim.

Jim didn't change the subject; the sequence is unbroken from Michael's
original change.

--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman, not newsboy.

On Jun 4, 10:33*am, Graham P Davis wrote:
Dawlish wrote:
Nah. I'd never wish to filter anyone out. I've always got the choice
as to whether to reply to people who are talking out of their bum, or
completely ignore them because they are talking out of their bum - and
I'm getting much better at the latter! I don't quite see why you
changed the thread title again, Jim.

Jim didn't change the subject; the sequence is unbroken from Michael's
original change.

--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. * *E-mail: newsman, not newsboy..

Heh! Maybe you see it differently! Your own post changed it again!

"Discussion subject changed to "The Dawlish book of quotes thread." by
Graham P Davis" - quote from what sits above your post, on my PC at
least! I don't think you meant to change the title for a minute,
Graham. Jim changed it back to what it had been (warm and settled at
10 days) - and said so - so I'm not sure what you mean by your comment
about it remaining the same since somone decided it's really good fun
to change it. Maybe you'd like to change it back too! I'm sure it's
just a quirk of usenet.

Back on topic......12z shows lovely settled weather, right into the
middle of June. If it verifies, it scotches all notions of this summer
being a repeat of 2007, because 2007 had already descended into the
wet depths by the end of the first third of June and it adds some
early weight to the possibility of the Met Office's forecast being
correct - or being exceeded, in terms of heat and dryness - but who
knows on that one?

I'll extend my forecast to dry and settled, for much of the UK, to the
14th after the last 2 days' ouput.

Paul

On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:33:26 -0700 (PDT), Dawlish wrote in


Heh! Maybe you see it differently! Your own post changed it again!

"Discussion subject changed to "The Dawlish book of quotes thread." by
Graham P Davis" - quote from what sits above your post, on my PC at
least! I don't think you meant to change the title for a minute,
Graham. Jim changed it back to what it had been (warm and settled at
10 days) - and said so - so I'm not sure what you mean by your comment
about it remaining the same since somone decided it's really good fun
to change it. Maybe you'd like to change it back too! I'm sure it's
just a quirk of usenet.

I guess when you've are more familiar with Usenet, you'll understand Graham
did *not* change the subject. If you look at the headers of each post,
you'll see a line.

Subject: The Dawlish book of quotes thread.

That was in the headers of the post *you* made at 14.35 on the 3rd and
Graham's reply merely retained that header, and thus the subject. Your
main problem lies with using the Google interface to Usenet. Google
clearly doesn't thread properly as a proper newsreader does.

Here are the full headers of your post at 14.35

Path:
uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!postnews.google.com!z72g2000hsb.googlegr oups.com!not-for-mail
From: Dawlish
Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather
Subject: The Dawlish book of quotes thread.
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 06:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 55
Message-ID:

References:



uoWdnYE4rq4vZNnVnZ2dnUVZ8qrinZ2d@plusnet

NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.150.44.239
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1212500157 29341 127.0.0.1 (3 Jun 2008 13:35:57
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:35:57 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.150.44.239;
posting-account=usX-MAoAAACICaMkl-EkxzA1zuYSQ4uB
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET
CLR
1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

Note it even contains the IP address of your PC - 78.150.44.239, something
many would not be happy with.

--
Mike Tullett - Coleraine 55.13°N 6.69°W posted 04/06/2008 19:51:35 GMT

In article
,
Dawlish writes:
On Jun 4, 10:33*am, Graham P Davis wrote:
Dawlish wrote:
Nah. I'd never wish to filter anyone out. I've always got the choice
as to whether to reply to people who are talking out of their bum, or
completely ignore them because they are talking out of their bum - and
I'm getting much better at the latter! I don't quite see why you
changed the thread title again, Jim.

Jim didn't change the subject; the sequence is unbroken from Michael's
original change.

--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. * *E-mail: newsman, not newsboy.

Heh! Maybe you see it differently! Your own post changed it again!

"Discussion subject changed to "The Dawlish book of quotes thread." by
Graham P Davis" - quote from what sits above your post, on my PC at
least! I don't think you meant to change the title for a minute,
Graham. Jim changed it back to what it had been (warm and settled at
10 days) - and said so - so I'm not sure what you mean by your comment
about it remaining the same since somone decided it's really good fun
to change it. Maybe you'd like to change it back too! I'm sure it's
just a quirk of usenet.

No, it's a quirk of Googlegroups, which is evidently not coping well
with what has happened in this thread. The only person to change the
subject heading to "The Dawlish book of quotes thread" was
Weatherlawyer, in his response to your original post. In a couple of
subsequent branches, Nick Gardner and Jim Smith reset the subject to
your original wording. However no-one has changed it back in this
particular branch. [Until now, as I've just done so in this post.]
--
John Hall
"Three o'clock is always too late or too early
for anything you want to do."
Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980)

I'll extend my forecast to dry and settled, for much of the UK, to the
14th after the last 2 days' ouput.

Paul

I had my first swim in the sea (without wetsuit) of the year on the 8th of
June last year, on a lovely, hot and humid Sunday afternoon. Then things
went downhill and I didn't swim in the sea again until early August. Though
after that I made up for it, especially towards the end of August and into
September.

I had a brief swim this year, without wetsuit on the 11th May, which ranks
as very early but it was a tad on the cool side. I am still awaiting a
'proper' swim. The SST needs to warm up just a bit more, hopefully your
forecast will come true!!!

In 2005 & 2006 I was swimming nearly daily in the sea from mid-June through
to the end of September. Even though 2006 was a hotter summer, the sea felt
much warmer in 2005. I don't have any SST figures to back that up.

Let's drink to a good 'un.
________________
Nick.
Otter Valley, Devon
83 m amsl
http://www.ottervalley.co.uk

"Mike Tullett" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:33:26 -0700 (PDT), Dawlish wrote in


Heh! Maybe you see it differently! Your own post changed it again!

"Discussion subject changed to "The Dawlish book of quotes thread." by
Graham P Davis" - quote from what sits above your post, on my PC at
least! I don't think you meant to change the title for a minute,
Graham. Jim changed it back to what it had been (warm and settled at
10 days) - and said so - so I'm not sure what you mean by your comment
about it remaining the same since somone decided it's really good fun
to change it. Maybe you'd like to change it back too! I'm sure it's
just a quirk of usenet.

I guess when you've are more familiar with Usenet, you'll understand
Graham
did *not* change the subject. If you look at the headers of each post,
you'll see a line.

Subject: The Dawlish book of quotes thread.

That was in the headers of the post *you* made at 14.35 on the 3rd and
Graham's reply merely retained that header, and thus the subject. Your
main problem lies with using the Google interface to Usenet. Google
clearly doesn't thread properly as a proper newsreader does.

Here are the full headers of your post at 14.35

Path:
uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!postnews.google.com!z72g2000hsb.googlegr oups.com!not-for-mail
From: Dawlish
Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather
Subject: The Dawlish book of quotes thread.
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 06:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 55
Message-ID:

References:



uoWdnYE4rq4vZNnVnZ2dnUVZ8qrinZ2d@plusnet

NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.150.44.239
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1212500157 29341 127.0.0.1 (3 Jun 2008
13:35:57
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:35:57 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.150.44.239;
posting-account=usX-MAoAAACICaMkl-EkxzA1zuYSQ4uB
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET
CLR
1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: uni-berlin.de uk.sci.weather:258210

Note it even contains the IP address of your PC - 78.150.44.239, something
many would not be happy with.


LOL.

And I thought this thread was getting boring. :-)

Will
--

On Jun 4, 8:51*pm, Mike Tullett wrote:
Mike Tullett - Coleraine 55.13°N 6.69°W *posted 04/06/2008 19:51:35 *GMT

Thanks for making that and my IP address clear Mike. I understand the
process now. It's my choice to use google, as many others do on usenet
(are they all wrong too). I've investigated using other methods and,
quite frankly, I can't be bothered to get more familiar. Maybe that's
a failing - but I promise not to deliberately publicise anyone's
personal details. My query to Jim sprang from a lack of knowledge with
absolutely no malice whatsoever; Jim realised that and was polite in
answering, which I appreciated. I'm not sure where you come from with
your intervention.

Is there any chance of replying to my discussions about the weather,
or will you, instead, come back with a post criticising my choice of
access to usenet, or give further patronising comments on my lack of
knowledge about your (obviously you believe to be correct) method of
access, or even another revelation of further personal details? Or
maybe you'd even go as far as criticising the change of the thread
title in the first place - which you singularly failed to comment on
and by the lack of comment, you appear to show sympathy with? Like I
implied, I'm not bothered about the thread title change; everyone can
read the original title and everyone knows the person who changed it.
I am concerned about postings to deliberately highlight personal
identities to make a point.

Paul

"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
On Jun 4, 8:51 pm, Mike Tullett wrote:
Mike Tullett - Coleraine 55.13°N 6.69°W posted 04/06/2008 19:51:35 GMT

Thanks for making that and my IP address clear Mike. I understand the
process now. It's my choice to use google, as many others do on usenet
(are they all wrong too). Paul

Dear god, Paul, will you please get a life!

I was happy to see you posting somewhere again after you left TWO and I
appreciated seeing your interpretation of the models. Heck, I even enjoyed
the banter with Weatherlawyer! However if Mike didn't highlight your
misunderstandings of how the thread title works then I would have.

Don't have a go at him just because he was showing up the weaknesses of
Google! It's not the first time I've seen you post recently where you seem
to challenge the intent of a post, intentional or not. These guys have been
posting here a very long time as you know and you're among the very few to
react this way... This isn't TWO thank god - far more civil...at least it
was until now and for me to become embroiled well, hey....


Joe