On Jul 22, 2:44 am, Blue wrote:

Just look at the title of the programme.

The programme was clearly polemic and as such what requirement is
there to be impartial?

Who, watching a programme with a title like that expected the subject
matter to be impartial? The programme was obviously written to present
a case or a counter case or an academic position.

As such the judgement was a nonsense.

While the programme's name 'swindle', may to some seem bias.
I think it has to be so called that because of ALL the unequal treatment
the subject has got since inception.

I'm sure they would have called it 'another fair balanced look'
but since you've had this and that music do and having in taught in
schools as fact - you can't.

I find the programme was balanced, when considering all the bias stuff
that's gone unchallanged before by ofcom etc.

If Brown needs to replace some cash for his Northern Rock disaster,
instead of beating on the poorly educated, he should stand up to the EU haha
and tell them where to stick their landfill fines. And the rest of their extortion.
The gutless wonder.

I'm sure you have made some very fine points. Is there any chance of
an interpretation of them?