Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 10:08*pm, terry tibbs wrote:
over an hour of heavy snow now. settling everywhere. no warnings at all from met office. None out for snow in the Northern Ireland, West Midlands, Wales today and then the higher routes in the SW this evening either. But watch it develop. I did put an update on my site about snow heading SE at 2.00pm yesterday |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Oct, 07:39, Dawlish wrote:
I did put an update on my site about snow heading SE at 2.00pm yesterday And I'm sure there were multiple red flashing weather warnings out for Metcheque, WeatherOutlook, Netweather.tv, UKWeatherWorld etc. etc. - this is my gripe about multiple weather sites all posting their own warnings, it's just duplication. Regarding the MO, clearly they didn't feel it warranted a warning and they have access to more data than all of us put together. Richard |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 10:22*am, Richard Dixon wrote:
On 29 Oct, 07:39, Dawlish wrote: I did put an update on my site about snow heading SE at 2.00pm yesterday And I'm sure there were multiple red flashing weather warnings out for Metcheque, WeatherOutlook, Netweather.tv, UKWeatherWorld etc. etc. - this is my gripe about multiple weather sites all posting their own warnings, it's just duplication. Regarding the MO, clearly they didn't feel it warranted a warning and they have access to more data than all of us put together. Richard UPDATE 10.43. METO CATCHING UP! WEATHER WARNINGS FOR HEAVY SNOW ISSUED AT 0831 IN NORTHERN IRELAND AND AT 1014 FOR SNOW OVER MUCH OF WALES. http://totallyweatherandclimate.co.uk/ They are playing catch-up today Richard........with all that technology too. *)) I think the MetO are the best in the world, but that warnings site is a complete dog's breakfast. NO snow warnings in England yesterday and the most unusual October snow north of London, for a long, long time. I know the re-look is under way. I know that what was said in the Pitt review willl be employed in the re- structuring, but that MetO warnings site is exactly what I've said it is, to most people - a complete dog's breakfast. It's not trusted anything like as well as it should be and events such as yesterday, added to the myriad warnings of heavy rain that produced very few severe weather events this summer, only reduce that trust in the system. Use the many other sites in conjunction with the MetO and make your own mind up would be my advice. We can...............but how does an elderly person, or a poorly educated person manage to do that? I feel you are defending the indefensible - and the site will almost certainly change over the next 12 months. If it doesn't; it runs the risk of becoming irrelevant. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:09:57 -0700 (PDT), Dawlish
wrote: ....but how does an elderly person, or a poorly educated person manage to do that? I'm seventy-one. I have no difficulty. Please define elderly. -- Alan White Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Lochs Long and Goil in Argyll, Scotland. Webcam and weather:- http://windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/weather Walks and Treks:- http://windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/walks |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Oct, 11:09, Dawlish wrote:
UPDATE 10.43. METO CATCHING UP! WEATHER WARNINGS FOR HEAVY SNOW ISSUED AT 0831 IN NORTHERN IRELAND AND AT 1014 FOR SNOW OVER MUCH OF WALES.http://totallyweatherandclimate.co.uk/ Yes thanks for advertising one of the plethora of duplicative weather websites around. They are playing catch-up today Richard........with all that technology too. *)) Enough people seem to have gripes about the MO wherever possible, it seems to be a common trait of the weather enthusiast. Are you the new Jon Witty? NO snow warnings in England yesterday and the most unusual October snow north of London, for a long, long time. I'd assumed they would have done which yes does surprise me but it's not as if they don't have all the information at their fingertips. Maybe Steve Willington (sp.?!) can come on here and say why no warnings were issued. The TAFs yesterday certainly warned of moderate snowfall so it's as if they weren't caught unawares by snowfall. MetO warnings site is exactly what I've said it is, to most people - a complete dog's breakfast. I log on to www.metoffice.com and if there's a weather warning out, it's at the top banner. I can quickly see if my area is going to be affected if there's a colour in my region. I wouldn't call it a dog's breakfast. It's not trusted anything like as well as it should be Says who? Is there a survey on this or just your opinion? I feel you are defending the indefensible - and the site will almost certainly change over the next 12 months. I'm not defending the indefensible, I'm merely saying that there are people with brains in the Met Office who are actually aware of what was happening. You give the impression that only a passing thought goes into this. it runs the risk of becoming irrelevant And everyone starts using the other weather websites? I rather doubt it. IMHO my main criticism of the Met Office is a centralisation of everything - I could imagine that having regional weather offices might improve the "on-the-spot" nature of weather warnings. Richard |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dawlish" Snipped the rubbish and spam. Abuse report submitted to BTInternet for [86.148.157.11] Hostname: host86-148-157-11.range86-148.btcentralplus.com IP Address: 86.148.157.11 For continuous spamming of his website. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 11:09*am, Dawlish wrote:
On Oct 29, 10:22*am, Richard Dixon wrote: On 29 Oct, 07:39, Dawlish wrote: I did put an update on my site about snow heading SE at 2.00pm yesterday And I'm sure there were multiple red flashing weather warnings out for Metcheque, WeatherOutlook, Netweather.tv, UKWeatherWorld etc. etc. - this is my gripe about multiple weather sites all posting their own warnings, it's just duplication. Regarding the MO, clearly they didn't feel it warranted a warning and they have access to more data than all of us put together. Richard UPDATE 10.43. METO CATCHING UP! WEATHER WARNINGS FOR HEAVY SNOW ISSUED AT 0831 IN NORTHERN IRELAND AND AT 1014 FOR SNOW OVER MUCH OF WALES.http://totallyweatherandclimate.co.uk/ They are playing catch-up today Richard........with all that technology too. *)) *I think the MetO are the best in the world, but that warnings site is a complete dog's breakfast. NO snow warnings in England yesterday and the most unusual October snow north of London, for a long, long time. I know the re-look is under way. I know that what was said in the Pitt review willl be employed in the re- structuring, but that MetO warnings site is exactly what I've said it is, to most people - a complete dog's breakfast. It's not trusted anything like as well as it should be and events such as yesterday, added to the myriad warnings of heavy rain that produced very few severe weather events this summer, only reduce that trust in the system. Use the many other sites in conjunction with the MetO and make your own mind up would be my advice. We can...............but how does an elderly person, or a poorly educated person manage to do that? I feel you are defending the indefensible - and the site will almost certainly change over the next 12 months. If it doesn't; it runs the risk of becoming irrelevant. I can't see much wrong with the site. One can criticise it at times for warnings that are a bit over the top or, as on this occasion, that are not there at all though as far as I know the recent snow caused no disruption over southern England and was thought not to warrant a warning. It has been said many times on this group, rightly, that over-use of warnings will lead to a reduction in the impact of warnings as a whole. As to the site's style and useability I'd say anyone who can use the web can use that site satisfactorily and get information from it even if that information is sometimes less than perfect. But that's weather forecasting for you. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 4:02*pm, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Oct 29, 11:09*am, Dawlish wrote: On Oct 29, 10:22*am, Richard Dixon wrote: On 29 Oct, 07:39, Dawlish wrote: I did put an update on my site about snow heading SE at 2.00pm yesterday And I'm sure there were multiple red flashing weather warnings out for Metcheque, WeatherOutlook, Netweather.tv, UKWeatherWorld etc. etc. - this is my gripe about multiple weather sites all posting their own warnings, it's just duplication. Regarding the MO, clearly they didn't feel it warranted a warning and they have access to more data than all of us put together. Richard UPDATE 10.43. METO CATCHING UP! WEATHER WARNINGS FOR HEAVY SNOW ISSUED AT 0831 IN NORTHERN IRELAND AND AT 1014 FOR SNOW OVER MUCH OF WALES.http://totallyweatherandclimate.co.uk/ They are playing catch-up today Richard........with all that technology too. *)) *I think the MetO are the best in the world, but that warnings site is a complete dog's breakfast. NO snow warnings in England yesterday and the most unusual October snow north of London, for a long, long time. I know the re-look is under way. I know that what was said in the Pitt review willl be employed in the re- structuring, but that MetO warnings site is exactly what I've said it is, to most people - a complete dog's breakfast. It's not trusted anything like as well as it should be and events such as yesterday, added to the myriad warnings of heavy rain that produced very few severe weather events this summer, only reduce that trust in the system. Use the many other sites in conjunction with the MetO and make your own mind up would be my advice. We can...............but how does an elderly person, or a poorly educated person manage to do that? I feel you are defending the indefensible - and the site will almost certainly change over the next 12 months. If it doesn't; it runs the risk of becoming irrelevant. * * * I can't see much wrong with the site. *One can criticise it at times for warnings that are a bit over the top or, as on this occasion, that are not there at all though as far as I know the recent snow caused no disruption over southern England and was thought not to warrant a warning. And it wasn't heavy or long lasting. It went from drizzle to sleet with a bit of snow in between. Mind me, that is hardly Bracknell. Not that we sheep are that hardy this far oop nurth. What kind of kittens doss in Bracknell these days? Is it about time someone invaded us? We are getting soft. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
bracknell, white out conditions, wheres the warnings! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
bracknell, heavy snow, wheres the warnings! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Wheres this Azores High westward push? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Wheres all the snow gone??? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
wheres the weather posts? | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) |