Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 8:51*am, Joe Egginton wrote:
Dawlish wrote: dearie me. *I quite liked you up till now, Dawlish. *'Twas you who quoted this rubbish in the first place, I have W killfiled and only see his witterings if you quote him. I just wish you'd shut up sniping, all of you (and that includes you too, Dave R), and concentrate on the weather. -- Kate B PS 'elvira' is spamtrapped - please reply to 'elviraspam' at cockaigne dot org dot uk if you want to reply personally- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'll try again. "You are not just a penis but you are a sexist and offensive penis". You'd never write anything like that; neither would I, nor would most on here (not all, I admit!). This is the foul, abusive rubbish that W comes out with and there are people on here, one of them in the post above this that don't just tolerate him, but encourage him to comtinue his policy of attempting to belittle others, if they disagree with his left-field pseudo-science. I think it is worth highlighting this. You obviously don't like what he says and to killfile him, you must have felt in a similar way to me, in the past. Indeed, I'll bet you've said similar things before you killfiled him. So why so morally indignant now? There are various tastes in society. *By killfiling Weatherlawyer then you are letting him continue his diatribes. *Would it not be better to reason with him, and gently led him back into the fold. *Has Hoover said, "I rather have the *******s ****ing out, than ****ing in". -- Joe Egginton Wolverhampton 175m asl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Appeasement Joe? I've never been one for allowing abusers and bullies (or purveyors of such pseudoscience as W constantly produces) to get their own way without challenge. I don't agree with Killfiling anybody. All that does is allows you to be all 3 of the monkeys for that person, whilst criticising anyone that brings the abuser back into your range - that's what Kate's done, transferring her ire in the process onto me. That's far easier than dealing directly with W, as you know what you'll get from that quarter in the end. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Dawlish wrote
On Oct 29, 11:29*pm, Kate Brown wrote: snip dearie me. *I quite liked you up till now, Dawlish. *'Twas you who quoted this rubbish in the first place, I have W killfiled and only see his witterings if you quote him. I just wish you'd shut up sniping, all of you (and that includes you too, Dave R), and concentrate on the weather. snip You obviously don't like what he says and to killfile him, you must have felt in a similar way to me, in the past. Indeed, I'll bet you've said similar things before you killfiled him. So why so morally indignant now? I think you don't understand quite how Usenet works, especially as you seem to be using Googlegroups. If you quote someone else's post in your reply, everyone can see it. I myself should have edited earlier, it's true. I don't want to killfile you, Dawlish, because your weather posts interest me, but I'm really sick of all this sniping, and wish you would all just stick to the weather. I consider this topic now closed and have killfiled the thread, which was a typical example of the most obnoxious stuff this group sadly can produce. -- Kate B PS 'elvira' is spamtrapped - please reply to 'elviraspam' at cockaigne dot org dot uk if you want to reply personally |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Kate Brown writes: I just wish you'd shut up sniping, all of you (and that includes you too, Dave R), and concentrate on the weather. Hear, hear! -- John Hall "It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless information." Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 9:47*am, Kate Brown wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Dawlish wrote On Oct 29, 11:29*pm, Kate Brown wrote: snip dearie me. *I quite liked you up till now, Dawlish. *'Twas you who quoted this rubbish in the first place, I have W killfiled and only see his witterings if you quote him. I just wish you'd shut up sniping, all of you (and that includes you too, Dave R), and concentrate on the weather. snip You obviously don't like what he says and to killfile him, you must have felt in a similar way to me, in the past. Indeed, I'll bet you've said similar things before you killfiled him. So why so morally indignant now? I think you don't understand quite how Usenet works, especially as you seem to be using Googlegroups. *If you quote someone else's post in your reply, everyone can see it. *I myself should have edited earlier, it's true. *I don't want to killfile you, Dawlish, because your weather posts interest me, but I'm really sick of all this sniping, and wish you would all just stick to the weather. *I consider this topic now closed and have killfiled the thread, which was a typical example of the most obnoxious stuff this group sadly can produce. -- Kate B PS 'elvira' is spamtrapped - please reply to 'elviraspam' at cockaigne dot org dot uk if you want to reply personally I do understand Kate, but I don't understand the Killfile mentality. This format is so unbelievably dated and it harks back to earlier days of the Internet. That's why so few use it. However, there are some very good people who are well worth reading each day on here. I like to see the weather reports and Colin's summaries aspecially, but the discussions are often lame - until some entertainment comes round! There are always people who are "sick of all this sniping", but if it didn't interest them (and you) they (and you) wouldn't reply! It's just an excuse for most to steal the moral high ground, which I never mind. Glad you find my weather stuff interesting. There's a lot more on our site. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Dawlish writes: snip This format is so unbelievably dated and it harks back to earlier days of the Internet. That's why so few use it. Usenet has much better functionality than most Web forums, but since you're accessing it via Google you're missing out on much of that. It's true that it's now less popular than Web forums, but that's because many people are impressed by fancy graphics. -- John Hall "It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless information." Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:12:17 +0000, John Hall wrote:
In article , Kate Brown writes: I just wish you'd shut up sniping, all of you (and that includes you too, Dave R), and concentrate on the weather. Hear, hear! Hear, hear from me too :-) Petty squabbling is most unbecoming of this group. -- MCC |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 2:39*pm, MCC wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:12:17 +0000, John Hall wrote: In article , *Kate Brown writes: I just wish you'd shut up sniping, all of you (and that includes you too, Dave R), and concentrate on the weather. Hear, hear! Hear, hear from me too :-) Petty squabbling is most unbecoming of this group. -- MCC Impyling, or course, that "this group" has a high moral value. This discussion is an interesting angle on morality and values. "This group" includes everyone that posts in it and if "petty squabbles" occur (and they do, with regularity and they provide a great deal of interest, for me and others), then "petty squabbles", by definition, are not unbecoming of the group, but an integral part of it. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 10:59*am, John Hall wrote:
In article ,*Dawlis h writes: snip This format is so unbelievably dated and it harks back to earlier days of the Internet. That's why so few use it. Usenet has much better functionality than most Web forums, but since you're accessing it via Google you're missing out on much of that. It's true that it's now less popular than Web forums, but that's because many people are impressed by fancy graphics. -- John Hall * * * * * *"It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless * * * * * * information." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) That could be because "fancy graphics(!)" are far more interesting - which is why they attract far more people. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 11:29*pm, Kate Brown wrote:
dearie me. *I quite liked you up till now, Dawlish. * -- Kate B - Show quoted text - So the penny has finally dropped. Join the club. Tudor Hughes |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 31, 2:43*am, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Oct 29, 11:29*pm, Kate Brown wrote: dearie me. *I quite liked you up till now, Dawlish. * -- Kate B - Show quoted text - * *So the penny has finally dropped. *Join the club. Tudor Hughes I doubt whether Kate would like to join any club of which you are a member, T. After your memorable use of a particular word on here, you are the same club as W. Abuse-is-us. Sorry I haven't got a smiley of someone being sick. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bubble Cloud? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Plimer Thought Bubble Bombs ... | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Bonzo lies again: Plimer thought bubble bombs | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Green Car Bubble Bursts | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Willetts Bubble | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |