Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like Feb will end up 0.1 or 0.2 degC above the
1971-2000 mean. That will, of course, put it well above the 61-90, 51-80 and 41-70 means. The Febs of 2003, 2005 and 2006 were all a little colder by this measure. That will give a winter quarter CET of 3.7°C which is 0.7degC below the 1971-2000 mean, but only 0.1degC below the 1941-70 mean. Compare recent winters: 2005-06 4.3°C 2000-01 4.5°C 1996-97 4.0°C 1995-96 3.0°C The winter quarter was colder in: 1995-96 3.0°C 1990-91 3.0°C 1986-87 3.6°C 1985-86 2.9°C 1984-85 2.9°C 1981-82 2.8°C 1978-79 1.8°C 1976-77 3.3°C. Seven of the winters in the 1960s were colder. Who wants to tell Channel Four? (c) Philip Eden |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Feb, 12:01, "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote:
Seven of the winters in the 1960s were colder. Who wants to tell Channel Four? I am "looking forward" to this snow programme with much trepidation. How can you write a 60-minute programme on a snow event which has happened all of about 4 weeks ago? Is there really enough material to detail the event? Will it be lots of soundbites from professional C- list retrospective programme celebrities like Trevor Nelson and Paul Ross on how they couldn't get into to work that day? They don't even have the "why weren't we warned element" this time to pad out a good 20 minutes of mildly angry whining about the Met Office, so maybe this 20 minutes will be allocated to why the local councils didn't listen to the Met Office and/or the "lack of grit" bombshell with extensive interviews with the British Board of Salt. Fair enough the last show about the UK Storm-chaser made an hour of interesting viewing as it was quite quirky and was as much human as it was meteorological, but an hour on a snow event? Please. Documentary cynic? Me? Richard |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message ... Looks like Feb will end up 0.1 or 0.2 degC above the 1971-2000 mean. That will, of course, put it well above the 61-90, 51-80 and 41-70 means. The Febs of 2003, 2005 and 2006 were all a little colder by this measure. That will give a winter quarter CET of 3.7°C which is 0.7degC below the 1971-2000 mean, but only 0.1degC below the 1941-70 mean. Compare recent winters: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...r20090225.html suggests a Winter Dec-Feb of 3.2c for England. "Coldest for a decade" Phil |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
8 to 15 October 2012. 2nd Quarter @ 07:33. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Second quarter rainfall total | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Summer quarter 2009: Synoptic Overview | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Winter 2006/7 CET (Dec-Feb) Poll | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Marches that had a lower CET than the preceding winter's CET in the last 100 years | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |