Here is a summary of the latest NWP output for noon (GMT) on Tuesday. Issued
0453z, 28th August 2009.

The middle of next week will see SW'lies across the UK and the NW/SE split
will continue; the majority of the rain will be in the north and west.

ECMWF: http://www.wzkarten.de/pics/Recm1201.gif
A slack low lies to the WNW, leading to SW'lies. SW'lies persist on day 6
and on day 7 they strengthen as a low deepens to the WNW.

MetO: http://www.wzkarten.de/pics/Rukm1201.gif
The UK lies under SW'lies, with a low to the north and a trough to the west.
There's little change on day 6.

GFS: http://www.wzkarten.de/pics/Rtavn1201.png
SW'lies cover the UK, with complex low pressure to the NW and north. Strong
to gale SSW'lies move over the UK on day 6 as a trough approaches from the
west and on day 7 the winds become westerlies for all as the trough moves
away to the east.

GEM: http://www.wzkarten.de/pics/Rgem1201.gif
The Canadian run brings SW'lies with a low to the north.

JMA: http://www.wzkarten.de/pics/Rjma1201.gif
The Japanese run has a trough to the west and a slack southerly flow over
the UK.

On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 at 04:54:55, Darren Prescott
wrote in uk.sci.weather :

Here is a summary of the latest NWP output for noon (GMT) on Tuesday.
Issued 0453z, 28th August 2009.

The middle of next week will see SW'lies across the UK and the NW/SE
split will continue; the majority of the rain will be in the north and
west.

Own up - you just keep cutting & pasting the above...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me)

"Paul Hyett" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 at 04:54:55, Darren Prescott
wrote in uk.sci.weather :

Here is a summary of the latest NWP output for noon (GMT) on Tuesday.
Issued 0453z, 28th August 2009.

The middle of next week will see SW'lies across the UK and the NW/SE split
will continue; the majority of the rain will be in the north and west.

Own up - you just keep cutting & pasting the above...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me)

It might seem like it, but blame the weather, not Darren!!!

I hope, Darren, that this morning's posting as a "reply" to your posting of
20th August is an aberration. With the standard Virgin setup they would
become increasing difficult to locate, since they would be displayed below
all postings from the 20th onwards. Normally of course they appear as the
first posting of the current day.

Best regards and thanks for all your hard work

Roger

In article ,
Roger Smith writes:
I hope, Darren, that this morning's posting as a "reply" to your posting of
20th August is an aberration.

It wasn't, but there was a typo in the subject line, with "(20/08/09)"
instead of "(28/08/09)". If it appeared as though it was a reply to the
original 20/08/09 post, then your newsreader must thread on subject line
rather than on the References header.
--
John Hall "Do you have cornflakes in America?"
"Well, actually, they're American."
"So what brings you to Britain then if you have cornflakes already?"
Bill Bryson: "Notes from a Small Island"

In article ,
John Hall writes:
In article ,
Roger Smith writes:
I hope, Darren, that this morning's posting as a "reply" to your posting of
20th August is an aberration.

It wasn't, but there was a typo in the subject line, with "(20/08/09)"
instead of "(28/08/09)". If it appeared as though it was a reply to the
original 20/08/09 post, then your newsreader must thread on subject line
rather than on the References header.

When I said "It wasn't" I meant that it wasn't a reply, in case I wasn't
clear.
--
John Hall "Do you have cornflakes in America?"
"Well, actually, they're American."
"So what brings you to Britain then if you have cornflakes already?"
Bill Bryson: "Notes from a Small Island"

"John Hall" wrote in message
...
In article ,
John Hall writes:
In article ,
Roger Smith writes:
I hope, Darren, that this morning's posting as a "reply" to your posting
of
20th August is an aberration.

It wasn't, but there was a typo in the subject line, with "(20/08/09)"
instead of "(28/08/09)". If it appeared as though it was a reply to the
original 20/08/09 post, then your newsreader must thread on subject line
rather than on the References header.

When I said "It wasn't" I meant that it wasn't a reply, in case I wasn't
clear.
--
John Hall "Do you have cornflakes in America?"
"Well, actually, they're American."
"So what brings you to Britain then if you have cornflakes already?"
Bill Bryson: "Notes from a Small Island"

John

I realised it wasn't a reply as such, but I did not notice the typo in the
header. The newsreader therefore automatically placed the message under the
earlier message having the same subject line.

Best regards, Roger