Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 2, 12:19*am, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Alastair" wrote in message ... On Dec 1, 11:30 pm, Lawrence13 wrote: On Dec 1, 10:29 pm, Alastair wrote: On Dec 1, 10:13 pm, "Col" wrote: Natsman wrote: On 1 Dec, 22:13, Bonos Ego wrote: revelations. Clearly it is all a conspiracy despite the views of some of those on this forum who denied that there could possibly be any conspiracy in the AGW agenda. It was only a matter of time. The sad thing is that the whole shebang is driven by money, and the Bilderberg premise of global governance. Too many would have too much to lose if the bandwagon faltered now, so they'll press on regardless, steamrollering their way over those who question the science and motives, brainwashing those who are susceptible, and ignoring those who demur. Bilderberg group? I'm surprised you haven't mentioned The Illuminati and giant lizards..... It's potentially the biggest, most damaging scam mankind has experienced thus far - more so than any changing climate scenario could possibly be. Smoke and mirrors, lies and deceit, but certainly not science. And we'll all be the sadder, and poorer for it. What would be the *point* of such a conspiracy, to engineer a reason for us all to pay more taxes? You would have to persuade 10s of thousands of scientists all around the world, along with their Governments to go along with this scam. Why bother with such an elaborate scheme, even if it was possible to impliment? When politicians want to raise taxes they simply *lie* about it in the time honoured fashion, they don't cook up schemes that take 20 years to come to fruition! -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl This is a tragedy! A senior scientist, who has been been fighting against the ruthless campaign of disinformation financed by the US oil, coal and automotive industries, and orchestrated by the the extreme right wing politicians has been brought down for responding in kind. Cheers, Alastair.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Alastair people have a choice whether they want to buy oil or not which is more then can be said for the BBC license fee and Labour Party green taxes. You may have the choice of buying oil, but do the poor farmers in Bangladesh? Oil is now running out so your children and grandchildren will certainly not have that choice, and the Bangladeshis, along with everyone else too poor to buy their share of oil today, will never get any. The oil companies have no difficulty persuading the greedy people that that global warming is not a threat, because that is what they want to hear. *It not surprising that the scientists fudged the figures to get the message across. Cheers, Alastair.http://www.complexclimate.org Alastiar: what do you mean by greedy people? At least you accept the figures were "fudged" whatever you *mean by that? I mean the current generation in the first world countries who within about 100 years have burnt most of the world's store of oil. They have lived a life of Riley without any thought about how the following generations are going to cope without any oil. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dawlish wrote:
Such rubbish written about this from the deniers. Phil Jones really is a highly respected climate scientist. Fortunately there are thousands more like him that feel exactly the same way about the likelihood of CO2 driving GW and they have not all been subject to clearly illegal activity. While the deniers think they've stopped GW, by intercepting some internal emails from some really frustrated scientists, it continues merrily on. 10 out of the last 11 years the warmest on record. Every month for the last 24 months being in the top 10 warmest for that month, despite a La Nina, a solar minimum and a negative PDO for the first year of those 24. Look at the outcomes and deny them. Phil Jones is not the problem; rising global temperatures are the problem. No, the problem is that the rewriting of history, the denial of the MWP makes current temperatures seem more significant than they realy are. Current temperatures are not record-breaking, extreme, or dangerous, they are mundane. -- Sleepalot aa #1385 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
EPA ready to Step in if Climate Legistation Fails | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
EPA ready to Step in if Climate Legistation Fails | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
UK climate scientist to temporarily step down | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
EPA takes first step toward climate change regs | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
EPA takes first step toward climate change regs | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |