http://www.metoffice.com/corporate/p...20091208a.html

.... to go to the explanation ...

http://www.metoffice.com/climatechan...g/subsets.html

and the datasets are available he-

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatec...erence/All.zip

NB: the station numbers have an additional '0' appended, thus Heathrow
(03772) is listed as 037720 etc.

Martin.


--
Martin Rowley
West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl
Lat: 50.82N Long: 01.88W
NGR: SU 082 023

On 8 Dec, 09:58, "Martin Rowley"
wrote:
http://www.metoffice.com/corporate/p...20091208a.html

... to go to the explanation ...

http://www.metoffice.com/climatechan...g/subsets.html

and the datasets are available he-

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatec...oring/referenc...

NB: the station numbers have an additional '0' appended, thus Heathrow
(03772) is listed as 037720 etc.

Martin.

--
Martin Rowley
West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl
Lat: 50.82N * Long: 01.88W
NGR: SU 082 023

Excellent! Wonder what happened to group 01 Norway?

"Martin Rowley" wrote:

NB: the station numbers have an additional '0' appended, thus Heathrow
(03772) is listed as 037720 etc.

But these aren't raw data; they're monthly means! They've
already been heavily manipulated. Surely if these people
ask for the raw data, they should be supplied with
them ... that is, the raw observations, hourly or half-hourly,
latterly 1-minute or 5-minute logged obs, including all the other
elements. Should fill several warehouses, I reckon. Might keep
them quiet for a while.

Philip

On Dec 8, 11:37*am, "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom
wrote:
"Martin Rowley" wrote:
NB: the station numbers have an additional '0' appended, thus Heathrow
(03772) is listed as 037720 etc.

But these aren't raw data; they're monthly means! *They've
already been heavily manipulated. *Surely if these people
ask for the raw data, they should be supplied with
them ... that is, the raw observations, hourly or half-hourly,
latterly 1-minute or 5-minute logged obs, including all the other
elements. Should fill several warehouses, I reckon. Might keep
them quiet for a while.

Philip

Roger Brugge doesn't seem to mind that the data I send to COL
has been "heavily manipulated". Little does he know. :-)

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

On 8 Dec, 17:23, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Dec 8, 11:37*am, "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom
wrote:

"Martin Rowley" wrote:
NB: the station numbers have an additional '0' appended, thus Heathrow
(03772) is listed as 037720 etc.

But these aren't raw data; they're monthly means! *They've
already been heavily manipulated. *Surely if these people
ask for the raw data, they should be supplied with
them ... that is, the raw observations, hourly or half-hourly,
latterly 1-minute or 5-minute logged obs, including all the other
elements. Should fill several warehouses, I reckon. Might keep
them quiet for a while.

* * * Roger Brugge doesn't seem to mind that the data I send to COL
has been "heavily manipulated". * Little does he know. :-)

Funny but it makes one think.

On 8 Dec, 17:51, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On 8 Dec, 17:23, Tudor Hughes wrote:

* * * Roger Brugge doesn't seem to mind that the data I send to COL
has been "heavily manipulated". * Little does he know. :-)

Funny but it makes one think.- Hide quoted text -

Not so funny when you consider how detailed the shape of things to
come have been improved by peer pressure and not air pressu

"This subset is not a new global temperature record and it does not
replace the HadCRUT, NASA GISS and NCDC global temperature records,
all of which have been fully peer-reviewed. This subset shows that
global-average land temperatures have risen over the last 150 years
and is very similar to the temperature rises shown by the complete
data set."