Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"odious stink" whined impotently after reading a posting from:
On Dec 10, 1:43 am, Dawlish wrote: Kent Deatheridge sputtered: --- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AGW is fatally wounded. Now it is just a matter of watching the ignorant beast die. And the humor of the idiots and algore as they try to deny this very inconvenient TRUTH. HAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHA KD A scientific denier (you don't see HAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHA written in many scietific journals. What you've written is complete twaddle. there are *5* measures of global temperatures, 2 from satellite measurements. All agree on the fact that there has been warming over the last 30 years Actually, no. Actually, yes.. The all agree there has been no warming Got a cite for that, stink? --I didn't think so.. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hansen colleague rejected IPCC AR4 ES as having "no scientific merit", but what does IPCC do? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
UN and IPCC using fraudulent graphs in attempt to extort 100 billion dollars | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
UN and IPCC using fraudulent graphs in attempt to extort 100 billion dollars | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
UN and IPCC using fraudulent graphs in attempt to extort 100 billion dollars | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
UN and IPCC using fraudulent graphs in attempt to extort 100 billion dollars | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |