On Jan 19, 3:04*pm, Seebs wrote:
THE CORE RULES OF NETIQUETTEhttp://www.albion.com/netiquette/corerules..html

The humor value of a notorious crossposter and spammer quoting this is
high.

I am not a notorious crossposter; my crossposting is
legitimate. You have never proved my crossposting is
inappropriate in any way. Also, I do not spam; this is
your own inappropriate term. Further, whatever humor here is
a product of your prejudice.

Bottom line - I am still waiting for you to show me
respect before I would engage in answering your question.

Have you ever considered studying Quaker beliefs and practice, which
absolutely do not include demanding particular formalized guestures of
"respect" from people?

It was not a demand on my part; you can't read without
slanting things; that's on you.

Of course not.

Because I was a Friend (Quaker) for 28 years, I do not
need your advice on this point.

*The point is that it's an excuse

It is not an excuse.

not to try to answer
a question because, as you've said yourself,

I have NEVER said this.

if you answer questions in
your own words, people might hurt your feelings by criticizing your
answers.


That's your point and opinion, which is completely wrong.

To back up, climate science is unsettled according to Prof.
Lindzen of MIT. Further, because of Climategate and its
aftermath, intense questioning of the integrity of the 5
climate databases is currently taking place. I say to
interested usenetters - let's discusss it.

David Christainsen
Newton, Mass. USA

On Jan 19, 1:42*pm, Meteorologist wrote:

THE CORE RULES OF NETIQUETTEhttp://www.albion.com/netiquette/corerules.html


The humor value of a notorious crossposter and spammer quoting this is
high.


I am not a notorious crossposter;

Yes, you are.

my crossposting is
legitimate. *

LOL! Above you say you're not a crossposter, then in the next breath
you state you are a crossposter. Can you *be* any more of a doofus?

I take that back - yes, indeed, you can

You have never proved my crossposting is
inappropriate in any way. *Also, I do not spam; this is
your own inappropriate term. *Further, whatever humor here is
a product of your prejudice.



Have you ever considered studying Quaker beliefs and practice, which
absolutely do not include demanding particular formalized guestures of
"respect" from people?


It was not a demand on my part; you can't read without
slanting things; that's on you.

You are continually demanding this and that from others here.

Of course not.


Because I was a Friend (Quaker) for 28 years, I do not
need your advice on this point.

You don't need anyone's advice, do you...?

*The point is that it's an excuse


It is not an excuse.

You're full of excuses. It's what you do.

not to try to answer
a question because, as you've said yourself,
if you answer questions in
your own words, people might hurt your feelings by criticizing your
answers.


I have NEVER said this.

The truth of the matter has been proven previously.


I say to
interested usenetters - let's discusss it.

You don't discuss, you post cut-and-paste garbage. No one's
interested in your cutting-and-pasting, Davey (where's Goliath,
BTW? ;-).

[Goliath to Davey: "Davey...don't go in that mine shaft...! Mom and
Dad and Sally will be so upset!"]

On Jan 21, 10:11*pm, "(Kelly)" wrote:
...
You are continually demanding this and that from others here.
...

Liar!

David Christainsen
Newton, Mass. USA

On Jan 22, 6:36*am, Meteorologist wrote:

Liar!

Nope.