Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The glaciologist who exposed the erroneous statement that the Himalyan
glaciers would disappear by 2035 and has brought the house tumbling about the ears of the IPCC, thinks that the whole matter is like worrying about a mouse, while ignoring the elephant in the room. You can read his long defence he http://environmentalresearchweb.org/...eres-a-mo.html Cheers, Alastair. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 11:39*pm, Alastair wrote:
The glaciologist who exposed the erroneous statement that the Himalyan glaciers would disappear by 2035 and has brought the house tumbling about the ears of the IPCC, thinks that the whole matter is like worrying about a mouse, while ignoring the elephant in the room. You can read his long defence hehttp://environmentalresearchweb.org/...yan-glaciers-t... Cheers, Alastair. I thought I had prefixed the subject with [GW] :-( Cheers, Alastair. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:41:58 -0800, Alastair wrote:
I thought I had prefixed the subject with [GW] :-( Cheers, Alastair. You did. At least, both your posts show that prefix here. -- Bewdley, Worcs. ~90m asl. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 11:41*pm, Alastair wrote:
On Jan 26, 11:39*pm, Alastair wrote: The glaciologist who exposed the erroneous statement that the Himalyan glaciers would disappear by 2035 and has brought the house tumbling about the ears of the IPCC, thinks that the whole matter is like worrying about a mouse, while ignoring the elephant in the room. You can read his long defence hehttp://environmentalresearchweb.org/...yan-glaciers-t... Cheers, Alastair. I thought I had prefixed the subject with [GW] :-( Cheers, Alastair. Third time lucky? Cheers, Alastair. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 26, 11:43*pm, David Buttery wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:41:58 -0800, Alastair wrote: I thought I had prefixed the subject with [GW] :-( Cheers, Alastair. You did. At least, both your posts show that prefix here. -- Bewdley, Worcs. ~90m asl. They did not show up on Google but the (GW) does. I will use that in future. Cheers, Alastair. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alastair" wrote in message ... The glaciologist who exposed the erroneous statement that the Himalyan glaciers would disappear by 2035 and has brought the house tumbling about the ears of the IPCC, thinks that the whole matter is like worrying about a mouse, while ignoring the elephant in the room. You can read his long defence he http://environmentalresearchweb.org/...eres-a-mo.html Cheers, Alastair. But Alastair it wasn't the truth was it yet it was proclaimed to be the definitive word on Glacial retreat, it was actually admitted to as being used to increase political pressure. By the way I have no connection with big oil although I did purchase some sesame seed oil for the occasional stir fry the other day. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:46:16 -0800, Alastair wrote:
They did not show up on Google but the (GW) does. I will use that in future. Cheers, Alastair. Interesting... I wonder whether Google strips out anything in square brackets. (I don't use it so don't know.) -- Bewdley, Worcs. ~90m asl. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 27, 12:09*am, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"Alastair" wrote in message ... The glaciologist who exposed the erroneous statement that the Himalyan glaciers would disappear by 2035 and has brought the house tumbling about the ears of the IPCC, thinks that the whole matter is like worrying about a mouse, while ignoring the elephant in the room. You can read his long defence he http://environmentalresearchweb.org/...yan-glaciers-t... Cheers, Alastair. But Alastair it wasn't the truth was it? Yet it was proclaimed to be the definitive word on Glacial retreat! It was actually admitted to as being used to increase political pressure. It was not proclaimed as the definitive word on glacial retreat, any more than is the melting of the snow cap on Mt Kilimanjaro. All the world's glaciers are in retreat, apart from a few exceptions. Lawrence, isn't that the truth? By the way I have no connection with big oil although I did purchase some sesame seed oil for the occasional*stir fry the other day. I never thought you were paid by big oil, nor even that your thinking is due to their propaganda. Very few people can bring themselves to accept that if civilisation continues on its present course then there will be disaster. You are obviously not one of them. That is clearly illustrated by the way you clutch at the straw of a minor error in the IPCC reports as justification of rejecting all their findings. Cheers, Alastair. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:36:10 -0600, David Buttery wrote:
Interesting... I wonder whether Google strips out anything in square brackets. (I don't use it so don't know.) It does, another reason not to use Google Groups. -- Cheers Dave. Nr Garrigill, Cumbria. 421m ASL. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday 26 Jan 2010 23:46, Alastair scribbled:
On Jan 26, 11:43 pm, David Buttery wrote: On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:41:58 -0800, Alastair wrote: I thought I had prefixed the subject with [GW] :-( Cheers, Alastair. You did. At least, both your posts show that prefix here. -- Bewdley, Worcs. ~90m asl. They did not show up on Google but the (GW) does. I will use that in future. Cheers, Alastair. Yet another reason for not using Google. -- Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. E-mail: newsman not newsboy "I wear the cheese. It does not wear me." |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Turbulence is as turbulence does. I wonder if there are anyflowerpeople out there that have not alarmed themselves out of dawlishing alltheir research and know enough about models to make a valid discussionwithout overdoing the adhominems | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
How many GW denial "scientists" are there? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
So "there", I was "gone". | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
If there is anybody there.... | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |