"Lawrence13" wrote in message
...
On Jan 29, 12:28 am, "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom
wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote : "Philip Eden"
philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :

Global Recession, Obama

Off topic, Lawrence.

I thought the general consensus was that as long as it was prefixed
people were happy?

Read the charter

Okay AGW Off Topic for UK sci.weather but on topic for UKMO. I see .

I would also add its impossible to discuss AGW without the politics .

You are quite wrong. The charter encourages discussion of
climate topics "from a scientific standpoint and not a political (or
environmental-activist) one." What's difficult about that?

Finally are you personally going to police my posts but ignore the
others?

No. But I don't necessarily see all of "the others".

Philip

That's it Philip we're through.
Could you please return my Christmas presents: the signed by
Christpher Booker ''The Real Global warming Disaster' and the leopard
skin covered hand crafted Kenyan mpingo wood barometer . Howver you
can keep the ' Tudor Huges Plays Bach's Brandenburg Concerto on the
trombone' CD as I have the DVD anyway.
====

LOL

Will
--

On Jan 29, 3:26*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Jan 29, 12:28*am, "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom
wrote:





"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote : "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :

Global Recession, Obama

Off topic, Lawrence.

I thought the general consensus was that as long as it was prefixed
people were happy?

Read the charter

Okay AGW Off Topic for UK sci.weather but on topic for UKMO. I see .

I would also add its impossible to discuss AGW without the politics .

You are quite wrong. The charter encourages discussion of
climate topics *"from a scientific standpoint and not a political (or
environmental-activist) one." What's difficult about that?

Finally are you personally going to police my posts but ignore the others?

No. But I don't necessarily see all of "the others".

Philip

That's it Philip we're through.

- Show quoted text -

I never knew you two were an item. That never made it into your
Telegraph reports AFAIK, Philip!

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:59:09 -0800 (PST), Dawlish
wrote:

On Jan 29, 3:26*pm, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Jan 29, 12:28*am, "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom
wrote:





"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote : "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :

Global Recession, Obama

Off topic, Lawrence.

I thought the general consensus was that as long as it was prefixed
people were happy?

Read the charter

Okay AGW Off Topic for UK sci.weather but on topic for UKMO. I see .

I would also add its impossible to discuss AGW without the politics .

You are quite wrong. The charter encourages discussion of
climate topics *"from a scientific standpoint and not a political (or
environmental-activist) one." What's difficult about that?

Finally are you personally going to police my posts but ignore the others?

No. But I don't necessarily see all of "the others".

Philip

That's it Philip we're through.

- Show quoted text -

I never knew you two were an item. That never made it into your
Telegraph reports AFAIK, Philip!

And I'm their love child lol

Mark
Sothend

"Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :
"Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :

Global Recession, Obama

Off topic, Lawrence.

I thought the general consensus was that as long as it was prefixed
people were happy?

Read the charter

Okay AGW Off Topic for UK sci.weather but on topic for UKMO. I see .

I would also add its impossible to discuss AGW without the politics .

You are quite wrong. The charter encourages discussion of
climate topics "from a scientific standpoint and not a political (or
environmental-activist) one." What's difficult about that?

But he has added 'OT' and 'AGW' so that those who wish
to do so may filter them out. This is accepted practice on
other groups and seems like a fair compromise.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

Dawlish wrote:


And what would those political views be Natsman? They are so "thinly
disguised" that you have no idea of my politics. You know I am a GW
sceptic

Really?
I thought you said you were 90% convinced by AGW?
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

"Col" wrote in message
...

"Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :
"Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :

Global Recession, Obama

Off topic, Lawrence.

I thought the general consensus was that as long as it was prefixed
people were happy?

Read the charter

Okay AGW Off Topic for UK sci.weather but on topic for UKMO. I see .

I would also add its impossible to discuss AGW without the politics .

You are quite wrong. The charter encourages discussion of
climate topics "from a scientific standpoint and not a political (or
environmental-activist) one." What's difficult about that?

But he has added 'OT' and 'AGW' so that those who wish
to do so may filter them out. This is accepted practice on
other groups and seems like a fair compromise.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl


That's what I thought Col, I could carry on as usual but I've now got the
big guns against me and if I don't toe the line I'll become the pariah of
the NG. It's not in my nature to be selective or measured with this topic
so I'll guess I'll have to go elsewhere.

I will say in my defence, that I've pulled a few legs , taken the mickey,
made umpteen spelling mistakes, talked rubbish, set out to make some points
and hopefully with a sense of fun and self deprecation. I've never
consciously set out to hurt any ones feelings and have only given a bit of
stick back after some had been thrown my way.

I do believe in climate change but not to the extent of the moaning minnies
who hate everything that humans have achieved and naively think there was
another choice.

Weather has been politicised and UKMO is the definitive proof of that as its
services have extended further into gobbledygook.

I can't cover up my irritation, anger and disbelief so to stay here would
just make it unpleasant. So after ten years its goodnight from me.

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

"Col" wrote in message
...

"Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :
"Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :

Global Recession, Obama

Off topic, Lawrence.

I thought the general consensus was that as long as it was prefixed
people were happy?

Read the charter

Okay AGW Off Topic for UK sci.weather but on topic for UKMO. I see .

I would also add its impossible to discuss AGW without the politics .

You are quite wrong. The charter encourages discussion of
climate topics "from a scientific standpoint and not a political (or
environmental-activist) one." What's difficult about that?

But he has added 'OT' and 'AGW' so that those who wish
to do so may filter them out. This is accepted practice on
other groups and seems like a fair compromise.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl


That's what I thought Col, I could carry on as usual but I've now got the
big guns against me and if I don't toe the line I'll become the pariah of
the NG. It's not in my nature to be selective or measured with this topic
so I'll guess I'll have to go elsewhere.

I will say in my defence, that I've pulled a few legs , taken the mickey,
made umpteen spelling mistakes, talked rubbish, set out to make some
points and hopefully with a sense of fun and self deprecation. I've never
consciously set out to hurt any ones feelings and have only given a bit
of stick back after some had been thrown my way.

I do believe in climate change but not to the extent of the moaning
minnies who hate everything that humans have achieved and naively think
there was another choice.

Weather has been politicised and UKMO is the definitive proof of that as
its services have extended further into gobbledygook.

I can't cover up my irritation, anger and disbelief so to stay here would
just make it unpleasant. So after ten years its goodnight from me.

Lawrence, please, Philip is not a "big gun" - nobody is. It's a free country
and I for one enjoy your posts, far more than the cross-posting idiots with
fake e-mail addresses, and would you believe even share some of your views -
you have a much needed sense of humour. All people have to do is use the
killfile.

DON'T GO.

Will
--

On Jan 29, 3:35*pm, "Will Hand" wrote:
"Lawrence13" wrote in message

...
On Jan 29, 12:28 am, "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom
wrote:



"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote : "Philip Eden"
philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message
...
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote :

Global Recession, Obama

Off topic, Lawrence.

I thought the general consensus was that as long as it was prefixed
people were happy?

Read the charter

Okay AGW Off Topic for UK sci.weather but on topic for UKMO. I see .

I would also add its impossible to discuss AGW without the politics .

You are quite wrong. The charter encourages discussion of
climate topics "from a scientific standpoint and not a political (or
environmental-activist) one." What's difficult about that?

Finally are you personally going to police my posts but ignore the
others?

No. But I don't necessarily see all of "the others".

Philip

That's it Philip we're through.
Could you please return my Christmas presents: *the signed by
Christpher Booker ''The Real Global warming Disaster' and the leopard
skin covered hand crafted Kenyan mpingo wood barometer . Howver you
can keep the ' Tudor Huges Plays Bach's Brandenburg Concerto on the
trombone' CD as I have the DVD anyway.
====

LOL

Will
--

LOL^2

Cheers, Alastair..

Lawrence, please, Philip is not a "big gun" - nobody is. It's a free
country and I for one enjoy your posts, far more than the cross-posting
idiots with fake e-mail addresses, and would you believe even share some
of your views - you have a much needed sense of humour. All people have to
do is use the killfile.

I agree Will!

Lawrence along with Will's posts (and a few others) I always read what you
have to say and agree with some of the points you make.
Most of all I enjoy your sense of humour, which is badly needed on here at
times!

Don't be driven away!


Graham

In article ,
Lawrence Jenkins writes:
snip
I can't cover up my irritation, anger and disbelief so to stay here would
just make it unpleasant. So after ten years its goodnight from me.


I shall be sorry to see you go. You've often irritated me, but have more
than made up for it with your marvellous sense of humour.
--
John Hall
"Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
from coughing."
Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)