Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's one for Will!
Why are the models have so much trouble with the present set up? We go from very cold to very mild, they are all over the place!! Graham |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Graham" wrote in message ... Here's one for Will! Why are the models have so much trouble with the present set up? We go from very cold to very mild, they are all over the place!! Graham I thought I'd already explained it, perhaps not very well! Two things - (1) The behaviour of the low and associated warm advection in western Atlantic (now at T+48) and largely resolved. If warm advection was further east then some mobility into UK otherwise as now we get a slow down and build of pressure. (2) The second was the behaviour of the vortex over and around Norway. This is starting to get resolved as well but not entirely. If it persisted and came south then it would prevent the high building across to north of Britain, if it weakened and/or drifted north then pressure would build across putting us into an easterly where the low-level air would be bitterly cold. Note that 850hPa temps. will not be a useful guide as cold air will be below this to start with. The deeper cold air (if it gets here) will bring widespread snow. Indications are now that the vortex will indeed become weaker eventually putting us into an easterly or even northeasterly after a cold-warm battle which has started now. The persistence of the vortex has been intensely interesting as I think it has been forced from the stratosphere (where models have fewer levels) and it has given Norway some awesome snowfalls as kindly shown to us by Bjorn! Don't be a sucker - be prepared! :-) Will -- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't be a sucker - be prepared! :-)
Will As a layman lurker, it's been several weeks since I dared to suck anything in case I end up down the gap! Paul Leigh Lancs |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Will Hand" wrote in message ... "Graham" wrote in message ... Here's one for Will! Why are the models have so much trouble with the present set up? We go from very cold to very mild, they are all over the place!! Graham I thought I'd already explained it, perhaps not very well! Two things - (1) The behaviour of the low and associated warm advection in western Atlantic (now at T+48) and largely resolved. If warm advection was further east then some mobility into UK otherwise as now we get a slow down and build of pressure. (2) The second was the behaviour of the vortex over and around Norway. This is starting to get resolved as well but not entirely. If it persisted and came south then it would prevent the high building across to north of Britain, if it weakened and/or drifted north then pressure would build across putting us into an easterly where the low-level air would be bitterly cold. Note that 850hPa temps. will not be a useful guide as cold air will be below this to start with. The deeper cold air (if it gets here) will bring widespread snow. Indications are now that the vortex will indeed become weaker eventually putting us into an easterly or even northeasterly after a cold-warm battle which has started now. The persistence of the vortex has been intensely interesting as I think it has been forced from the stratosphere (where models have fewer levels) and it has given Norway some awesome snowfalls as kindly shown to us by Bjorn! Don't be a sucker - be prepared! :-) Will I'm well prepared - I've been one for three weeks! Dave -- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 3, 9:58*pm, doc_paul wrote:
Don't be a sucker - be prepared! :-) Will As a layman lurker, it's been several weeks since I dared to suck anything in case I end up down the gap! Paul Leigh Lancs *)) It looks like the gap will only be about a month long Paul! With cross model agreement, next week looks cold. Nothing sorted at 10 days and after all the changes this week, the change to cold looks like it will arrive much closer than my own forecasting distance of 10 days. It does look cold at 10 days, but though I'd be confident enough of cold next week now, my confidence at 10 days is still not high. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Solid triangle on station models? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Stand by your models | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Why do models change so drastically? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
This is why some of us shouldnt rely to much on models | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
GFS Models | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |