RSS first out with an anomaly of +0.588C. 2nd warmest February in the
31-year squence to 1998. Still very warm globally.

bull****

Dawlish wrote:
RSS first out with an anomaly of +0.588C. 2nd warmest February in the
31-year squence to 1998. Still very warm globally.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 at 02:04:01, Dawlish wrote in
uk.sci.weather :

RSS first out with an anomaly of +0.588C. 2nd warmest February in the
31-year squence to 1998. Still very warm globally.

So the warmer the world gets, the colder UK winters get?

I can live with that...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me)

On Mar 4, 7:26*am, Paul Hyett wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 at 02:04:01, Dawlish wrote in
uk.sci.weather :

RSS first out with an anomaly of +0.588C. 2nd warmest February in the
31-year squence to 1998. Still very warm globally.

So the warmer the world gets, the colder UK winters get?

I can live with that...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me)

I rather hope not, but local seasonal synoptics can do all sorts which
don't follow global trends for a while!

On Mar 3, 10:04*am, Dawlish wrote:
RSS first out with an anomaly of +0.588C. 2nd warmest February in the
31-year squence to 1998. Still very warm globally.

UAH follows with an anomaly of +0.61C. Same as RSS in that it is the
2nd warmest, in their 31-year sequence, to Feb 1998. A very warm month
by the 2 satellite measures. The ground-based measures will be out
from around mid-month. Any comments and explanations from sceptics
would be good.

Why is it so warm?

On Mar 5, 8:04*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Mar 3, 10:04*am, Dawlish wrote:

RSS first out with an anomaly of +0.588C. 2nd warmest February in the
31-year squence to 1998. Still very warm globally.

UAH follows with an anomaly of +0.61C. Same as RSS in that it is the
2nd warmest, in their 31-year sequence, to Feb 1998. A very warm month
by the 2 satellite measures. The ground-based measures will be out
from around mid-month. Any comments and explanations from sceptics
would be good.

Why is it so warm?

You know, I wondered why the UAH figure was only the second warmest in
the sequence after such high temperatures had shown on the daily
updates throughout February. It's now clear. Roy Spencer has adjusted
his February figures downwards because of errors creeping into his
figures. It has reduced the February figure from +0.74C to +0.61C.
Spencer does say that this will result in a redistribution of values,
rather than a reduction and it is more in line with RSS as a result.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/

At the same time, another sceptic, appears to be under some pressure
to retract some of his claims:

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2010/03/...anthony-watts/

On Mar 5, 8:04*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Mar 3, 10:04*am, Dawlish wrote:

RSS first out with an anomaly of +0.588C. 2nd warmest February in the
31-year squence to 1998. Still very warm globally.

UAH follows with an anomaly of +0.61C. Same as RSS in that it is the
2nd warmest, in their 31-year sequence, to Feb 1998. A very warm month
by the 2 satellite measures. The ground-based measures will be out
from around mid-month. Any comments and explanations from sceptics
would be good.

Why is it so warm?

GISS out today and it reflects the warmth of the two satellite
measures at +0.71C. The second warmest February in the 130 year
sequence and also the 4th warmest of any month in the GISS temperature
series. NOAA global figures should be out early this week.

March, so far, is warmer than February was, according to Roy Spencer
at UAH:

http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/

On Mar 14, 7:43*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Mar 5, 8:04*pm, Dawlish wrote:

On Mar 3, 10:04*am, Dawlish wrote:

RSS first out with an anomaly of +0.588C. 2nd warmest February in the
31-year squence to 1998. Still very warm globally.

UAH follows with an anomaly of +0.61C. Same as RSS in that it is the
2nd warmest, in their 31-year sequence, to Feb 1998. A very warm month
by the 2 satellite measures. The ground-based measures will be out
from around mid-month. Any comments and explanations from sceptics
would be good.

Why is it so warm?

GISS out today and it reflects the warmth of the two satellite
measures at +0.71C. The second warmest February in the 130 year
sequence and also the 4th warmest of any month in the GISS temperature
series. NOAA global figures should be out early this week.

March, so far, is warmer than February was, according to Roy Spencer
at UAH:

http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/

NOAA has February as the 6th warmest in its series. According to NOAA,
the southern hemisphere was the warmest on record.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/?repor...d=Get+Rep ort

On Mar 15, 5:44*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Mar 14, 7:43*pm, Dawlish wrote:





On Mar 5, 8:04*pm, Dawlish wrote:

On Mar 3, 10:04*am, Dawlish wrote:

RSS first out with an anomaly of +0.588C. 2nd warmest February in the
31-year squence to 1998. Still very warm globally.

UAH follows with an anomaly of +0.61C. Same as RSS in that it is the
2nd warmest, in their 31-year sequence, to Feb 1998. A very warm month
by the 2 satellite measures. The ground-based measures will be out
from around mid-month. Any comments and explanations from sceptics
would be good.

Why is it so warm?

GISS out today and it reflects the warmth of the two satellite
measures at +0.71C. The second warmest February in the 130 year
sequence and also the 4th warmest of any month in the GISS temperature
series. NOAA global figures should be out early this week.

March, so far, is warmer than February was, according to Roy Spencer
at UAH:

http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/

NOAA has February as the 6th warmest in its series. According to NOAA,
the southern hemisphere was the warmest on record.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/?repor...h=2&submit...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The final February global surface temperature measure is out. Hadley
shows an anomaly of +0.46C. The 5th warmest February in their 160-year
series.