On 5 Mar, 12:14, Belba Grubb wrote:
6.8 and 6.6, stronger than yesterday's 6.0.

The most recent ONEMI bulletin reports Mercalli VI effects in
Concepcion, IV in Angol, and III in Talco, Linares, and Tamuco:http://www.onemi.cl/

There's so many in that area after the big one, it's easier just to
link to the worldwide list for recent activity:http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...quakes_all.php

Here's a page I wish I'd thought to check back then:http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/

That last one is a must for all my other fans.

Scroll wheel for magnification then left arrow to home in on us.
(Thought I'd better point that out to Dawlish.)

Weatherlawyer wrote:
On 5 Mar, 12:14, Belba Grubb wrote:
6.8 and 6.6, stronger than yesterday's 6.0.


Handy Twitter user you might like to follow.

http://twitter.com/WheresItShaking

On 8 Mar, 18:10, "Les Hemmings" wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote:
On 5 Mar, 12:14, Belba Grubb wrote:
6.8 and 6.6, stronger than yesterday's 6.0.

Handy Twitter user you might like to follow.

http://twitter.com/WheresItShaking

Ta.

I save the NEIC lists if I can remember but I just don't have any
patience or stickability. And my memory is terrible too. All of which
is a pity as the current stuff though not fully analysed, is the only
data set that sets out ALL the quakes.

Marrying archived stuff to weather records is a very poor second. When
I first cottoned on to the stuff I do, I had vain ideas it might be
applied to archaeology in some way. Fat chance.

Thanks for the link though.
Appreciated.