uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 21st 10, 10:49 PM posted to sci.environment,soc.religion.quaker,uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2010
Posts: 81
Default Suggestion - future climate research involving cosmic ray cloud coverconnection

On Mar 21, 7:11*pm, Seebs wrote:
On 2010-03-21, Last Post wrote:

ø Nobody asks you to read them, but I expect
* *you are afraid you might learn something
* *that you do not like.


No, I'm not. *I'd *LOVE* for the world not to be in reasonably serious
danger of massive starvation within my lifetime, but the fact is, the
science on this is about as "controversial" as heliocentrism, evolution,
and the realization that autism is not caused by the mercury which
isn't even IN the vaccines under discussion.

ø It really is amazing how so many claiming to be
* *scientists post nonsense that denies science.


I'm not claiming to be a scientist. *I'm just observing that the positions
of scientists on this issue are about as consistent as the positions of
scientists on the germ theory of disease.

Whether global climate change was a realistic worry was a serious question
twenty years ago, maybe even ten. *It's not now. *Now the question is how
well we can figure out the mechanics and what if anything we can do about
it.

All your ranting is irrelevant; unless you can show that you are a
genuinely qualified expert in the field, I take your garbled nonsense
on the climate precisely as seriously as I take Jenny McCarthy's
incoherent rants about the nature of autism.

Slow down, stop assuming that the goal of everything is to win at
all costs, and look at the data, the studies, and the theories. *I have
never, ever, seen someone remotely competent and literate do this
and still hold to the "skeptic" position on climate change, any more than
I have on evolution. *It's over. *It was a good debate, it's great that
people thought seriously about it... and they thought seriously about
it, did research, and answered the question. *At this point, the "skeptic"
position is just plain insane.

Please stop crossposting this garbage.
...


Cosmic ray
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray

Nir Shaviv
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nir_Shaviv

Jan Veizer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Veizer

Celestial driver of Phanerozoic climate
ftp://rock.geosociety.org/pub/GSAToday/gt0307.pdf

138 cites of Celestial driver
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?ci...03&as_yhi=2003

-----

David Christainsen
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Preliminary results for the CERN CLOUD cosmic ray experiment Meteorologist[_2_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 December 16th 10 05:35 PM
More on why the cosmic ray/cloud cover connection is more important than greenhouse gases Doug Weller[_2_] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 4 April 5th 10 09:11 PM
More on why the cosmic ray/cloud cover connection is more important than greenhouse gases Doug Weller[_2_] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 4 April 5th 10 09:11 PM
ANOTHER NAIL IN THE COSMIC RAY COFFIN! Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 23 February 20th 07 11:50 AM
Cosmic ray flux and climate Waghorn uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 4 August 20th 03 06:26 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017