On 24 Mar, 13:53, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Back to dual quakes again by the look of things.

Only a couple of small pairs so far but the weather is absolutely
flaccid in the North Atlantic and things are wet instead of dry and
fine.

It isn't North Dacota but it isn't what it should be too, neither.
Which means a storm is brewing somewhere. And it looks like it could
be a biggie.

Really super-dooper ones occur when a long dearth takes place in the
network of quakes at 5M and larger. I don't think they are that common
when duals occur.

And all the action on hehttps://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/wxmap_cgi....cgi?&area=ngp...

seems to be going on along coastal margins mainly north of 60 degrees
north and south of 50 degrees south.

Some small stuff might blow up on he

http://satellite.ehabich.info/hurricane-watch.htm

A very flaccid North Atlantic today (24th March 2010) and an High in
the Denmark Straight. So is the Low bracketing it on the North
American mainland and the one that was yesterday's triple, to the
right, going to end in Tornadoes.

Wait a minute. It's a High between two Lows so that's a derecho right?
A right Right line squall.

Decisions, decisions!

Let's have a look at the old score board:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/wwa/

Some bad stuff promised but no cuddly toys. We'll see. If that 979
drops about 5 millibars we'll have something interesting.

Or not, as the case may be.

On 24 Mar, 17:25, Weatherlawyer wrote:

A very flaccid North Atlantic today (24th March 2010) and an High in
the Denmark Straight. So is the Low bracketing it on the North
American mainland and the one that was yesterday's triple, to the
right, going to end in Tornadoes.

Wait a minute. It's a High between two Lows so that's a derecho right?
A right Right line squall.

Decisions, decisions!

Let's have a look at the old score board:

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/wwa/

Some bad stuff promised but no cuddly toys. We'll see. If that 979
drops about 5 millibars we'll have something interesting.

Or not, as the case may be.

It seems they've now boxed off central Texas. Hope its not a bum
steer.

Some good videos on he

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opin...cle366309.html

That frog in the last one aught to signed up by the Taliban, he'd make
a right muckers of airport security.

6.0 M. 2010/03/25. 05:30. 13.8 N. 120.1 E. Mindoro, Philippine.

It isn't much. Probably the first formed from the demise of a tropical
storm east of there the other day. There were 4 centres to the Low
affecting Britain on the Midnight chart. This morning there are only
2.

Makes me think the values given to earthquakes is very far from their
true magnitudes. I think that was a twin or dual. 2 x 3M.

Could even be 2 x 4.5 for all I know:
4.9 M. /03/25 13:00. 34.2 S. 71.8 W. LIBERTADOR O'HIGGINS, CHILE
5.2 M. /03/25 11:11. 35.9 S. 72.9 W. OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE

What's a 4.9 + 5.2 worth?

http://www.wetterzentrale.de/topkarten/fsfaxsem.html shows a low in
the west just off Cape Hatteras. The prognosis is that it will build
to 1002 mb by tomorrow. But it will be in between two Highs, one of
which is over Greenland.

Also it looks to be joining the Low already through the passage so it
should be deepening.

If it goes to 980 mb the likelihood is that the resulting ferrets
will accompany a tornado cell over North America.

If the cell is in a place that has a lot of water underground and the
rosk isn't that far from the surface, there is every likelihood that
the place selected will also get a nurthquake.

Interesting too is that the rush to get people moved from that
eruption in Iceland was not so much where the erution was but the fact
the weather was obscuring things.

No doubt the same is true for volcanoes everywhere. Something to do
with the weather. I know not what.

On 27 Mar, 12:31, Weatherlawyer wrote:

If it goes to 980 mb *the likelihood is that the resulting ferrets
will accompany a tornado cell over North America.

It will of course be required to drop to 975 MB on the actual day of
the storm(s)

If the cell is in a place that has a lot of water underground and the
rocks aren't that far from the surface, there is every likelihood that
the place selected will also get an earthquake.

The tremors in the areas give by this map:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/100325_rpts.html
were not large enough to get onto the NEIC list.
Maybe they didn't occur
but I think they must have. Lots of them in pairs or more.

The ones in New York and Oklahoma made it on.
Life is like a box of chocolates.
You never know what to hold onto as you flee it.

On 27 Mar, 12:45, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On 27 Mar, 12:31, Weatherlawyer wrote:



If it goes to 980 mb *the likelihood is that the resulting ferrets
will accompany a tornado cell over North America.

It will of course be required to drop to 975 MB on the actual day of
the storm(s)

If the cell is in a place that has a lot of water underground and the
rocks aren't that far from the surface, there is every likelihood that
the place selected will also get an earthquake.

The tremors in the areas give by this map:http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/100325_rpts.html

were not large enough to get onto the NEIC list.
Maybe they didn't occur
but I think they must have. Lots of them in pairs or more.

The ones in New York and Oklahoma made it on.
Life is like a box of chocolates.
You never know what to hold onto as you flee it.

On 27 Mar, 12:45, Weatherlawyer wrote:

The tremors in the areas give by this map:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/100325_rpts.html

were not large enough to get onto the NEIC list.
Maybe they didn't occur
but I think they must have. Lots of them in pairs or more.

The ones in New York and Oklahoma made it on.

Or not, as the case may be:
2.9 M. 2010/03/27 11:37. 37.7 82.0 WEST VIRGINIA

Got me. That one.
I might have known this was going to be complicated.

On 27 Mar, 19:42, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On 27 Mar, 12:45, Weatherlawyer wrote:



The tremors in the areas give by this map:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/100325_rpts.html

were not large enough to get onto the NEIC list.
Maybe they didn't occur
but I think they must have. Lots of them in pairs or more.

The ones in New York and Oklahoma made it on.

Or not, as the case may be:
2.9 M. *2010/03/27 11:37. * * * * 37.7 * *82.0 * WEST VIRGINIA

Got me. That one.
I might have known this was going to be complicated.

Well that's put that one to bed, though the doubles are still on the
table.

Next one is a tornadic one or not as the case is more likely to be.
http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/phase/phases2001.html

It's been interesting. Next time I must try harder not to bwe afraid
of pending megaquakes.

On 27 Mar, 19:42, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On 27 Mar, 12:45, Weatherlawyer wrote:



The tremors in the areas give by this map:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/100325_rpts.html

were not large enough to get onto the NEIC list.
Maybe they didn't occur
but I think they must have. Lots of them in pairs or more.

The ones in New York and Oklahoma made it on.

Or not, as the case may be:
2.9 M. *2010/03/27 11:37. * * * * 37.7 * *82.0 * WEST VIRGINIA

Got me. That one.
I might have known this was going to be complicated.

Where is West Virginia on he
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/100327_rpts.html
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/100328_rpts.html